Well did the Commission claim to question Bush and Cheney as to why they were obstructing/preventing any investigation?
I'm not sure that's accurate. He has only said to me that he simply doesn't know because he posits that there was no proper investigation on the planes, citing no part numbers etc. So even if someone doesn't say that there was no planes but just says that they cannot say for sure, does this make them a "no planer" in your mind?
No, you've got that wrong. He really doesn't believe that it's all true. However, while you've got his position wrong, I think that he has gotten yours wrong, believing you to be a "no planer" but I don't think that's correct. @Adam Fitzgerald is just as much a part of the 9/11 Truth Movement as you are, just coming at it from a different angle. It's a shame that you can't both find common ground.
No one knows but I highly doubt it. Remember the 9/11 Commission's own claim: 22. The 9/11 Commission claimed in their report that "their aim has not been to assign individual blame", thus making a mockery of the "investigation". Like I said, he believes the OCT is true despite the massive, admitted flaws, he made that claim several times. I believe the OCT is a fairy tale made for children. There is always an element of truth to a lie, in order to mask the lie. So there were planes that crashed into the twin towers, we saw these on video. We did not see what allegedly crashed into the Pentagon or into a hole in the ground at Shanksville, so those 2 stories are highly suspect. Even if they truly were planes, we don't have any physical evidence that supports the official claims, and that makes no sense. We don't know for sure what or who flew any planes because all we have is the official story, which makes no sense and is unsupported by evidence (or lack of) or the "evidence" claimed to be in support is extremely suspect, contradictory or virtually impossible. If there's nothing to hide, why is the US government hiding everything?
He is a no planer. He he admitted it to me in previous conversations before i blocked him. I dont talk to no planers, period.
That’s your phony definition of a “no planer”. In other words if you don’t bend over and go along with the exact official story you’re a “no planer”. Translation: I reject the official narrative because it’s unsupported by any incontrovertible evidence and you want to remain ignorant of that FACT so you refuse to read any post that contradicts or even questions the OCT. And to be real, you are reading all my posts and pretending to ignore them.
From what he told me some time ago he doesnt believe Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon or that Flight 93 crashed at Shanksville. This is the last time i will address anything about him, so dont bother asking me anything about him or what he thinks please.
I checked you out on Youtube. You have thousands of videos of 9/11 Commission testimonies. Any idea why there is no record of Bush and Cheney testifying?
Yeah, that's what I meant - do you have ny idea why there is no record of Bush and Cheney testifying?
This was most likely Cheney's decision. Bush was asked this by a reporter, as to why they both were to be interviewed together instead of separate interviews and Bush blew it off. Of course this was most likely so Cheney, and not Bush could control and dictate the interview.
Sorry, by "no planer" I thought you meant that someone doesn't believe that there were planes in ANY of the impacts.
Yeah, but I'm not asking why they were interviewed together, I'm asking why there is no record of their interview.
From what I read from his posts, he believes the vast majority of the OCT fairy tale is true. It seems he believes there are some answered questions but the potential answers don't change the heart of the story, they just expand it. I don't really care what he believes or doesn't, 9/11 is not about him or me either for that matter, it's about what really happened and what really happened is a far cry from the official story and no one really knows the facts other than the planners/perpetrators and other complicit agents. There are millions of people just like him who bought the OCT lock, stock and barrel. And as you can read, some maniacally defend it in this and other forums almost 24/7 and never, ever question any significant portion of the OCT.
The term implies they swallowed the scam (the heart of the story). What they might question if anything is irrelevant in comparison to what they should question. They were and the answers were just accepted. For example Bush just said they answered every question.
Ask Cheney/Bush. My opinion would be that so their testimony wouldnt come back to implicate them in any fashion. But who knows really. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/us/bush-cheney-9-11-interview-won-t-be-formally-recorded.html