Yet ANOTHER SEXUAL ASSAULT allegation against Dirty Donald.

Yet another woman is accusing Dirty Donald of sexually assaulting her back in 1997 when he was still married to his second wife Marla Maples. The woman Amy Dorris, who at the time was an aspiring model in her 20's, claims Dirty Donald invited her and her boyfriend to join him in his private box at the U.S.Open Tennis. She got up and used the private rest room, allocated to Trumps box, when she came out after rinsing her contact lense Trump was outside the door, she thought he was waiting to use the rest room,he instead grabbed her and began sexually assaulting her. Yet another in a very long line of women who have all made very similar charges against an apparent, and from the Billy Bush bus video self confessed, serial sexual predator.

 

Trump hate, like any obsessive bias or hatred, leads people to desperation and the abandonment of their own principles.
Doubly so when they smell money and think they might get a payoff.

It's like verse 9487 of the same old song, and they still think people should listen.

 

How about obsessive love for a politician? To the point that they will immediately jump up and, with no other information, automatically look for some way to defend "the idol". That has to be some sign of desperation and abandonment of your own principles too.

This accusation, like all accusations against any candidate of either political party to any high position in Government, should be taken seriously, investigated and the results made public for everybody to decide if they still support the candidate.

Not off handily dismissed, like this poster does.

 

How? A twenty three year ago she said, he said. It automatically hurts the man. No evidence is actually required.

 

No evidence is no evidence.

 

Her evidence is that she made several others aware of what occurred and with whom at the time immediately after it's occurrence.

 

he molestered me too...i'm waiting for my big check in the mail! I'll buy you guys a round of drinks

 

Sorry but you guys lost all credibility with the whole Brett Kavanaugh thing. Marla Maples times? Pretty sure that was in the 80s. Puh-lease! mean while you got tons of pics and video of Dirty Joe basically giving little girls hickeys that he's so up in their necks.

 

The left keeps hoping and praying that the plural of "accusations" will somehow magically become "proof".

 

How many of those pics are doctored as Dirty Donald's and Steve Scalese's are now bearing the Twiitter caption MANIPULATED MEDIA.

 

it happened so long ago it's hard to say one way or the other.... but based on Trump's own comments and other accusations, it's possible

 

if you want a pay out, you have to go to Trump first, for the 130k nda, going public gets you nothing

 

One might say the same about gullible posters filled with TDS.

 

For Trump supporters it's another feather in his cap...something obviously to be admired...

 

It hurts the woman much much more!

 

This.

the probability of Trump not having committed any of these sexual assaults lessens with each accusation.

 

Only if it is true and that is the question.

 

It is the question. A question you and @spiritgide refuse to ask. That's the point.

To paraphrase his words "obsessive bias or" love of a political pseudo-deity that "leads people to desperation and the abandonment of their own principles."

 

You said it hurts the woman. It would only hurt the woman if it was true. To say it hurts the woman without including that qualification is inaccurate.

 

And a number of Law Enforcement unions have publicly endorsed Trump for President in 2020 while knowing of at least 26 incidents of "unwanted sexual contact" and 43 instances of inappropriate behavior.

I wonder how many persons a new police academy recruit would have to sexually assault before one of those departments would refuse to hire them.

 

I'm not going to debate whether or not this happened but these days such an accusation doesn't even make it through a news cycle and the more the accusations the more the disinterest. Most of these things usually come a day late and a dollar short and if you want to bring up something that allegedly happened twenty three years ago, good luck.

 

Makes absolutely no difference. What I'm talking about is how you and the poster already decided that "The Leader" is and always shall be above all guilt.

Even if her allegations were false, what your attitude implies is unequivocal.

 

#metoo accusations against Biden. Leftist . . . silence . . . utter silence. Kamala said BEFORE Biden offered her a V.P. slot that she believed Biden's accuser. But . . . leftist . . . silence.

 

It makes a very big difference. Virtually anyone can come out of the wood work twenty years later and accuse a person of whatever they want. Generally with the assumption the accusation is valid. That is wrong no matter how you try to frame it. There is a reason for statute of limitations. It does not apply in this case, but the same principle should apply.

 

Yep! Just compartmentalise this as “Trump hatred” that way it can be dismissed without further thought

way to go!