Apparently it's becoming more and more acceptable to beat up people of varying opinion in this country. Interesting. I wonder what the left would do if this was a CNN journalist covering a Trump rally? Do you think they would be as stone cold quiet like they are regarding the attack against this journalist? Discuss.
Correct, the left will act as if they are against violence and then turn around and excuse it. The best excuse is when they claim antifa is fighting the fascists. Antifa IS 100% the fascists out to assault anyone else's free speech when it doesn't conform to their liking.
But the 'concrete' milkshake thing has been proven to be a hoax. The 'hospitalized with brain damage' thing has proven to be, at the very least, vastly exaggerated, since he was feeling well enough to go on FauxNoise the very next morning, and we only have his word as to the affiliation of his attackers. Given his penchant for writing fake news articles himself, that is a totally unproven accusation until charges are filed. We'll see what shakes out.
So you deny he was assaulted, even after seeing it with your own eyes? Or is your argument that since he wasn't beaten as bad as people are claiming, it's A-Okay?
Whether the concrete milkshake thing happened or not doesn't change the fact that Ngo was assaulted. I see the left is acting as if it was all based on the milkshake idea, which hasn't been proven or disproven.
Did my post say any of that? Nope. Try again. I said: There were no concrete milkshakes. That has been proven to be a right-wing troll (read: complete and utter lie) He was not injured as badly as was claimed. Yet another right-wing troll. (read: exaggeration bordering on lie) We only have his word as to the affiliation of the attackers. Given his penchant for right-wing trolling himself, that must be independently verified before it can be stated to be fact. At present, it is dubious at best, and highly suspect at worst. This could be exactly what he claims. Then again, he could be an Asian Jussie Smollett. Until police are confident enough to at least file charges there is no real evidence either way. Your eagerness to take his word as gospel only exposes your own confirmation bias.
The video shows Ngo being hit in the back of the head with either a rock or a large chunk of what appears to be concrete. It was a potentially deadly battery.
We only have his word as to the affiliation of the attackers. Given his penchant for right-wing trolling himself, that must be independently verified before it can be stated to be fact. At present, it is dubious at best, and highly suspect at worst. This could be exactly what he claims. Then again, he could be an Asian Jussie Smollett. Until police are confident enough to at least file charges there is no real evidence either way. Your eagerness to take his word as gospel only exposes your own confirmation bias.
The "rock" went 'splash.' Ngo admits it was one of the milkshakes. Your confirmation bias is showing.
Of course the ingredients for the 'milkshake' is soy milk, quick drying cement, and additives to cause burning.
I say again: We only have his word as to the affiliation of the attackers. Given his penchant for right-wing trolling himself, that must be independently verified before it can be stated to be fact. At present, it is dubious at best, and highly suspect at worst. This could be exactly what he claims. Then again, he could be an Asian Jussie Smollett. Until police are confident enough to at least file charges there is no real evidence either way. Your eagerness to take his word as gospel only exposes your own confirmation bias. I don't see any identifying logos or marks, so it could've been Proud Boys looking to make a martyr. He wasn't one of their own, so it would have been really convenient for them, wouldn't it?
ROFL... Instead of condemning, the left try and spin, spin, spin to somehow make the victim as the accused. BRILLIANT!
Nope. Simply pointing out that all you have is rumor combined with your blatant confirmation bias. Unclutch those pearls and retire to your fainting couch. Someone will bring along your smelling salts after you recover from the vapors.
WTH is rumored!! That he was attacked? Were those Smollett actors and never once was he actually in fear for his life? All this was a hoax?
But you have no proof of who did it. The concrete milkshakes were a rumor later proven to be a lie. The extent of his injuries was a rumor later proven to be an exaggeration. No one has been arrested or even named as a person of interest yet. We have a video where the assailants cannot be identified, so all you have is the assault itself and who you WANT to be responsible for it. That's it. Everything else is supposition and wishful thinking on your part. Stop reacting and start thinking...
Wow!!! You are about as intensely partisan as they get. You see a video and downplay it to the best of your propagandizing abilities, you even go as far as blaming the right for attacking one of their own just to make a political point. The only people I know to have done something similar was when Clinton's campaign got their folks to pretend to be Sanders supporters who went off and became violent in order to make Sanders look bad. When we post pictures and videos on this board the first thing the left does is say they're doctored with Photoshop or Premier. In the thread about that lunatic AOC you're believing every word she says with absolutely no proof except whatever it is her mind conjures up. But when you see a video of actual leftist violence, then you race to the scene with insane theories in order to hide your side's violent nature.