Why did you become 'religious'?

(J)oshua 1:1-2 "Now after the death of Moses the servant of the LORD it came to pass, that the LORD spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' minister, saying, 2Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel."


Let us see how Moses might have felt when he needed to keep to the laws given to him by The LORD and God and how he might have felt when those that were being led into the Promised Land began to rebel against The LORD and God while 'they' were out in the middle of the wilderness after having 'agreed' to do what The LORD and God was to instruct 'them' upon... And how might Moses have felt if after many opportunities for 'any' to return back to Egypt in the beginning 'stages' of this journey, 'they' argued against such return and continued onward with their 'voiced agreement' to 'follow'. So how might Moses or any of those that truly wanted to enter into The Promised Land have felt if, after so much following after The LORD and God while witnessing and receiving 'Divine clear revelations' that 'They' were leading and continually with 'them', that when 'some' or 'many' began to find life in the wilderness comfortable enough, that they began 'rebelling'??


why did Moses, who was 'faithful' to the end of his life, NOT receive what he set out to do; which was to enter into The Promised Land? Although maybe not 'promised' that he would, he sure had the heart and soul and might and mind to carry his desire out unto his very own end; while still 'leading' those that agreed to obey and listen to The LORD and God, while not yet in the Promised Land but in the wilderness.


So while those that left Egypt were supposed to have entered into The Promised Land with and by The Commandments of The LORD and God that they were actually carrying, the 2 tablets of stone with the 'commandments' of The LORD and God written with/by His Finger, and although they 'agreed', voluntarily and not forced, to obey and follow so that they would enter into The Promised Land, how was it that they did not while the Temple ministers and servers, the Levites and the family of the High Priest, Aaron, were faithful and true unto the end of their own 'faithful' life(s)?

 

It should be 'why did you give up this religious nonense and start being rational?'

 

Salvation is of the '(J)ews', so it reads.

So when these persons left Egypt to enter into the Promised Land, while 'agreeing' to listen/obey/follow' The LORD and God, 'agreeing to not rebel', who or what persons were these supposed to have 'met' when and upon their crossing into The Promised Land? Who were/was on the 'other side' awaiting 'them', maybe with high hopes and gladnesses? Or was The LORD and God ONLY over these persons in The Wilderness?


Who was first? Moses or Abraham? The crossing over the Jordan River or (J)acob entering into Egypt?

Was (J)acob's son, (J)udah, before, during or after this 'exodus'?


Might Moses have been given opportuntiy(ies) to leave the rebellious to receive why he began in the first place; The Promised Land? And if yes, why might he not have received that opportunity for himself?

This reminds me of the 'denari' earned. The workers all agreed for 1 denarius. Even those who began their work later on in that day as well as the very first that began work in that day. And at the end of that day, each received what they 'agreed' upon; which was a denarius. Monies enough for 'dinner' during those times.

So when Moses was given that opportunity to receive his denarius, why might he not have accepted but remained among the other 'workers' who did not enter into The Promised Land?

Maybe 'life' became 'good enough' for them to no longer have that 'need' to follow and obey The LORD and God?

 

you become religious as a direct result of coming to the 'age of reason' if nothing previous exists. If something previous exists you also become religious as a result of previous understanding of the world around us. as an example, dont put your fingers in the fire, its not good. Dont murder rape steal, its not good, you can either believe previous understanding or find out by reinventing the wheel, these are basic religious 'values' in most peoples religions, the next step being culture.

 

So what was Moses' reasoning for him remaining with the others?

Numbers 14:
"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long will this people provoke me? and how long will it be ere they believe me, for all the signs which I have shewed among them? 12I will smite them with the pestilence, and disinherit them, and will make of thee a greater nation and mightier than they.

Moses Intercedes for the People

13And Moses said unto the LORD, Then the Egyptians shall hear it, (for thou broughtest up this people in thy might from among them; )14And they will tell it to the inhabitants of this land: for they have heard that thou LORD art among this people, that thou LORD art seen face to face, and that thy cloud standeth over them, and that thou goest before them, by day time in a pillar of a cloud, and in a pillar of fire by night. 15Now if thou shalt kill all this people as one man, then the nations which have heard the fame of thee will speak, saying, 16Because the LORD was not able to bring this people into the land which he sware unto them, therefore he hath slain them in the wilderness. 17And now, I beseech thee, let the power of my Lord be great, according as thou hast spoken, saying, 18The LORD is longsuffering, and of great mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression, and by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation. 19Pardon, I beseech thee, the iniquity of this people according unto the greatness of thy mercy, and as thou hast forgiven this people, from Egypt even until now."



So what was Moses' reasoning?

The brief explanation of this section reads, Moses intercedes for the people. Would you find this accurate?

 

hmm.. let's see... if i was one of those on the other side of the Jordan awaiting for those on the other side, those that were led out of Egypt, would I think that The Holy Bible was religious nonsense?

Or might I decide to 'add' to the propaganda of smearing Their Holy Name(s)? Why? Because 'my brothers and sisters' didn't know how to 'keep to their agreement', I guess. After all, IF The LORD and God were 'GOOD', then surely They would have not made my brothers and sisters so rebellious at/in heart, right?


Or was my brothers and/or sisters 'saints' while I was around but devils when I was not? Would their word stand to rebelling, even unto lying, unto The LORD to Their 'faces'? And would I believe my saintly brothers and sisters over The LORD and God because I 'KNOW' with absolute certainty that my brothers and sisters WOULD NEVER be so 'loose' to their well being, right?


Obviously The LORD and God want my saintly brothers and sisters to be wrecked for some 'jealous' personal reason. How else would any be able to give explanation. Or could they truly be 'wrong doers' when not putting on their 'angel of light' display?


But IF They were GOOD then They would never have destroyed any; such as those that were awaiting on the 'other side' of the Jordan as well as those that were 'destroyed' while being in the desert, such as Korah.. right?

Well, yes, I guess. But are you certain that those on the other side were truly 'destroyed' and not 're-moved'? not removed as in a removal of their breathing life, but a re-moving of them to another location? And are you sure, without a shadow of doubt, that Korah and those that 'the earth' swallowed up, didn't fall into those crevices on their own due to their own choice to separate themselves from The One(s) that gave sight, hearing, perception? Might they have fallen in on their own when they separated themselves from the True Protectors of 'steps'?

 

Can any

Can any be absolutely certain that 'life' can be lived without Their 'direct' Provisions, even their own 'breath' that each takes? I mean, can this type of absolute 'certainty' be 'taught' as foundational and scriptural, in or out of secularism?


If They were Good, then surely, there would be no 'suffering', right? Damn! I have to take a huge crap but I'm constipated. Maybe They should be 'Good' and blot me out of 'existence'. I mean, IF, they truly were Good.

___


So those on the other side were awaiting. They got to meet 2 original persons that left Egypt. (J)oshua and Caleb.. These were the only 2 that remained of the entire group that left Egypt together..

So those on the other side meets (J)oshua, Caleb and whoever else was born in the wilderness. They might have thought, 'I thought you guys left Egypt.. That's what we were informed. Where's all the other Egyptians and sons of (J)acob.. You guys don't even know a thing about Egypt and you guys even ask us what Egypt is... are you sure you guys are not spies'?

Even (J)oshua and Caleb didn't know enough about Egypt. They were both little children, maybe less than 5 years of age, when they were 'led out' of Egypt.. by their own 'parents and guardians'.

And out of the whole that left Egypt together, (J)oshua and Caleb being 2 of that whole, only they, (J)oshua and Caleb entered into The Promised Land from that 'whole'. All the others that entered into The Promised Land with (J)oshua and Caleb were 'born' while the whole was in the desert, the wilderness.


Or was it 'the Devil'/'Satan' that 'made' them 'do it'?

 

the immaculate concept of the 'devil/Satan' being a 'fallen holy angel' is a man made/thought up, concept. Just as the conception, the mental conception, of the 'sinless' life of Marayam, the mother of Christ. If Marayam was truly 'sinless' BEFORE haven given birth to Christ Messiah, that would make her the 1st sinless one before Christ Messiah's sinless life.

Immaculate conceptualization... almost philosophical.

And so we now live with, 'fallen holy angels'; let's not discredit the 'nephilim'.. the sinlessness of Marayam... the concept that blood and flesh enter into 'Heaven'; Eli(j)ah and Enoch having broken that 'rule' of Heaven... and what else might we have, today? Oh yeah.. that the rebellion of Heaven where the 'devil' and 'his angels' is/are cast out and whirled onto Earth, pre Eden, occurred pre Eden..

Oh.. another.. that 'Satan', that serpent of old that 'deceived' Eve into partaking of that apple(?)... wait a minute.. where the heck does it say it was an apple?

Besides.. that that 'serpent' who was ordered to always crawl upon its belly all the days of his life(?), who said the serpent was a male, was broken and counted as non existent when that serpent decided to become a shape shifter.. After all, he/she might have been a 'holy angel' at one previous time, right? A created one, the serpent, having greater strengths than The Ones, multiple ones, Whom created/made/gave life to, him/her/them, all by him/her selfs. Wow..

I mean, no wonder why They might 'laugh'.

 

I hope you enjoy posting all this stuff. It doesn't raise much attention, but you don't seem to care.

 

But wait! There's more. For just another doll-ar, you can sign YOUR name along with this wonderful package deal. And you get the whole bundle pack for only 19.95. Shipping and handling varies from State to State. Don't delay. Hurry.. Order yours today...


Dilemma and choices.. But IF The LORD and God were Good, then...

and besides... do I order the 'fallen holy angel' package or do I order the laughing package? I think I like goodness over wasting monies.


If only I had an extra doll-ar.. dang.

*got an extra doll-ar?

*job.. I need to get myself(?) a paying 'job'?


Proverbs 22:2 "The rich and poor meet together: the LORD is the maker of them all."


hmm. I guess this means that the LORD is okay with gentrification?


*got an extra doll-ar?


Dang.. I keep forgetting.. The others... The Governments and 'their' personal desires, also, matter to The LORD... I keep forgetting.


As for me and my household... we're enough, unto ourselves, to handle as it is..

Who's cooking tonight? Who's doing the clean up? Who's taking out the trash? Who's going to work tomorrow? Who's not? Okay.. Goodnight Bobby Sue. Goodnight Margaret. Goodnight ma.. Goodnight pa. Goodnight Scruffy. Goodnight Billy Joe. Goodnight Neighbors...

 

NO TRESPASSING






So.. gentrification. The LORD's agenda/idea to allow for humans to get 'along'?


*they were such lovely families. i wonder why they were unable to keep up financially?


poor is the home who live without responsibilities. the previous home residents had ma, dad, grandpa, grandma, children/grandchildren living there. now the residents of the same house is 2 young adult aged newly living together, so it seems, 'couple'?

Ma's and Pa's usually 'don't enjoy' needing to rebuild in a 'new' home; every 10 or so years, right? Definitely not Grandparents still together.


Regardless... look to the brighter side. their parents must be superbly proud of them.


Here's a 'kicker'.

1 person rents a studio, non windowed, for 2000 doll-ars per month. Yearly, the rent is 24,000 doll-ar(s), an entry level salary earning for some. But this person is seeking to live in a 5000 doll-ar(s) a month apartment... one with a window, maybe even more....

*Milk... does it really do a body, good? Maybe when I was a tot drinking my mother's milk, it was doing my body good. But who's milk am I drinking now after the age of 'consent'?

2 things that do NOT grow on trees..
Milk and Monies.


And if I ever hear that males produce milk, AGAIN, I'm going to turn Vegan, dang it!

 

Milk is for tots, silly wabbit.

synonyms:
baby · babe · infant · toddler · newborn · tiny tot · child · little one · mite · bairn · wean · sprog · young 'un · rug rat · neonate

baby brother, baby sister... etc...


*it's not fair that he gets to drink all the milk... just not right. You know that I can't have my 'rights' stripped, right? especially my smart phone.. even at dinner time.

just joshing..


Texas father arrested after taking away daughter’s cell phone: “I was being a parent”

https://fox6now.com/2016/01/27/texa...ay-daughters-cell-phone-i-was-being-a-parent/


an example of micro gentrification?


Deuteronomy 7:
'When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; 2And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: 3Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. 4For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. 5But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. 6For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."


huh? all this/these spoken truths to a 'people' that will not even enter into The Promised Land? what?

Maybe what is being said here is:
this what 'you' guys are going to end up behaving as... so try NOT to act so wickedly...

 

Deuteronomy 7
"The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: 8But because the LORD loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 9Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;"



and I would assume, I could assume, even rightly and justifiably that the King of Salem, Melchizedek, was in alright standing with The LORD and God although he was one of those that were on the 'other side', right?


But wait 1 minute. The sons of (J)acob were the ones that were being freed from the slavery and bondage, right? It was the family of (J)acob that was being freed. So what could they have done that was so 'wrong' to get this kind of 'correction'? You were not the most of people, but the least. What could they have done?

Because fine and dandy... still as sons and grandsons and great grandsons, etc.. of (J)acob, what could they really have done while in Egypt, after Egypt, during the Exodus, that they were 'reprimanded' like this?

Well, let's take a look.

(J)oshua and Caleb were the only 2 who were of the original whole that actually crossed over the jordan. So who were (J)oshua and Caleb? (J)oshua was the son of Nun, maybe of the tribe of Ephraim? Can Caleb was the son of Jephunneh.

Jephunneh (יְפֻנֶּה) is a biblical name which means "for whom a way is prepared", and was the name of two biblical figures:

• A descendant of Judah, and father of Kenaz and Caleb the spy or scout, who appears to have belonged to an Edomitish tribe called Kenezites, from Kenaz their founder. See (Numbers 13:6 etc.; Num. 32:12 etc.; Josh 14:14 etc.; 1 Chr 4:15).

so, (J)oshua of Ephraim, one of (J)oseph's sons while (J)oseph was 2nd only to Pharaoh while in Egypt and Caleb who is associated within the lineage of (J)acob's older brother Esau.

 

So whom did The LORD love in these verses, again?

And who entered into the Promised Land with those on the other side maybe anticipating a festive occasion? And who caused what problem where, again?



But what IF there would have been 'true' obedient, faithful sons of (J)acob that did enter into The Promised Land?


So the sons of Abram/ham that was promised unto Abram/ham as going to possess/receive the Promised Land were re-entering the very place that Promise was 'given' to Abram/ham... in the land of (?)..??

Genesis 14:13 "And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram."


Genesis 15:
"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:

19The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites."


However, Abram/ham is not really a 'father' to his other brothers... but is a 'father' to his own 'seed'....

 

so if Kenezites is the same as Kenizzites, which Caleb could have been, and if Kenezite is of 'Esau' in some 'direct' relation, then yes, Caleb would be a 'son' of Abram/ham because Esau was a son of Abram/ham's son, Y'tschaq, making Esau Abram/ham's grandson.


So Christ Messiah came to 'save' the lost house of (J)oshua and Caleb and any other 'son/grandson' of Abram/ham who left Egypt in that 'whole'.

And this is how all Y'srael, or Yaaqob, son of Y'tschaq, son of Abram/ham will be 'saved' as it is read in The Holy Bible.

This 'salvation' is a Promise made unto Abram/ham and to his 'seed(s)'.... For the other 'sons' of the brothers of Abram, seeing that Abram left the land of Ur of Chaldee only after 9 generations of living 'after' the flood, where Noah, Ham, Shem, (J)apeth with their wives were the only survivors to begin again; to them this same promise of 'salvation' was not given as a Promise.


And it was within the 4th generation after the landing of the arc, that the 'language' was confounded. and with this 'breaking' into many languages, the migrations and the different branches of 'languaged families' became as 'separated'.

Question: "In what way was the earth divided in Peleg’s time?"

Answer: In 1 Chronicles 1:19 it is noted that the earth was divided in the days of Peleg: “Two sons were born to Eber: One was named Peleg, because in his time the earth was divided; his brother was named Joktan” (see also verse 25). The detail that “the earth was divided” has caused some to speculate about the exact nature of the division.


https://www.gotquestions.org/earth-divided-Peleg.html

 

Genesis 11:
"And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. 2And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. 3And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. 4And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. 5And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. 6And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. 7Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. 8So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. 9Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth."


this in the 4th generation after the landing of the arc. 5 generations later, Abram departs from Ur of Chaldea, which is within current Iraq, just as Babylon and the governate of Babylon is a real 'city'/territory within Iraq.


So is babylon really 'bad'? even according to The Holy Bible?

not necessarily. The Holy Bible 'warns' Babylon that if they are not careful that unclean birds and activities and ideas and such with its adherents will enter in and turn babylon into a desolated 'place' of uncleanness and unrighteousness.


So what is an unclean bird, or an unclean frog?

a 'fowl' not in the clean category of 'fowls' allowed to be 'eaten' for/as food.


Revelation 18
"And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. 3For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies."



of 'whose' wine of the wrath of 'her' fornication? who are the kings of the earth who have committed fornication with 'her' and who are the merchants of the earth who are 'waxed rich' through the abundance of 'her' delicacies?


Was Babylon once a 'halal' place, in Truth and not in guise?


Is the 'rumor' true that certain Arabic speaking persons, even princes of nobles, seek to 'question' the validity of why eating 'pork' is FORBIDDED/FORBIDDEN, as in 'thou shalt not'? Kind of what other English speaking persons ask towards the 'thou shalt nots' of The Holy Bible coming from the view point of 'good/bad' from a personal freedom point of view, to be able to 'choose' and not be 'forced'?

 

Why am I 'bad' because I do this or that? Why can't I 'choose' what to do with 'my' life? Why do I have to acknowledge God? Why do I have to be religious? etc....

Why do I have to....

the 'have to'... as in violation/infringement to/on personal 'choices/decisions', etc... free will.


Why cannot I eat pork?

Because to agree to the agreement which The LORD and God gives as Their rules, requires the agreer to hold to their part of the agreement which They also will keep with the 'agreer'. However not all is 'forced' to place their name upon Their contract. But for those that do, they are obligated to keep to the contract and not 'change' Their Contract to Their 'detriment' or even to 'additional' stipulations, etc...

Tithing never involved 'monies'.. It was pertaining to bringing in a tenth of the increase of crops and food(s) and even 'wines'.


So where does the 'problem' arise then?

From the unnecessary 'attacking' towards these 'agreers' who have signed their names upon Their contract.

Why the attacks towards them? Easy. Thou can and nothing says thou can not.

Although they have been gifted with life and the sustaining of life; even unto the 'bad' ones, they use this gift against those who Praise the Life Givers and Life Sustainers. Why?

Because even with Their gifts and Sustenance, they still can and do not NEED to not... and this not needing to ONLY be towards the other persons who Praise and give Thanks unto Them but unto Them Themselves, even directly.


If this is not a mental 'delusion' of sorts, then these persons, many in number(?) and in every land and language(?) must be for 'personal reasons'.

 

One should never call what is 'partial' as 'impartial'. One is gifted while another is not. Gifted but why Whom? Personal relatives or contractual reasons? Otherwise if the guidelines of the 'contract' is broken and not upheld, what good would that 'Company' serve except to be 'flattered' into providing? And for any within these partial non contractual guidelines to continue on, they are actually seeking the downfall of that 'Company'. How? By breaching the 'agreers' agreement to Their Contract. Bad for those that agree to/with Their Contract, good for those that might not really agree to Their Contract.

For Them to do as this would be as a Harvard Law school graduate forgetting how to speak the language they learned in Harvard in.


Unfortunately, Their Contract was never given/written in English. Modern, English, at least.


For any that want to enter into Their Contract as an 'agreer' but not having the proper materials to do so would require some reading of the fine lines to be done before bringing forth any complaints towards Their Contract. In other words, not all suffering comes directly from Them.. Especially if They are asked to 'keep those sufferings' away.

For those that do not ask but expect would be as agreers to Their Contract; expecting what Their Contract has already 'promised' as returns, etc...


A contract is in a language. Let no foul 'language' be among you. Words are little parts of a language.

 

And by far, I would not think of telling a native speaker of a language that he/she has no understanding to his/her words even when I have no knowledge how to speak that language. I cannot tell a native Spanish language speaker how to properly speak Spanish if I don't even have knowledge of the language myself.


If for any reason there is reason to question which language is primary, look to the currency you live within... It is written in that language, primary. There are places within a primary main language that deals with other 'primary' languages in forms of currency. Some places accept foreign currencies while living under/within the Constitutional language.

And for any primary language speaker to have intentions to 'not assist' but 'hinder' another's well being while both are under the same Constitution is what faces most of the Countries today.


This is why I'm pro separation and leery to pro unionization. I would NOT enjoy living with others who seek to hinder me..

And it's within questions like these where the disagreements of entitlement(s), as in contractual entitlements of promises, come in. Constitutions do 'promise' to a certain extent.


I would never ask or urge or try to have a North Korean resident and citizen speak against their Constitution. When those citizens and residents continue to hear smears and mud to their 'lack of rights' and to their 'lack of humane treatment' and to their 'lack of freedom and joy', those opinions are asking them, subtily, to speak out against their oppressors, their Government. All being done out from under 'promised' protection(s) which is/are granted to me under this constitution within this room, paid for by whomever... instead of being on that battlefield, i'd rather ignite from safety. From being a 'busy body' around here, I had to become a 'busy body' in someone else's hometown or languaged Constitution. I do not have rights to speak against another Constitutional culture... especially in a form of benefitting them when they have better knowledge how to 'benefit' themselves.

 

When in God's non Blasphemed Name has women been voted as the number 1 'sends' from within Military?

*don't forget to take the kids.. they might really get scared..


This is something I do not understand. The replacing of police officers. Why even have a police force if the newly recruited, brought in from other places, do worse jobs than the original ones? They might appear better looking but if that is even true, wouldn't they want to marry and settle down, eventually?


It must be for a few certain female officers who have different preferences towards 'men'. Maybe the original police weren't their type... to have googly eyes towards.


Whatever you do, ladies, stay in your well provided for Community and learn to be appreciative that you are being 'protected' over by the local 'men'. God forbid that those local men you learned to trust under is replaced by other 'strange acting' men.

 

Have you heard of 'compromise'?

an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions.

settle a dispute by mutual concession.

accept standards that are lower than is desirable.

bring into disrepute or danger by indiscreet, foolish, or reckless behavior.


It happens in Churches also..



but here:
accept standards that are lower than is desirable.

to 'accept' standards that are lower than... the established 'standards'?


standards are standard. they're the predominant language. with its standard currency. with its standard exchange rate. with its standard state tax %.

Currency, sometimes, is much more 'standard' than measurements. Unless I have knowledge of how to properly measure, I just have to take their word that it will not break any nearby fixtures.

Measurements are a skill that needs to be learned.
Currency is a 'trade' that needs to be 'counted'.. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.. etc...

A 10 year old might be able to exact change from a 20 doll-ar bill. Give him a hundred and the 10 year old might come home with excessive or less change than correct. Why? Because as a 10 year old, dealing with numbers having to do with 100 is not as frequent as dealing with numbers that do with 20.

100 days is how many months?
20 days is how many months?


how many hands and feet would you need to have 50 fingers and 50 toes?


1 Standard human has 10 fingers and 10 toes.
It would take 5 standard humans to have 50 fingers and 50 toes.

For measurement, it would require skill to have 5 Standard equal measured human(s).

 

are you ok?

 

So yes.. currency is easier to keep 'standardized' than 'measurements' by the general population, en large.


a group of 100 making 1 whole, as in percentages... 1 cent is as 1 percent as 100 cent(s) is as 100 percent. However, it might take 102 pieces to make 1 whole. Wholly completed... etc...

 

Don't think intelligence levels. Think quality or quantity?

Noone forces unto Excellence.. not even Kings or Queens or Princes or Princesses.

It is a personal choice/decision. for personal reasons.. not to replace the 'standards' but to have 'visions' towards a more 'excellent' future.

Air quality, water quality, quantifying 'amount dues'. How do you 'measure' a studio/non windowed space to approximate 2000 doll-ar(s) per 30/31 day(s)?

How do you quantify the need of 5000 doll-ar(s) to have a studio/windowed/maybe more per same 30/31 day(s)?

Price per square foot.


Manhattan real estate is an average of $1,773 per square foot, according to NeighborhoodX. The next most expensive area on a per square foot basis is San Francisco, which averages $902 per square foot. That’s followed by Boston at $586 per square foot, Washington D.C. at $515 and Miami Beach at $504.


https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/11/man...-most-expensive-in-the-us-per-square-foo.html


for 30/31 day cycles or for :

Commodities
Commodities are physical products you can buy. They could be agricultural products like wheat, barley and corn, or energy products like oil, coal or solar power. Precious metals like gold and silver are some of the most common commodities.

Commodities investing runs the risk that the price of the product will go down quickly. For instance, political actions can greatly change the value of something like oil, while weather can impact the value of agricultural products.

https://smartasset.com/investing/types-of-investment

Prices set by?? A self regulated 'scale' that comes up from the Earth?

If no, then would 'easing' the weight of costs lessen the Earth's 'weighing scale'?



Not interested! What's for dinner???

 

No more Presidents
and all the wars will end
One united world under God.


um.. okay.. who's taking out the trash still?

I'm not going to do it, you do it.. I'm not going to do it, let him do it...
I'm not going to do it... Ask grandma to do it.


and all he left us was some unpaid for bills. papa was a rolling stone.


Don't think intelligence levels. Think, should I sign up?



there is a saying. don't want to do the time, don't get caught.

There is another saying. don't want to do the time, don't do it at all.