Adam Schiff: Congress Must Impeach Trump to Stop Him in 2020

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by White MAGA Man, Dec 10, 2019.

  1. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,566
    Likes Received:
    91,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ok, let me get this straight; your premise, as well as other Trump haters, is that Trump, who was secretly colluding with Russia got on TV and asked to to hack Clinton, right? If he was secretly colluding with Russian, then why would he need to go on TV to ask them? Also, do you really believe Russia was sitting around waiting for Trump's permission to hack a former secretary of state and current presidential nominee? Really?
     
  2. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,566
    Likes Received:
    91,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I didn't think anyone who witnessed the 2016 democrat primary would ever complain about cheating.
     
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  3. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is plenty of testimony that is NOT hearsay.
     
  4. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ???

    There are people in jail right now for helping to facilitate Trump's Russia connection.

    BOTH his campaign managers for the 2016 election were found guilty of being unregistered foreign agents who were in contact with Russia. Plus, his personal lawyer is in jail for doing stuff that Trump directly told him to do.
     
  5. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All Ahead Full!
     
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  6. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And no evidence proved it
     
    Labouroflove likes this.
  7. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't look at me; I didn't pay any attention to it nor did I pay any attention to the republican primary in 2016.
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, I watched all the testimony. Assumptions and hearsay and no direct evidence.
     
    icehole3 and Labouroflove like this.
  9. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is stated in the articles of impeachment absolutely did happen.

    There is NO question about that.

    There are several different kinds of evidence and they all point to those artlcles being absoltely true.
     
  10. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, there is direct evidence.
     
  11. White MAGA Man

    White MAGA Man Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2019
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Absolutely false! Trump committed zero crimes. The articles are completely fabricated, just like Obama's fraudulent computer generated birth certificate.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, direct evidence of hearsay and assumptions.
     
  13. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He used it to save his son's job. Sounds like extortion to me.
     
  14. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,206
    Likes Received:
    20,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is only the presumption of the Democratic House that Trump abused his powers. To prove that presumption, they would have to prove that Trump had no valid reason to investigate the situation with Burisma and Biden's comments. That's a pretty high bar to pass without calling Biden to testify.
     
    Labouroflove likes this.
  15. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Testimony based on assumptions is still hearsay.
     
  16. Crownline

    Crownline Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes Received:
    6,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You bought into this narrative just as you did with Jussie.
    You should defend against being so willfully gullible.
     
  17. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All process crimes used to snag Trump which didn't work, per Judge Ellis.

    The strategy used the special counsel, as described by Judge T.S. Ellis III, is to find crimes committed by Trump associates and to indict them in order to pressure them to cooperate. This is what Ellis said about the indictment of Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort: “You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud. What you really care about is what information Mr. Manafort could give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump or lead to his prosecution or impeachment.”
    https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...indictment-follows-concerning-mueller-pattern
     
  18. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The issue is that there was plenty of testimony that WAS NOT hearsay.

    Finding hearsay exists does not mean that all evidence is hearsay - regardless of how much the GOP pitches that blatant lie as a way of allowing Trump to continue his assault on our democracy.
     
  19. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Didn't work?

    Manafort is in PRISON.

    Flynn is trying to offer enough evidence to reduce his prison time.

    His "personal lawyer" is in prison.

    "Didn't work"??
     
  20. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then why isn't Russian Collusion and the Ukraine phone call included in the articles of impeachment?
     
  21. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's that saying?

    A picture is worth a thousand words?

    [​IMG]
     
    Labouroflove and mngam like this.
  22. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For crimes that happened between 2006 and 2014 way before he was part of the Trump campaign.
    Do you mean the one that changed his political party affiliation to "Democrat?"
     
  23. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,407
    Likes Received:
    16,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Ukraine phone call IS in the articles of impeachment.

    The actual recording isn't there, because of obstruction of justice - which is one small part of the other article of impeachment.

    Its quite true that the articles of impeachment don't include the Russian collusion.

    There are several people who have been indicted and given sentences for that, but the House chose to focus on specifics that are absolutely clear cut and clearly show Trump's personal involvement on an issue that has continuing concern, as it is election crime and we have an upcoming election.
     
  24. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,840
    Likes Received:
    32,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roflol:

    Oh Wow.

    CA and NY have a Lot of Dems?

    This is a Revelation rivaling "The Ocean Contains Water".

    How do you keep coming up with these Hot Takes?:roflol:

    Oh, and back to the OP topic:

    Schiff is 100% Spot-On.

    But, obviously, the GOP Senate won't convict.
     
  25. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...not regarding QPQ, bribery or extortion which is what the Democrats and you left-wingers have been pushing for past two fricking months.
     

Share This Page