No, I’m suggesting that those team by law disclose those conversations. Especially ones with foreign leaders of a state that had just inter feared in our elections. It’s getting laughable that you all supported 5 separate investigations into HRC over her description of a motive for the Benghazi attacks, over a 4 year period, but when the Russians interfered in our elections, the FBI should not have even asked any questions ?
Mind boggling... the FBI should ignore a legally questionable topic of conversation between Flynn and a country that Flynn was already under suspicion of colluding with?? To paraphrase Dana Carvey channeling George Bush - Not gonna do it
i have no problem and i’m thrilled that we looked into the russian interference...it’s rather amazing how the clinton campaign and dnc paid a foreign agent to pay for russian misinformation and then the obama admin use that misinformation to spy on americans and lie to judges. with that said that has nothing to do with comey and the obamagate gang using the Logan Act, as a pretext to try and entrap flynn after the fbi found his phone call to be legit
I though the Spygate narrative was spying on a campaign?? What campaign was occurring on Jan 5?? The Jan 5 meeting was how much information to pass to Mike Flynn, where the obvious answer is NONE, since he was making his own foreign policy.
During a January 5th Oval Office meeting, Barack Obama and Joe Biden gave Sally Yates and Susan Rice specific orders to investigate Michael Flynn.
Complete bullshit... But to play your fantasy out, investigate him for what? You do understand the NSA has no investigative powers, do you not?
Bill Barr - FBI acted out of bad faith Bill Barr- "I think there were gross abuses …and inexplicable behavior that is intolerable in the FBI."
A vote for Biden is a vote for a rogue FBI. who wants a rogue FBI that violates Americans rights? Not me. That’s some sort of 1984 stuff right there
Threw him under the Bus. The CYA starting. And she still could not explain what crime started the investigation. And she somehow thinks a duly elected incoming administration is bound to the outgoing administrations policies.
She admitted she would not have signed the warrents now and that Coney was out of control. And the Logan Act faux justification is laughable on it's face as Graham demolished yesterday.
So, you think the Clinton News Network or MSLSD are more reliable news sources? I seem to recall hearing about Vladimir Lenin's "Oh, sh*t" moment when he cemented a doomed socialist state and needed to convince other countries to join in his failure. He enlisted what Ludwig von Mises termed "Useful Idiots" to run the propaganda operation. In today's world that would be the Democratic Party, led by CNN & MSNBC.
And if the left are going to go after that then what they are saying is that the Obama administrations plan was to create a foriegn policy incident in which the Russians would start sanctioning the US and the expulsion of or diplomats and officials. All when they has less than three weeks left in office. They knew what Russia had done twobyears earlier and did nothing and said nothing and then did zoning order to CREATE an international incident to dump on the incoming Trump administration.
Which was then totally destroyed. As was clearly explained Senator Graham himself said he discusses policy matters with foreign officials routinely and incoming administrations are expected to discuss what will be their policies even if they differ from the outgoing. Burning fact Flynn did not even do THAT. He advised the Russian Ambassadore not to escalate and retaliate. Was the Obama policy to get them to escalate and retaliate?
No. The dossier was originally funded by GOP donors to get dirt on Hillary. But NONE of them paid a foreign agent, the company their contracted with did that. That’s a very critical distinction. Along with the fact that the “foreign agent” in question was a US Allie. I love how you righties have a problem with a “foreign agent” when you think its a democrat, but when trump sends Roger stone to actually work with the the foreign agents who hacked the DNC, its “nothing to see here”..... JFC. The NEVER used the Logan act. And you keep dodging the real facts. Based on the information available at the time, they absolutely should have questions Michael Flynn. Denying that is ridiculous. There was no “entrapment”. That’s wasnt even a defense until Trump said it 2 years into his presidency. You supported 4 years of investigations because you didn’t like Hillary claiming the motive was YouTube video, but when a member of the Trump team has a conversation with a representative of a foreign nation that had just interfered in our election, the FBI overstepped their bounds in asking him a question ? FFS
stop with the fake news...the GOP never paid a foreign agent (UK or not doesn’t matter) to create and pass alon gb russian misinformation...the dnc and clinton did. that’s a simple fact. moreover the obama doj used it to get warrants and lied to judges about it. i have no issue with listening to flynn’s call. we see the transcript and the fbi said it was legit. Comey said it was legit and yes Biden did bring up to Logan Act after the fbi said it was a legit call as a pretext to interview flynn...and Yates also said Comey went rogue in getting that interview. a vote for biden is a vote for a rogue fbi
Because they were threatening to destroy his family, the same dirty prosecutor tactics used by Mueller. Why did FBI people say Flynn didn't lie?
Durham has said he disagrees with that notion, bad news for your side. On the Horowitz report, Durham issued a statement saying, "we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened."
Yup. And it appears that though all of them are guilty, they have agreed to throw Comey under the bus. Can Comey drag them under with him?
You keep believing that. So far there's no indication that anyone involved in the investigation did anything illegal. The subjects of the investigation? Yeah. But the investigators? Doesn't look like it.