Lindsey 'We have to bomb Syria or ISIS will nuke Charleston Harbor' Graham is a warmonger overgeneralizing Islam, and the crusades were a response to centuries of Islamic invasion of Europe.
This must be why they don't commit acts of terror in other western countries and even islamic countries that never put military there. Are you going to tell us next that they do it because they are poor and need jobs?
"Lindsey Graham: Muslims Want To "Kill Us All"" yes, fanatical Muslims want to kill us, just like fanatical Christians want to kill Muslims, Jews and black people and gays religious fanatics are a problem for sure
those that want to violently attack or kill people that don't believe like they do, those that want to provoke a religious war between Christians and Muslims
I see, so where do "fanatical" muslims rate in the US/Western/World population as sorted by nation/region/and religion? What are the other tiers of muslims, and based on what criteria? Peer reviewed studies would be best. But whatever you can find I will review.
I disagree. If you check out statistics and cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Oakland etc....funnily enough all democratic plantations for decades, the Black gangs are by a mile the biggest danger to Americans and their lives. They do exactly what ISIS does, kill people and terrorise communities.
Who are these fanatical Christians who "want to kill Muslims, Jews, and black people and gays"? Can you name the individuals or groups who are plotting this scheme? Where did you learn of them?
That is not an actual quote from Lindsey Graham. Although he did use the words "kill us all" he did not say "Muslims want to kill all Americans". The inclusion of the word "Muslims" is an intentional misquote to make it seem as if he is referring to Muslims instead of extremists.
And that's another reason why there is so much mistrust regarding those who are so often claiming "Islamophobia". The 'Muslims as victims' charges have worn out long ago.
The Crusades were a loot and pillage operation. Christianity was centered in Rome. Christians didn't care about Palestine at all. The Church's power was waning.. The crusades gave it a shot in the arm.. The righteous Crusaders killed everyone along the way to Palestine.. Jews, Christians, peasant farmers. How do you think they were provisioned? ISIS has nukes now? Where did Lindsey get his intel from?
ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab.. Those kinds of groups. Usually they have some underpinning of the beliefs of Hasan Banna or Sayiid Qutb.
The US has an ongoing repressive policy on the middle east. They destroyed Iraq over nothing. They supported the WDM war of Saddam Hussein. They overthrew the democratic government of Iran. They support the genocide in Yemen. They support the ethnic cleansing by the Jews. They support the thug government of Egypt. They destroyed Afghanistan over 911 over the course of 10 years, while they destroyed Al Qaida in a couple of weeks. Them 10 years was just for ousting the Taliban who had nothing to do with it. It's geopolitics. And it won't take much for the US to go and destroy Iran. Face it. Christians and Jews killed more Muslims to strengthen their geopolitical position than Muslims killed Christians and Jews in reprisal. And it all started by cutting up the Ottoman empire to apply thug colonial rule.
Huh! So even if true what does that have to do with the way he conducts himself politically? I am not a fan of all those extra "rights" that gays, trans, schmanz, and fluid blue-id, lesbians are getting but really now does his alleged gayacity explain his political duplicity??
Gibberish! The Crusades were an answer to the relentless Muslimic attacks over Europe and Christians. Spain, the Balkans, Greece (the cradle of the Greek-Roman world), Sicily, Malta, etc. - all raided by the Islamic thugs under the pretense of Islam. So the Pope said "enough is enough" and the Crusades happened. So you see, the Crusades were "Made in Muslimhood".
If you went to fight in the Crusades all your sins were washed away and you were assured of heaven. Merchants wanted booty. The Pope wanted to reunite the church. Popular understanding of the crusades nowadays tends to think in terms of a great conflict between faiths fueled by religious fanaticism. This perception is bound up with modern sensibilities about religious discrimination, and it also has resonances in reactions to current political conflicts in the Near East and elsewhere. But it is a perspective which, at least as far as the First Crusade is concerned, needs to be rejected. (Riley-Smith, 1 https://www.ancient.eu/article/1249/the-crusades-causes--goals/
There weren't Muslims thugs, only Christian ones. When the crusaders were just a bunch of rapist, looters, genocidal monsters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(1099) Do read. Under the Muslim rule, Jerusalem was a nice mixed religious thing, with Jews fighting with Muslims against the European thugs while there were Eastern Christians living in Jerusalem. And them European Christians just went on a genocidal killing spree.
“The one thing I like about President Trump is that he understands we are fighting a religious war,” the South Carolina lawmaker said Tuesday evening on Fox News. “We are fighting people who are compelled by their religious views to kill us all. They kill fellow Muslims who don’t agree with their view of Islam. They kill Christians and vegetarians, libertarians, you name it. We are in a war.”... You dont agree with Graham?? And why the dishonest post title that insinuates he's talking about all Muslims? Is it important to be dishonest when making a point?
From 650 A.D. to 1683 Islam made a huge effort to do a military pincher movement against Europe, with one pincher going over the Pyrenees and one pincher going up the Balkans. They were far superior militarily to various popes' rag tag unorganized armies that resisted, and imo it is only by good luck for the West that Islam failed militarily. Long renowned be Charles the Hammer Martel and the Battle of Tours.
Yeah. But so what. Just because they are Muslim and conquering, doesn't mean they are bad. If you go like that,.. the west were monsters for making the world their colony. The thing is... how did people live under Muslim rule. And the people lived rather ok under Muslim rule. You can't say that when the Christians came by. Even now... with this Lindsey Graham,.. the verbal hostility against Muslims is just utterly insane and on par of them terrorists who kill Muslims.
Islam intends to rule the entire world. Dar-al-Islam intends to take all of dar-al-Harb. The USA gave up colonialism and conquest long ago. Hell, the USA gave up the idea of winning wars after 1948.