I've read the phone transcript and nowhere in the phone transcript does Trump "demand" or attempt to "bribe" anything from anybody. And Zelensky keeps publicly stating that he never felt pressured during the call and he didn't know about the aid being frozen until after the call. Why do you left-wingers keep ignoring that direct evidence from the person on the fricking call???????????
Another interesting answer. Avoid facts and answer with "look over here". Not fact No, it's a fact that Trump lies all the time I'm not getting this. Would you rephrase it He's insane. That's an opinion. Given the fact that it's very hard to understand the thinking of the insane and that said person lies all the time, it's possible that Trump believes his lies are the truth and if, as you say, Trump believes the opposite of what he says.......isn't that insane? Why would one do that?
Strawman. The transcript clearly shows trump asking for a “favor”. Because what he felt is irrelevant. The facts are indisputable. Trump abused his power by soliciting a foreign government to help him against a domestic political rival. The transcript confirms this, and so does the sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. Saying “Nuh uh” isn’t an argument.
One that is continuing to gain traction in the circles that determine stuff like that https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-psychiatrist-petition-congress-a9232386.html
Yes, I knew that he left it out. And that makes his testimony less credible. Forgot about? LMFAO! No, he revised it because Taylor and Morrison were total disasters and didn't have anything damaging about the President so Sondland took it upon himself to lie and make stuff up to cover for the Democrats Schiff show.
Here's a copy of the transcript. Please tell us in that document where the solicitation to help Trump against a political rival occurred. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
Hmm interesting... Can you take it one step further and copy/paste from his revised testimony (attached) exactly what you claim is a lie? Genuinely curious https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/05/rea...testimony-about-trump-pressuring-ukraine.html
Sure..... nothing easier... I would hope most on here would be capable of a PDF document search, but it's a brave new world “There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me,”
Pay attention to the facts... https://www.independentsentinel.com...ondland-lied-the-conversation-never-happened/
Such a HUGE fail.. I asked if you could point out a lie in his revised deposition and you point to Pence's COS saying something Sondland said in his hearing testimony is false.... I don't know why I bother... Never mind...
way to move the goalposts and avoid having to admit your views on why the individuals were there yesterday were wrong lol. second - so? They are constitutional scholars who's credentials are pretty significant from wiki reading. Or is anyone who doesn't fall down in worship of Trump automatically part of the conspiracy?
Did you see this ignorant cowpoke statement yesterday?? https://www.tweet247.net/united states/harvard or stanford Louie? I promise you your children, grandchildren, et al have ZERO chance of going to Harvard or Stanford Law Schools..
Trump said "do us a favor", NOT "do me a favor". "Us" being the Unites States of America. And that is NOT an impeachment offense by any standard. Just like the personal opinions and presumptions of the witnesses "is irrelevant" The Democrats have presented no facts. Just hearsay, personal opinions and presumptions. Get back to us when you do have some facts.
Boy! Your even less informed about this than I thought. Gordon Sondland Revises Impeachment Testimony to Acknowledge Ukraine Quid Pro Quo https://time.com/5719007/gordon-sondland-revises-testimony-ukraine-quid-pro-quo/ Really, if your going to participate you owe it to yourself to be at least a little informed.
Trump said no such thing. He said "do us a favor". Stop making crap up to satisfy your perturbed left-wing fantasies.
I did point out the lie. The lie was the whole conversation that Sondland said he had with Pence. According to Pence, the conversation never happened. Now if Sondland made up the conversation that never happened, then what else did Sondland make up in is testimony. Inquiring minds want to know.
The whole process was wrong because it was nothing but a partisan witch hunt run by angry Democrats who still have not gotten over the 2016 election.
I'm completely informed. But you aren't. Sondland lied and said he had a conservation with Pence. Pence says that conversation never happened. If Sondland lied about a conservation he had, then what else in his testimony is a fricking lie??????