Bernie 2020 Field Organizer States “F***ing Cities Will Burn” if Trump Wins Re-Election

https://www.sanders.senate.gov/

He is an Independent that caucuses with the Democrats.

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/04/7001...files-to-run-as-a-democrat-and-an-independent

He's filed in all 50 states to run for President as a Democrat AND an Independent.

 

Shhhh… One day they might figure out how stupid that really is and want to burn down someone else's neighborhood. Then good law-abiding citizens would have to put them down, then they'd cry that they need to take our guns...

 

Hmm no. The electorate isn't majority Christian right. That's a minority group.

 

Ah, you don’t believe the majority of Christians are right of center...I do.

Or, you believe the polls about the non-religious being the largest voting block. The problem here is two-fold, being non-religious doesn’t equate to being a non-believer, and more importantly, they vote at a lower participation level.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/releva...ious-are-now-biggest-voting-bloc-america/amp/

 

79% of African Americans are Christian. They are not a reliable Trump voting block.

 

And the percentage of Christians that are White and Right and not Black and Left?

 

Not a majority

 

And who put Trump over the last time?

 

I’ve seen the polls. Curious. But Trump’s election belies them, as will his re-election.

 

White working class in three states made the difference, and they're not particularly religious. If the Christian right wing was the majority in this country, there wouldn't have ever been a Democratic House or Senate majority since Roe v Wade, let alone a Democratic President.

 

Would Trump have won with only blue collar workers and not the Evangelicals. I suspect not.

BTW—What was the largest voting block to support him? I’ve assumed it was the White Christian Nationalists. Perhaps my assumption is in correct. You have any data?

 

"White Christian Nationalists"

What is that? I sure don't have any data on that "group" since I don't recall it being mentioned as part of Trump's winning coalition.

However changing the subject to real groups, Trump probably couldn't have won without the Evangelicals, but they are a minority group. In the same way that Blacks are a minority group, but Democrats can't win an election without them.

 

Ok. Then what was the largest voting block for Trump?

And explain this:
“And while research showed economic dissatisfaction and prejudice toward immigrants and minorities to be a strong indicator of support for Trump, one study found that the best way to determine vote choice in 2016 was by gauging adherence to Christian nationalist ideology.”
https://morningconsult.com/2019/04/...rate-views-christian-nationalism-as-a-threat/

Now, if the Black populace isn’t supporting Trump, and the Hispanics aren’t supporting Trump, and his largest and strongest support is the Christian Nationalists, just what color are they? Native American? I doubt it.

White Christian America believes America was created for them, and they are willing to share, but they will never surrender to the immoral Progressives. And while they may not be a majority, I suspect they may the largest minority group. Maybe I’m wrong. Trump’s reelection may prove my point.

 

I don't know what?

 

See edited version.

 

Ah so "Christian Nationalism" is another made up term. Reminds me of the feared, "Dominionists."

 

You on my planet?

 

Who is the most prominent US Christian Nationalist?
What are the think tanks, Universities, or PACS that identify as Christian Nationalist?

 

Only communist are arsonist? Wow I never knew that.

 

Damn that FOX News!

 

~ All drama and theatrics with this crop of goofy Democrats. `

 

They are nothing if not dramatic.

 

This actually addresses the claim the gulag wasn't so bad:

 

Oh. You want some type of official sanctioning body? Ok.

“Yet it is not evangelicals but Catholic intellectuals who are helping to lead efforts to capitalize on the opportunity presented by Mr. Trump’s nationalism. Catholic involvement is especially prominent in two recent initiatives. The first was a manifestopublished by First Things this March advocating a new style of conservatism that would, among other things, “embrace the new nationalism” and “jealously guard” the space opened up by the “Trump phenomenon.” Among the signatories were Patrick Deneen of the University of Notre Dame, C. C. Pecknold of the Catholic University of America and Sohrab Ahmari, an op-ed editor at The New York Post.”—https://www.americamagazine.org/pol...unities-fault-lines-new-christian-nationalism

The Manifesto:
“There is no returning to the pre-Trump conservative consensus that collapsed in 2016. Any attempt to revive the failed conservative consensus that preceded Trump would be misguided and harmful to the right.

“ [While] Consensus conservatism played a heroic role in defeating Communism in the last century...”

“...this conservatism too often tracked the same lodestar liberalism did—namely, individual autonomy. The fetishizing of autonomy paradoxically yielded the very tyranny that consensus conservatives claim most to detest.”

“https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2019/03/against-the-dead-consensus

You have the names of some of the leaders, their manifesto, and their march towards a Religious tyranny with their crusader Trump leading the way.

it exist, it is real, and they will not give the country back to Progressives, and it’s why Trump won’t be impeached, and will be re-elected.

The Left created Trump; the White Christian Nationalists’ hatred of the Left and it’s secular collective pseudo-individualism fuels his quest for unlimited power.

 

As I suspected. This "Christian Nationalist" movement, which you claim is Trump's largest voting bloc, is lead by three people no one has heard of.