Ok I guess we have established by now that you hate trump voters Well guess what? We hate you back But your hate is based on delusional nonsense that is only getting worse everyday
Like we all hate traitors, liars, sexual abusers and bigots. You seem to overlook the obvious too, they are crooks.
Criminals and their supporters somehow think the law does not apply to them. That’s corrupt Trump and his supporters. Everything else is a hoax except for their own bigotry and love of facscism. Voter suppression, minority rule, blaming groups of people for your own ills, lack of awareness of facts, like AGW and deficits. This is what it looks like.
It is the sore losers and disappointed Deep State king makers who ignore the rule of law Trump is a saint compared to your side And he’s no saint Which makes you guys pretty bad
The deep state is just the career govt workers who round up corrupt Republican politicians, indict and convict them. You know, guys like Mueller.
Add to this all the Trump indictments and crimes by Trump himself that are in the report and your statement becomes a complete farce. Now tell us again how AGW is a Chinese hoax and 1/3 of illegals vote from 60k busses for Dems and no one notices. What a joke !
law enforcement not under the auspices of the UCMJ. ie the FBI, DEA, USMS, state and local sheriffs, cops, police officers, state game wardens, etc.
Ridiculous only because you’ve accepted a minority govt, voter suppression and help from dictators to win elections. What is ridiculous, is thinking Trump has the answers and is smarter then a 12 year old.
Civilian law enforcement, thats a joke. They can help in dispatch, janitorial services, supplementary skills when requested by an officer but... “Private individuals can only make arrests when they've personally witnessed the criminal behavior and the breach has just occurred or there's a strong likelihood that the breach will continue.” Then, they can be suited more easily. It’s a joke. Don’t do it.
He is saying that "FBI, DEA, USMS, state and local sheriffs, cops, police officers, state game wardens" ARE civilian law enforcement. As in they aren't the military. It certainly fooled me too. Like you, I was thinking that he meant random members of the public who don't do law enforcement for a living. But yeah, obviously "civilian" just means non-military.
Same right you have sticking your nose in ours. But no need worry. Iran will get nukes, Iran will continue to kill Americans, Iran will continue to imprison, torture, rape, and execute infidels for not wearing scarves, holding hands in public, sending Valentine Day’s cards, displaying any type of Western influence, and wearing a crucifix. So the moral giant you love and defend, Iran—the human mind’s epitome of light, truth, tolerance, justice, and knowledge—will be around for a long time, even to teach your great grandchildren’s children the love and kindness of Allah, and the wisdom of the Koran. As America fades into memory, tyranny becomes stronger and spreads. That ought to make the corrupt happy. Yes?
Jayzuz.....that's quite a quantum leap galaxies away from anything I have posted. Are you still looking under your bed for Communists?
That’s how I took it. After all, other then military police who have a very limited enforcement role, soldiers in the armed forces are not considered to be law enforcement at all. Even if “Marshall Law” is declared, their roles are limited to defined missions. The US coast guard also had a limited role in drug enforcement. I really have no idea what “civilian police “ refers to other then civilian volunteer groups and non sworn in individuals who may work along side sworn in police in limited roles. They are not under any circumstances considered police and are “vigilante groups” imo, if they don’t work in cooperation with sworn in officers.
FBI, DEA......and state, county and local police. The point is, soldiers under UCMJ are not normally law enforcement agencies at all. Either you’re in law enforcement or not. The “civilian” qualifier makes no sense.
LOL. I don’t have to look underneath my bed to find commies, there are plenty of Marx and Chomsky wannabes here. Quantum leap in logic? Perhaps, but then again I’m not the one attacking the West. So tell me: Do dictatorships have a right to exist?
According to whose set of Rules? You have to put that in context. I could equally ask (pointlessly) whether a democracy has a right to exist.
Democracies, nope. That’s why American isn’t. Context: The universe. The Rule: Liberty. The question: Do dictatorships have the right to exist? Ayn Rand: “Dictatorship nations are outlaws. Any free nation had the right to invade Nazi Germany and, today, has the right to invade Soviet Russia, Cuba or any other slave pen. Whether a free nation chooses to do so or not is a matter of its own self-interest, not of respect for the nonexistent “rights” of gang rulers. It is not a free nation’s duty to liberate other nations at the price of self-sacrifice, but a free nation has the right to do it, when and if it so chooses.” —http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/national_rights.html Obviously the answer is no, yet you choose to attack the West and not Iran. Hmm. Maybe a bit of rethink would help.