Ask your difficult questions of an Atheist.

Ah yes ask an atheist! Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!


LOL


Its becoming clearer every day what atheism is all about.

 

I have always made it clear that I do not know what else may be out there. However I am quite confident that if there is something we would consider "God", the things we made up are not it.

 

made up?
any evidence for this?
you just admitted that God existed on the last page so whats up with that?

Thats an admission that God exists.

How can you say man created a God and God does not exist at the same time?

If man created God and you agreed with it then God exists!

 

Although I do understand the limitations placed on your mental prowess, it is difficult to explain your inability to grasp such simple explanations. I will attempt to do so again in a more direct and simplified version.

I do not accept YOUR God or anyone elses. I leave open the possibility of something else.

 

but you just said you accept the God you talked about below

you are telling us what YOUR version of God 'IS'.
That IS your belief not mine,
so to you God exists to explain things they did not understand and unify societal homogeny.

 

Prove it. I mean, that comment could as well have been attributed to science as far as I am concerned.

 

Why and how would I "Prove" my opinion?

 

You are saying you do not know why you have that opinion?

How enlightened!

 

I find it highly ironic that a thread named "Ask atheists your difficult questions" has been turned into one where the Atheists question the theists. On top of that, it is even more ironic that the atheists, who claim to be the children and followers of the Enlightened era, demand proof and elaboration from believers, but cannot even bother to give the theists a two sentence long elaboration on their own opinions.

Just use your Enlightment reason and Atheist rational to at least motivate why you believe what you believe or, at least, be consistent enough not to demand believers to give you 300 pages of elaboration when you cannot even provide one that is two words long.

So far, no atheists in this thread has even answered any of the questions they have been asked and I find that highly laughable.

 

Because you claim to be an atheist and atheists claim to have superior reason and logic abilities and therefore only believe facts that can be proven. So whats up with this 'why' business? Im sure you must have some facts for us? Or is this really just a 'belief' that you dont lack?

 

The OP is about asking DIFFICULT questions.

Asking INANE questions places no obligation on anyone to answer them.

Feel free to post as many silly questions as you want but since they are OFF TOPIC no one has any obligation to respond to them.

Duly noted that it is ONLY the theists who are constantly PRETENDING to have "won the internets" on this thread when their vacuous inanities are ignored for obvious reasons.

 

Bovine excrement.

Bovince excrement.

Bovine excrement.

Bovine excrement.

 

Thats how superior logic and reason manifests itself

Lets see if the neoatheists can handle this difficult question: "Do you lack belief"?

 

Yeah, like, totally! I mean, like, I was, like... Ooooooh, a butterfly!

 

Congratulations!

Your ongoing vacuous content and puerile trolling has earned you a ONE-WAY all expenses paid ticket to Cyberia.

Have a nice life!

 

Can you prove I was trolling?

 

You did not ask me to prove my opinion (which I have already proven by having it), you seemed to ask me to prove what it entails....again, why do I need to prove that?….

 

Can you prove you are not?

 

same reason you expect believers to prove God.

No one expects you to prove that you posted an opinion, they expect you to prove the content (subject matter) of your opinion.

 

Indeed I lack a belief in your God, that is pretty much the definition of Atheist. Now you can begin your silly word games again.

 

Your definition of atheist is "the lack of belief in Kokomojojo's God"?

 

I have come to the conclusion that you just enjoy trolling for reaction as the alternative explanation would be viewed as insulting. Please try to play elsewhere or at least not with me.

 

So your patented response to everyones questions that try to sort things out by going into greater depth than 'lack belief' is that they are trolls? Seriously?

If thats the best you can do you dont need a thread, in fact you dont want a thread like this unless you want to demolish the neoatheist brand of atheology being peddled now days because thats whats happening!

You already stated your belief what 'God is',

what possible conclusions can readers come to other than neoatheists atheology is a total disaster?

How can you start a thread inviting people to get answers to difficult questions when the neoatheists here cant even reasonably address the most simple questions?

Calling everyone trolls that ask questions is not addressing anything, its a cop out!

 

I would like to point out the reasoning behind this thread and the result. I began this to answer every question asked, directly to show the differences between this and the "Ask A Christian threads. Those threads contain virtually no actual answers but continuous dodging and subterfuge intended to confuse or avoid an actual answer. I expected some level of pushback from religious folks but have instead dealt with individuals purposefully ignoring the answers and disputing the answers incoherently...I have answered every single question posed unless I missed one and those few members who avoid answering in their own threads seem to be the same ones trolling this one.....very bad form.

 

FALSE, you did not even try to address so much as one question I asked.

Starting with how can neoatheists toot their horns that they are the ideal characterization of superior 'reason' and 'logic' because they demand 'PROOFS' of everything before they accept it as truth when the FACT is they accept no Gods exist 'WITHOUT' any proof what so ever, but upon 'FAITH' alone, just like the believers?

You simply ignored it by calling me names.

Again I am agnostic btw

Looks to me like this thread merely proves 'pot calling kettle black'!