How can homosexuality not be a perversion?

No, it's not.

Even if you have sex with a shoe, it's of course "having sex". And I'm sure some people do so, and enjoy it.

But that's not what a shoe is designed for. Not exactly.

 

Sorry to break it to you but sexual intercourse involves penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth.

 

How are you using the term "aversion" here? Most people use it as repulsed by. Are you maybe using it as in "isn't attracted to"? Because there are many people out there who are of one orientation, but are not repulsed by the idea of sex with the opposite of their attraction, particularly if the pay or reward is worth it to them.

 

Perhaps humans never have sex for the sole purpose of procreation. But many often hope that will be the result.
The only time you've had sex was for procreation puposes?

 

Actually, I had plenty of sex. Got a girl pregnant and I married her, Had Two more sons thereafter. My wife had her tubes tied after the third because there were some complications. There....I gave you a little of my history. I have supported all of my sons and daughters. My oldest I have helped in his business. I stay connected and help my entire family. That is responsibility. There is such a thing as protected sex. You;ll laugh, but sex can be confined to the marriage relationship. I see that as the model even though I did not know it when young. Today children are raised as "free range children". No responsibility. Do whatever feels good. Am I saying here what you would advocate?

 

So gay people are being more responsible than the average straight person. They never produce unwanted children. If they do have kids, it either by adoption or intentional design.

 

Yep you'll never see an abortion come from a gay couple. That's one thing they have going for them other than a sad sad life.

 

I’ve worked with a number of them who have very pleasant lives. Sad is someone who wastes their days posting moronic hatred of gay people on the internet.

 

I'm sure you have and Yes I agree.

 

Exactly. Those who criticize homosexuality the most are the ones who are likelier to practice it, especially in secret.

 

Interestingly, open expression of homosexuality has become more prominent in society as more gays have turned out to be conservative and right wing television evangelism has become more influential.

 

No, I was just trying to teach you something about the English language.

 

Once again? Probably because I did not see where you asked me to address it. I don't scrutinize your every post, i mostly ignore them.

But if that is your question, yes, I "confess" that the mouth evolved for or was designed for ingesting nourishment, not reproduction. Read a high school biology book if you don't believe me.

Don't mistake any of that for a moral objection to what people do in their bedrooms. Or to their shoes, etc.

I just hope you guys don't get sick.

 

Yes, but your earlier post referred to "having sex". I never denied that anal intercourse was sexual intercourse, just as you can't deny that rubbing a sex organ against a shoe is "having sex." Well, you can if you want, I guess.

You should read some of the health advisories about anal sex sometime, since you believe it as so natural and all. I did so for purpose of this thread. There sure are a lot of precautions one must take. Even monogamous straight couples have to be extra careful, and it's more than just wearing a condom, which heterosexuals also should do (unless they're monogamous, in which case the concern for fear of std's and bacterial infection is greatly reduced.)

This isn't controversial stuff, except among those who just like to argue or who feel they are being persecuted because their practices are questioned on a health basis. Again, read And the Band Played On, and you'll see the same libertarian arguments you guys are making here being made by gay people against the "sexual fascists " trying to save them from death by AIDS. Unfortunately, thousands paid no attention and died.

 

Is that a fact?

 

I think it reasonable to hypothesize that the impulse to have sex traces to an instinctive drive to reproduce, even when one knows he is sterile or barren. There is much about the brain we don't know. People sometimes have sex just to get it out of their system. They are neither reproducing nor having fun.

 

Anal prolapses are one fun filled, possibility. Sounds great!
Must be loads of fun to wipe after it's intended purpose!

 

Oh, and p.s., to yardmeat, the mouth is also part of the respiratory system.

It is not part of the reproductive system.

 

Really.

 

Not to mention anal fissures, such a thing can lead to an infection, requiring a colostomy bag to heal. pooping over an open wound. I think my anus shall remain, exit only!
Pretty gross but it comes with the territory.

 

But who designed sex organs? No one, it was just nature. And nature is just mutations and natural selection which changes features all the time. So there isn't any inherent authority about the purpose of certain organs. So my advise is do whatever sex is healthy for you, and gets the consent of your partner, and not worry too much about what is designed for what. Remember, fingers were not designed to type in digital devises, but that doesn't make it wrong.

 

Or, since what other consenting adults do in their private lives doesn't affect you, you can shut the **** up and mind your own ******n business.

The level of fascism on the right when it comes to sex and marriage is astounding.

 

What do you mean "men tried to procreate as well?"

Sure, my point is that procreation is what sex primarily EXISTS for.

 

Yes, that's why I said "in the right biological conditions."

 

Nice spin