Please go back and read what I wrote You are deliberately misconstruing my posts Though I suppose it does not really matter as it allows me to make my point multiple times. And it usually takes simplistic images to get a point across to some
When your defense is that you couldn't be guilty of raping someone because they are "not your type"...the question becomes...What type DO you rape?
If you are a NY Billionaire playboy that women throw themselves on to the point you can just "grab 'em by the p***ies?" ? I'm guessing by the type that redefine the term "rape" for money and fame.They should be ashamed of themselves for diminishing the term.
Relax and look at a few common sense things -- "She's not my type" -- we all know what Trump meant. It was a way to deny and a way to insult. It has nothing to do with raping anyone. I might have said the same thing if I was accused, in truth or a lie. OK, so we now know Trump -- like him or hate him -- and it shows in many posts. Now we look at the accuser, I don't recall her name, and don't care. I watch her on TV and have both pity and disgust for her. She seems a bit eccentric and I wish she would shut up about claiming she was raped 25 years ago. Come on woman, show some class, if you didn't report it back then you should just shut up forever. Maybe we need a law that says if you don't report a rape within 3 days you can be sued for slander for claiming the felony, or some such protection for the accused. Three days gives you time to talk to family and/or a counselor, and then follow their advice. Females have now been weaponized and use rape to attack those whom they politically disagree or have a grudge against.
That would be an idiotic statement if made by an innocent person who was wrongfully accused of rape. Rape has nothing to do with attraction. When a pathological rapist feels the urge to rape, they don't look for a "willing woman". It would appear difficult to rape a woman who wants to be raped.
This is a common cliche statement and I know that it is not your words per se. With that being said, I see that statement and say that it is unmitigated BS. Rape comes in a lot of different forms, from simple date rape with 2 drunk participants and a resulting inability to legally consent, all the way to a vicious kidnap and force into a van violent assault; and everything in between. Surely, in some of those instances, it has nothing to do with attraction or sex and is all about control. In others, surely it is entirely about attraction and sexuality.
You keep exaggerating. That it would imply that it never has anything to do with attraction. As discussed in #59, rape takes many forms including men raping men.
Well this is where you weigh past history One hand Dirty Don the man known to have bragged about ***** grabbing, someone with a long history of allegations of impropriety, someone known to have flown the Lolita express with Jeffrey Epstein, a known paedophile and lastly someone who is known to lie more often than a three year old in a lolly factory Yep! Know who I believe
Trump Tax Returns? It would be nice if he would follow through on his promise to release them. But it would be just as illuminating to know how many Non-Disclosure Agreements he has out there.
Google what E. Jean Carroll looked like 25 years ago - she was more attractive than Trump's first wife.
In the case of Donald Trump we're talking about a serial rapist. It's a very specific type. Not a "date rape" or "drunk participants" or anything like that... He has accusations of sexual assault even for raping his own ex-wife. So the guy is just a "sick puppy". Attraction is not a factor.
At least 22 women who have accused him of different levels of sexual assault (ranging from non-consensual kissing or groping to rape). Look, I can accept that you agree with him politically. But to try to excuse the fact that he is a sexual deviant by calling it an "exaggeration" is not normal.
Personally, I am absolutely exhausted and colossally bored with your and a few other posters on this board incessant "orange man bad" mantra replete with you seemingly starting 5 threads daily on the subject. I avoid them like the plague because sincerely, how many times can the same basic concept be argued day, after day, after day, after day.....? My avoidance has nothing to do with your topics being too hard to argue against which is what Im sure you will try to claim, it truly is purely about avoiding a neurotic redundancy. With that being said, I saw that you made the statement rape has nothing to do with attraction. I figured if I were to respond to you in an utterly narrow fashion about that topic specifically and nothing else, that perhaps I could coax you out of your unhealthy obsession and perhaps you could also acknowledge that surely SOMETIMES it is related to attraction. I was wrong, you ignored what I actually said on the subject, and responded simply with yet another ORANGE MAN BAD reply. I would like to say that I am shocked, but looking back in hindsight, I should have known better.
So you don't like the fact that we prove 5 times a day that this guy is an incompetent and dishonest nut-job. Dully noted, but he's the President. We can't do much about his incompetence and mental state, but we can at least press our leaders to hold him accountable for his illegal acts. Worst part is the guy can't stop breaking the law! Let's be clear. You do know that, right? I'm sure you do. You know an innocent man would not stonewall and obstruct investigation that would clear him, right? Or keep witnesses that would testify in your favor (if you're innocent) from testifying. This is clear to you, right?
What I said is that I am exhausted and colossally bored. Please stop falsely putting words into my mouth. I quoted you and replied to the notion that you put forth that rape has nothing to do with attraction. Nothing more, and nothing less. You responded with another ORANGE MAN BAD rant ( this time about obstruction), and surprise surprise, have said not one thing about the singular thing that I mentioned, which was the notion that rape has nothing to do with attraction. For good measure, you falsely put words into my mouth. What a shock.
Wow, that's grabbing at straws. Trump has a base full of "lawyers" defending every boneheaded thing he says and does,
She didn't call it that, complete misrepresentation, yet it will undoubtedly be repeated over and over as it already has been a number of times... just goes to show the power of the Fox News type media. It's just another ironic thing about Trump and his base that one of their main "complaints" is fake news, the enemy of the people... and yet the news they eat and regurgitate is a huuuuuge load of lies and misrepresentations. Day in and day out, one after the other. Trump is a liar, Fox news type media are liars, and Trump's base are liars. Just complete and total liars....constantly.
Another The Accusation Is As Valid As Guilt In A Court of Law! Besides, her legs look like she had polio! Moi Use to be a Leg Man.
Anyone here can accuse trump of rape. Just like they could bret kavannaugh...once again the dirty democrats are more interested in politicians sex lives than POLICIES no surprise here