Woman Accuses Joe Biden Of Sexual Assault

You wouldn't know independent. It requires thinking. Not 24/7 reality tv or radio talking points.

Well done tho.

 

You've offered nothing.

Now personal attacks.

The illusion you're attempting to create is entertaining though, please keep it up.

 

First, President Trump was not found guilty by any investigation.

Second, Tara Reade's Rapist opposes Presumption of Innocence for anyone other then himself.

If Tara Reade's Rapist wins Presidency, then many men who voted for him will be convicted without evidence.

 

Tara Reade's Rapist is guilty by the standards of evidence he set himself.

 

Saying it under oath.......is. Ask a lawyer.

 

You dish it?

 

Unfortunately Tara Reade's Rapist has worked hard to ensure Presumption of Guilt for others. Such as University students. Should he still be presumed innocent?

 

You know ecactly what i mean and you're trying to argue based on a technicality.

You have nothing.....just like ford had.

 

Videotape or it didn't happen.

And, even if it did, the Statute of Limitations is long past.

He Said/She Said.

Nothing to see here. Time to move on.

 

Well I am sure Joe does not remember doing that, or much of anything else for that matter........

 

Well.. I'm referring to what you're referring to.

I mean, I'm assuming at least you know she was not questioned by the FBI. They were supposed to investigate her allegations, but never asked her what her allegations were. They did interview a second victim. And this second victim gave them details of witnesses.... they never interviewed a single one of those witnesses.

Why? Because Republican Senators limited the investigation to a background check.

Look... this has been debated on this forum ... to no end. It's clear Republicans did not want "proof". They wanted to get a justice who would do Trump's bidding without questioning anything. And that if he strayed from the "plan", they could set straight right away.

As far as him being guilty.... there is no doubt. Or at least, not a reasonable doubt that he did what Dr. Ford said he did.

If you want facts, this is where you start.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/kavanaugh-vs-dr-ford-testimony-the-lies.542915/

 

What "inconsistency"?

Joe Biden: "Believe All Women" (Except The One Accusing Me Of Sexual Assault)

Crickets from the left...

 

Guarantee Trump brings her to the debates.

 

Lib #1: video tape or it didn’t happen.

Lib #2: no video tape, but there’s no doubt it happened.

How about we put the two of you in a steel cage and the winner can give us a singular, non contradictory and consistent lib opinion.

 

This is what you said.

 

What inconsistency. It was hot...so no stockings. Then it was cold... she said that ~ 'cold' ~ on two occasions, despite first saying it was hot.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...ies-not-credible-kavanaugh-column/1497661002/

She has zero credibility. The other guy she said was in the room said he never saw Kavenaugh do the thingsngs she alleged.

The left wanted to destroy a person's life with zero proof. Nothing but a single accuser who couldn't keep her story straight.

But Biden's accuser is to be dismissed without thought...all because the accused is a democrat.

 

And i said 'you know what i mean'.....which you do.

But you clearly can't respond.

Also, ford is not credible.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...ies-not-credible-kavanaugh-column/1497661002/

 

Ok.

So, what of it?

Bottom line:

Without evidence there is NO PROOF.

Without Proof there is NO CASE.

Even IF there "Was a Case", the Statute of Limitations has tolled so it can't be pressed.

In other words, nothing to see here.

Back to the drawing board for Biden's Opposition.

It is what it is.

 

Totally agree.

Now how many times do i have to tell you that my issue is with the left's blatant and unapologetic hypocrisy?

Do you get that at all?

You said, in this thread, 'kavenaugh raped ford' and you do nothing but push for this to be dismissed. Politics is so far above everything else to the left that they can't even hide this stuff. You'd think they'd at least want to attempt to seem credible.

 

That would be absolutely savage.

 

Im wagering you aren't an actual lawyer because you didn't grasp what she said (or are trying to spin it).

It was warm outside-so no leggings, later being sexually assaulted against the marble interior walls of the Capitol were cold.

 

No. I don't recall her saying it was cold.

 

When am I supposed to not simply read your words and give them their ordinary meaning? You said:

That is wrong.