That traitor as you call him has done more for this country than Obama and Bush put together and did it in just a little over two years. We should have more traitors like him. Hillary is a born crook that keeps getting off. Lets hope the new Attorney General changes that.
Totally... I don't really want another 'card', but some foolproof form of voter ID... and none of THIS bullshit going forward... https://www.thenation.com/article/w...w-suppressed-200000-votes-trump-won-by-23000/ If you are going to have legitimate voter ID, it HAS to be National. I'm still mystified why the entire country cannot follow the same general election procedures myself....
Yep, exactly like that. Aren't you glad the people found out about it? Now if Russia leaked that would you be against knowing it?
and Fusion GPS didn't hire Steele till after the Free Beacon stopped doing business with them so the Free beacon had not a dam thing to do with Steele and his dossier a lie you liberals love to keep repeating
Because you should be allowed to dig through anything you want in a persons private life. If something comes out it comes out but that doesn't give you the authority to go looking anywhere you like. Besides, Mueller looked at his taxes, found nothing, and the IRS has looked at them, found nothing. What are you going to find that these professionals did not?
It appears far more closer to it then what we saw from the president. Sounds also like a Logan Act violation
THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I JUST SAID! WHERE IS THE LIE? TELL ME, WHERE? POINT IT OUT NOW! Just stop making up ****! "In April 2016, attorneys for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC separately hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while The Free Beacon stopped its backing (paying for it) in May of 2016. In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. Clinton campaign officials were reportedly unaware that Fusion GPS had subcontracted Steele, and he was not told that the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research."
FoxHastings said: ↑ And should highlight the important question: WHAT DOES HE GIVE THEM FOR THE INFORMATION???? NO country gives anything away for free....will Americans suffer when it's PAYBACK TIME??? So you think it's OK??? Or do you think if Trump does it it's OK because Democrats did it, implying you don't think it's wrong at all which means you don't think the Democrats were wrong. Can't have it both ways And how TF do you know what "it" is and why do you think you determine if laws were broke or not. First he said he wouldn't Then he said he would Put your right foot out Put your left foot out and shake it all about...and that's the Trump Dance!! FBI. The Left had no problem paying 12 million for using Russian information against Trump. Now your up in arms?[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE] Isn't that the same dance Biden did last week and again this week with China? First there is no worry about China, then we need to worry like hell about China.
Same way you verify it when a local interest provides information. The last people I would look to for verification would be our intelligence services .. compulsive liars and purveyors of propaganda they are - unfortunately. Did we need verification for the fact that Bernie Sanders claimed "The Clinton Foundation is a Problem" ? That is like asking for verification that the sun came up yesterday. Do we need verification for what Hillary/DNC did to Sanders ? How about the fact that they didn't deny it. We know that Hillary got the debate questions prior to the event - as this has been widely reported.
I remember clearly that in January 2003, the Germans were doing everything humanly possible to make everyone in other countries understand that the whole story about Saddam building -- and preparing to use "weapons of mass destruction" -- was utterly unfounded nonsense! It was all a puffed-up bluff cooked up by Saddam to keep the Iranians at bay, and to forestall them from trying to invade Iraq! Saddam had been our "fair-haired boy" for battling the Iranians tooth and nail during the 80's, so, shortly after it ended, he felt perfectly justified in taking Kuwait back over, because Kuwait HAD BEEN part of Iraq years before! The rest of that story all of us know. Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, you've GOT to take all streams of information into account, whether or not you actually believe any of it! Nobody but a fool would say, "Nope... not me... no, I'm not even vaguely interested in knowing anything about what my political opponents are cooking up...." or "Nope... not me... you Germans can take all your information about Saddam not actually having 'a pot or a window' on down the road. I don't want to know!" News flash -- the President of the United States needs to be able to be exposed to ALL information... whether he takes any of it seriously or not.
Who needs Christopher Steele when he has the direct sources, Putin, Kim Jong Un and Mohammed bin Salman?
So you think direct sources from Russia in the Steele report are not direct sources? You do realize Trump is President and talks to other world leaders don't you or are you saying Obama was guilty too? With a couple off hand sentences Trump got every Dem to go before the cameras and say any foreign contact is suspicious and needs to be investigated. LOL.
OK Paul Manafort’s ties to Russians: https://www.businessinsider.com/paul-manafort-russia-ties-2017-10 Roger Stone’s relationship with Paul Manafort: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/10/how-did-these-guys-get-hired/544358/https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/03/paul-manafort-american-hustler/550925/ On the Trump “senior foreign policy advisor” who had been vetted by Russian intelligence as a possible spy:’’ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ration-releases-carter-page-wiretap-documents On the fact that Papadopolous did brag about being told that the Russians had hacked the DNC e-mails. https://www.nationalreview.com/news...-why-he-turned-papadapoulos-info-over-to-fbi/ On Broidy, Nader, Prince, Flynn et al. https://apnews.com/a3521859cf8d4c199cb9a8567abd2b71 BTW, most of this is in the Mueller Report. But, of course, Trumpsters aren’t going to read.
It's like they have a case of hypochondria. The Doctors could find no illness, but the patient is certain it is there. The mechanic could find no issues with your car, but it doesn't mean there isn't something wrong with it. Well, there ya go. The product passed inspection. But there are no written or implied guarantees. No he didn't put out an invitation. He answered a question that was asked of him by Democrat George Stephanopulos during an interview.
Because according to you all you have to do for it to be ok is go through Steele. Kind of the damn point.
Ok, Tell us about the meetings between Russian intelligence operatives in Clinton’s campaign headquarters. Tell us about the meetings between her national security advisor and the head of station for the Russians FSB in the US. Tell us about how the Russian hacked the RNC servers (they did, actually) and how they coordinated through cut outs to use the information against Donald Trump. Tell us about the hotel deal in Moscow that Hillary Clinton was working on as a candidate, and how she repeatedly lied about it. Take your time. We have all day!
He indicated that he would gladly accept such an invitation. Of course, we already knew that, because he already did.
FoxHastings said: ↑ And should highlight the important question: WHAT DOES HE GIVE THEM FOR THE INFORMATION???? NO country gives anything away for free....will Americans suffer when it's PAYBACK TIME??? So you think it's OK??? Or do you think if Trump does it it's OK because Democrats did it, implying you don't think it's wrong at all which means you don't think the Democrats were wrong. Can't have it both ways And how TF do you know what "it" is and why do you think you determine if laws were broke or not. First he said he wouldn't Then he said he would Put your right foot out Put your left foot out and shake it all about...and that's the Trump Dance!! Isn't that the same dance Biden did last week and again this week with China? First there is no worry about China, then we need to worry like hell about China.[/QUOTE] Isn't that off topic and a clear evasion of my post? Why, yes, it is....