So what motive would someone have for calling a horse gay? Do you think he was merely making an observation that the horse was homosexual or do you think it was intended as an insult. Ps, the prosecution was dropped.
If there was insufficient evidence it was right to drop it. However, homophobic slurs are quite rightly illegal in this country so I have no problem with the student being charged in the first place. There is no such thing as unlimited free speech just as there is no right to unlimited weapons.
Because it's a bloody horse. Now you answer my question. So what motive would someone have for calling a horse gay?
Can you think of any possible motive for using the word gay to describe a horse? I can only think of one.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-10078_aplc.pdf
How does DC v Heller define how "arms" is used in the Constitution? As far as I'm aware, the case simply ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms for self-defense
Passers by. Look, you brought up the incident, the least you could do is read up on what actually happened. The arresting officer thought it could have been offensive to anyone who overheard it.
This sounds like a Monty Python skit. That it's real adds to the hilarity, I suppose comedy in England is now limited to "why did the chicken cross the road..", unless English Vegans take offense.