He was warned. He broke the law. The same law would apply to ANYONE, irrespective of their job/position, that hosts a gathering of X number of people. He (and/or those around him) are trying to use a "get out of jail free" card when it is not applicable.
Where did you get the data that tells you the death rate compared to the infection rate? Give a link.
Not interested. If you want to dismiss the claim dismiss it. If you want to find out for yourself find out for yourself.
I've done it hundreds of times in the passes and it never meant a damned thing. I will no longer waste my time searching out sources for people to ignore. If this means you dismiss my claims. Dismiss away. Just understand because of your petty little response here I will never present a source to you. Don't ever bother asking for one again. If you can't handle this ignore me.
You keep asking me to do something I've said I am never going to do again. That comes off as obsessive. If you were going to dismiss my claim you would have. It seems to stick in your craw that I'm not playing your game.
"KEEP" asking you? Nope, I gave you just the ONE opportunity to support your claim and you didn't take it. I thought that it would be clear that I have dismissed it. Although that doesn't mean that I'm saying you're wrong - you could be right! Presenting you with an opportunity to support you claim is an interesting understanding of game playing.
See I already explained that to you and you couldn't even read a few sentences. So why would I go to the trouble of presenting you with articles when you can't even read a few sentences?
Yes, you explained why you were unable to support your claim - because you didn't want to. However, I have to believe that you might not even have anything TO support your claim.