Question about white race based organizations

The BLM is in the news and we have an idea regarding what they are about. Are there any organizations, be it political, religious - or otherwise that are concerned with the advancement, preservation, and protection of whites? In other words, is there any white based organization that is equivalent to the BLM and, if so, who is its leader and what does he or she espouse?

 

Most conservatives, true conservatives follow the colorblind philosophy. You are judged by your behavior, and character, not categorized by skin color.

There are white organizations out there but they are fringe and not accepted by rightwing.

 

Since most on the right think BLM is a hate group here are some that are equivalent. Even though there may be just as many whites in BLM as blacks but here goes....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:White_supremacist_groups_in_the_United_States

 

Thanks anyway. I tried looking at that. Most of the groups don't have a website; some are defunct; others are mere hate groups.

Therein is the question. What group (s) stand up for white people, but are not "fringe?" Is it not true that any group that would seek to preserve their Anglo heritage would be considered "fringe?" If not, what organization balances out the extremes of the BLM?

 

Is there a need for Whites to have an orgaization such as BLM.? If so why and what exactly are the reasons Whites Ned an organization such as BLM?

Have there been any Whites killed by Black policemen in the last 6 months? If do his many and where?


Is there a Bkack Zimmerman type of creature who likes to kill White teens? If so who is he and his many White teens has this Black Zimmerman creature killed?

 

The KKK exist. Perhaps you can try getting in contact with your local klansman?

 

No where in your OP did you say " but not fringe "
As a matter of fact you said political, religious or OTHERWISE.
Please forgive me if I was in error.

 

I can't think of any. Anybody that claims they are supporting "anglo heritage" or something similar would instantly be labeled racist and probably firebombed.

 

That's a hate group, not one trying to preserve Anglo heritage.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_white_nationalist_organizations

All the ones I'm aware of are on this list. Some of the ones on this list are just being demonized by the SPLC/etc because they're conservative and happen to be primarily made up of white people... but some of them are legitimately ethnocentric. You'll have to research and judge which is which for yourself because of the common practice to just label anything right of Marx as racist...

 

You're right, I was not specific enough.

 

Actually I did contact a KKK leader to ask what he was doing about the current situation. He said they were doing all they could do. So, I went to his website. I did not see his plan of action: no forum for discussion, no think tank to study issues, no training for political activism, no organized events, no plan for counter-demonstrations.

Their platform did not seem to indicate a "hate group" per se, but I simply failed to see where having an Internet presence, griping, and selling KKK goodies does anything to benefit anyone or build a bridge of understanding. I might be wrong, but I'm not seeing it.

 

Groups like the SPLC, SCLC and the ADL have become the de facto clearinghouse for determining what a hate group consists of. In none of those organizations can I find a listing of any person or group that works for the advancement, preservation and protection of white people that meets with their seal of approval.

 

I came to this board to see if anyone here had such experience with any of these groups. What I find disturbing is that Wikipedia generally relies on the the ADL and / or the SPLC for their information and no person and no group is known outside of the information provided by those biased groups that are waging a war of genocide against whites. In other words, this IS part of my research - the search to find someone who knows of a group or a person and is willing to share that group / individual's goals / objectives... maybe vouch for the leadership.

 

Go to Chicago.
There is Ukrainian village there.
They have lots of Ukrainian ethnic based groups. These are minority groups, even though they are white.

 

It'll prolly take more than 39 minutes of research to sift through the SPLC/etc's propaganda vs all the various groups actual positions to determine the truth...

But at the end of the day, the only ones that are going to successfully protect white people are the ones that seek to protect all people.

I'd would recomend looking into local volunteer Civil Defense groups, aka 'militias.'

 

When we have a time in history where whites are being demonized - their flags being taken down; their monuments, plaques, memorials and statues vandalized / removed; when the names of schools, streets and government buildings are being changed so as to erase the history of the white man; when we have sunk to censorship so as to penalize people for thought crimes; when even tv series can no longer be aired or streamed because somebody is "offended" by symbols or language of our history and culture, then I would say a need exists. The BLM is fighting a war, ISIS style, and the best way to defeat any people is to erase their history.

I cannot research the last six months for you; the Internet is doing good to provide figures within the last two to three years and no more recent than that.

A black Zimmerman? Have you tried Facebook? They seem to be pretty good at posting relevant news stories that don't make national news. So, can you answer my questions?

 

No such group exists; never has existed; never will exist. All people are different and, as such, require different mechanisms to insure that their Rights are respected. Cops want special laws that increase penalties for crimes if the victim is a cop; blacks want special laws so that people cannot even think about them negatively without it being a "hate crime." If what you say were indeed a goal of the American people, we'd tell all these other groups to pound sand. All crimes would carry the same penalty regardless of who the victim was and what the lawbreaker had as a motive for committing the crime.

As a co-founder of this country's oldest and most continuous civilian militia, I can tell you they have NO interest in this subject.

 

I am well aware of the Ukie sections of Chicago. There is the Ukrainian cultural center and the competing churches of Catholic vs Orthodox and a very strong post of Ukrainian American Veterans and so and on and on. The Ukie emigres ( such as my parents) of post WWII gave a great boost to the Ukrainian diaspora base in places Chicago. I have been to Ukie conventions and conferences in Chicago. Got to see a Cubs Dodger game once with a Ukie group.

Ukie obviously means Ukrainians and is pronounced. ' You Key'. Our parent's the old Ukie people of WWII age group hated that name that us Baby Boomer immigrant kids invented. Funny now we are the Old Ukies now that the WWII generation is almost gone.

 

First of all I tried Facebook and noticed many Russian trolls who I was able to pick out because of my Eastern European background. I found Facebook to be bad in the long run. It was also very dangerous for certain personal contacts. I am on the board of my HOA and Anuses started using FB to air their association grievances. I quit Facebook more so for personal reasons.

The removal of statues has gone too far as I said before that this is a symptom of the pendulum swinging too far too fast. What I do not agree with you about is that this is plot to remove White people's history. I find that to be very disingenuous in that look what the Europeans did to the North and South Native American peoples. No I am not blaming Columbuso. The Spaniards for all practical purposes eradicated the history of the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas of South and Central America. In North America we destroyed the Native culture, language, and virtually all of their religions. The Great travel agent and Real Estate Develoer Andrew Jackson got the Indian tribes of Shawnee, Chickasaw, Choktaw, Creek, and Seminole to take a long trip to Oklahoma. Of course he did that legally using the IRA - Indian Removal Act that Congress passed.

No I am not in favor of removing or decapitating Old Hicory's statues but if you want history of both the White and the Red man to be reflected you should attach an addendum to highlight the great history of Jackson the Great Real Estate and Travel Agent at the base of his statues.

So how is removing statues of Cival War traitors destroying the history of the White man? How would changing the names of the Army bases named after Civil War traitors be changing the history of the White man?

How is changing the names of schools named after Jefferson Davis removing the history of the White man ?

What if the story of slavery is removed from our schools, history courses , books, TV shows, movies, and what not so that slavery ceases to be mentioned and ceases to exist in our collective memories is that erasing the history of the White man?

If we erase the story of Custer's Last Stand is ghost erasing the history of the White man?

If we achnkwledge in our schools that archeologists have found evidence that the Vikings ( no not the football team) had settlements for a while in North America before Columbuso is that removing the history of the White man Columbuso?

You mention ISIS well the Spaniards in Central and South America destroyed all forms of documentation, language, culture, statues so are the Spaniards the First ISIS terrorists?

 

Yeah. And?

Because they are a hate group? It’s not about how effective they are now but the fact they exist. They also tend not to be as public about this stuff nowadays.

 

You are referring to the police.

BLM did not form to protest the KKK or the other ever changing names of white supremacist groups that the FBI points out are responsible for the majority of terrorist killings in the USA.

BLM formed because the police and other arms of government see black lives as not mattering. And, they act on that attitude towards blacks on a daily basis - not necessarily by murder, but by a range of disrespect and harm that are experienced in every interaction and grow in seriousness all the way up to murder.

 

I didn't get a lot out of your post, but you described the erasing of history and then asked how does it change our history? Are you kidding? I don't even know if I had any ancestors of any significance that fought in the War of Northern Aggression. What I can tell you is that to look at those who lived, fought and served under the Confederate banner and presume they were one dimensional characters whose lives revolved around slavery is bigotry and racism in and of itself. I'm not so brain dead so as to not realize that slavery was merely an emotional pretext. Back when it started, the south was run by Democrats - the original racists. The south blamed Lincoln for the war due to his unconstitutional acts with the George W. Bush attitude that the Constitution is just a G.D. piece of paper.

My thread is not a debate about that. I'm only asking if there are any organizations out there that are standing up for the Posterity of the founders / framers. From what I am reading into your posts that the answer is NO and anyone that does not go along with the current race war deserves to be killed... which is that I thought in the first place and had to ask the question.

 

I'm sorry. I'm not taking sides, but I've lived within a few miles of where the KKK was rebirthed back in 1926 (IIRC.) For decades, they held public rallies at Stone Mountain. Their leader donated land to build a city park. I once worked for the head honcho guy, clerking in his law office. Hosea Williams, the man who inherited the Martin Luther King, Jr. political empire was one of the KKK guy's clients. They used to sit in a conference room at night arguing race during their Masonic meetings (yep, the head of the KKK and Hosea Williams were both practicing Masons.)

I'm not impressed by labeling organizations "hate groups" as a deflection to asking what, if anything, a group does in support of their race, culture, history, or heritage.

 

Who are you to decide what other white people feel the need for?

Sorry, but declaring that a particular skin tone has no reason to 'group', is ###### as sh!t.