For the first time a considerable number of lawmakers are openly supporting law breakers and marking the law-abiding as the enemy in their attempt to divide the USA with the wedge of their ethno-nationalist tribalism. This is different than previous history and can only end very badly. Virtually everyone is going to have to pick a side and participate.
Every decade becomes a chapter out of 1984. We haven't reached the requisite level of stupidity yet but we're close.
To be frank, that was an assumption and I'm no master of the search function. Can you show me a pro second post?
I suggest law-abiding citizens keep a couple of guns in their home and vehicle. Maybe one on their person. You will soon need one as the criminals are not being arrested and even let out of jail.
So you have no problem with 1984 coming to fruition and our true history being wiped away. Well at least you admit it.
Hope you didn't hurt yourself pulling that crap out of your ass. I didn't say I condone it - I said it happens. Merely a statement of fact. Not approval.
Moronic statement on your part. Hunting is part of the equation - but I have never stated that individuals should not have the right to own firearms. So your statement is false.
You gave no indication of disapproval and want are the BLM and Antifa and Cancel Culture and MSM leftist the victors of?
There are literally thousands of threads and posts on this site that I don't comment on ... does that mean I approve of all of them? WTF. Get real.
Again you think the 2nd Amendment is about hunting this is the second time you have injected hunting into it without mentioning anything else. Where does the 2nd mention hunting?
Same thing the Christians did to Roman and Greek pagan deity statues and temples. Same thing US christians did to Native American Indians..
At the time the Constitution was written, hunting was the primary use of guns. Being able to feed your family was a basic right. I documented crime scenes for 9 years, I know what guns are used for - the good and the bad. I support private ownership - but I have no illusions about their use.
Statues are for national heroes as part of nation building. They're not historical figures, they're the means in which we communicate who is allowed to be part of the nation. Should traitors be allowed into the nation?
And self defense the more important use. You think Lexington and Concord was about hunting? I could care less what you documented were they all hunting accidents or something?
These people are challenging the symbols of the state, quite literally the opposite of the quote you posted here. Try harder please.
Why do you fallaciously call them traitors when the Congress, two President's including the one who headed the Union Army and Supreme Court has said otherwise. What higher standing do you have?
It's secretly because I'm a magical anime girl- Sailor Star Politics! I have the magical ability of not needing votes from them to maintain any political coalition I'm part of. Now your turn. Where did I say I was talking about the CSA?