Why is Harris’s ex’s ex wife opinion relevant? I would understand if it was her mother or immediate family members, tons of coworkers, ex staffers, prior cabinet chairs, her attorneys, ex husbands, past presidents, prior presidential candidates from her own party, business partners or the thousands of people she had defrauded through scam schools and charities. All of those have spoken out about one of the candidates however
The woman you mention is Brown's wife and was Brown's wife, albeit separated, during his affair was Harris. Likely the affair led to the separation and was initiated prior to the separation. Therefore her opinion speaks to the character of Harris. Is this relevant? Well after listening to liberals on this forum comment over and over on Trumps extramarital affairs, I believe it is relevant. Am I wrong? In some ways her (Harris's) character is worse than Trump with respect to morality because she received political appointments as a reward for sex with Brown. Trump paid for sex with his own money whereas Brown was paid for sex with the taxpayers money. See the difference?
You believe a relationship between a woman and a man who is separated is similar to a prostitute and a man who has a child on the way? ... Ok... I don’t really know how to respond to that. And if your qualms are with someone using relationships to get ahead then I will direct you to the entire trump family. I disagree with both candidates so I will not be voting for either of them. Will you? Since you obviously see the issue If you are voting for any of the current R or D field on the basis of “morality”... Again, no words.
A woman who performs sex acts in order to be appointed to a political job is a prostitute. When in doubt as to which candidate to vote for, I always vote based on the candidate who best supports the 2nd Amendment.
Ah, a single issue voter. Always a fascinating bunch. “take the firearms first, and then go to court” — not Harris Who banned bump stocks? She has said she supports red flag laws (like trump), a background check requirement for “anyone who sells more than five guns a year”, a desire to have the ATF to focus more on the firearms aspect of its regulatory and law enforcement mandate. Biden wants more stringent gun safety programs but both stop short of violating the second amendment. Unless you believe that gun ownership is an “absolute right” — meaning it cannot be infringed for any reason. Is that what you believe?
Reality or facts has never stopped much of what we see coming from the rightwing meme factory — don’t know why this would be any different.
I believe I have a right to own a gun. Biden says I don't need an AR-15 and what he calls a high capacity magazine. I disagree. After CHAZ and the like, even sensible liberals now want to own guns. The way Democrats facilitate mob violence, release violent rioters, support defunding the police, etc. they have forfeited the right to lecture people on gun safety.
Really? Ever heard of Russia, vote changing, machines being rigged, Russian mafia, German banks, treason, Putin’s puppet, Russian asset, etc.
What say ye about a man who performs sex acts to become a Husband? What say ye about a woman who performs sex acts to become a Wife?
I believe I have the right to own a nuclear missile. You didn’t answer the question however, do you believe there should be limits on both who can own a gun and what that gun can be? Yes or no?
I say they don't equate in any way to Harris performing sex acts to receive a government job. Now here is my question to you. Is using taxpayer money to pay for sex political corruption?
If there is to be a limit it should be implemented as an exception and not a rule based on a judicial proceeding where the governments proposed ban for an individual can be ruled on by a jury. The ordinary citizen should have access to the same guns used by the bodyguards of gun control advocates like Hillary Clinton or Bloomberg.
The media and democratic leaders incited division immediately after Blake's shooting. They lied many times in their reporting. For example, the media reported, and still are as I speak, that protesters were shot in Kenosha. Anyone with half a brain, and the time to watch all of the videos can clearly see they weren't protesting anything. They were criminal rioters looking to harm and loot. Why does left media continue to spread this lie? To stoke the flames...
The right says it shall not be infringed. A cursory look at state laws show its getting the crap infringed out of it.
That's the new propaganda. The new lie. They want to invalidate the protests, and the protesters. Something that doesn't get discussed much here is how White Supremacists from all over the country are pouring into those protests for the purpose of doing violence and sowing chaos. The wet dream of White Supremacists is always a race war. Republicans have been using them to stoke the flames. This is not new, they've been doing it since the 80s. They'll crank them up until there is a Tim McVeigh (OK City bombing) and then back off for a while. The only chance Republicans have is to amp up the violence as much as they can, and portray it as worse than it is. But this isn't 68. This is Trump's America, and pretending he's an outsider is a joke. He wasn't an outsider in 2016, and he's the ultimate insider now. The public is also different now. Cell phone videos have shown us murder. We've seen a 12 year old kid casually gunned down, we've been made aware of a health care worker killed asleep in her bed. And there is a lot more that doesn't make the news. But it's why millions have protested against the horrible ways they are treated.