Trump's attorney cuts through the B.S. and explains their strategy: just give the elections to Trump

Why are you censoring your own sentence?

 

yeah....short and to the point....nice post!

 

Trump comes up with a idea to steal the election, and calls it stop the steal... you can't make this stuff up

 

Inspection of the ballots will sort it out.
Thank the sec of states, courts and election boards for openly defying state election law. They have done you well

 

They either are or they aren't.
If you want to win, you must comply.
Not a difficult subject.

 

Not the court that rules on constitutionality.

Ooops, go find those envelopes !

 

Democrats and their state media have politicized this thing from the get go. As we speak they are going full bore. They only fool the vulnerable and themselves with their conjob.

 

you are right, this thread is not about this. But someone had to go in and say that Trump is responsible for how OTHER people act. In the republican world, each individual is responsible for their OWN actions ( a hard concept for democrats to understand). Anyway, why don't you stop de-railing this thread already? Responding to a thread derailment post is the same thing as doing the de-railing

 

!,) If the only fair election is one where Trump wins, then yeah, unfair world. Tough!

2.) No magic Biden plan. Just good, solid proven science. Been there, done that w/Ebola.

3.) Covid not a gift!!! Trump's handling of covid was the gift.

 

what "SCIENCE" will change under Biden? Are they gonna use different lab equipment? Again, all words form the left but ZERO substance



SAD!

 

Don't want to get in trouble with the mods.

 

They won't get fired because they don't believe in the nonsense that Trump is pushing.

 

The court that rules constitutionality does not demand that voters prove they didn't commit a crime either.

Try to keep up!

 

Since you have called Trump just about every name possible and called his actions crimes using about every word possible, what possible new word would suddenly cause admin to react?

 

Stopping you from derailing is not. Nor is proving that you change the subject because you have no arguments to respond to the OP. Which further proves the point stated there. Which is that Trump's attorneys have only one interest. And it has nothing to do with election integrity. Which is to do away with the system in which the people elect their leaders. Instead seeking to substitute it with a dictatorship. With, what is the worst part of this story, the complacency of his followers.

In Venezuela, it was thanks to the complacency of the Courts that Chavez and Maduro remained in power. This is the model that Trump is following. And his attorneys have admitted it. And you don't care enough to even stay on topic.

 

You made a lot of serious accusations both of Trump and of his followers, none of which you can prove. How is that better than what you accuse Trump of doing?

 

... as oppossed to what....hey drink bleach....or "hey look at me I'm cured what the fuk you pansies worried about!!" I mean seriously your Trump lad was all for calling this a done deal before it even started. I mean the fella has the brains of a sack of batcrap; when it came to organisation or even acknowledging there was problem he wasn't there...didn't have a word of guidance to the American people or the old or suffering. Just sat like a festering turd in his ivory tower and tweeted the usual banalities. Leader....what friggin joke....!!

If the lad hadn't surrounded himself with sycophantic numpties then perhaps he could have made a contribution to the problem rather than being a part of it!!.

 

I'd say we got worked up because a national pandemic is one of a handful of things that truly require leadership. We got worked up because Trump couldn't be bothered to employ the resources of the government to respond in a meaningful way. It was inconvenient for him, so he lied about it.

I've also got to ask if you've seen the Obama playbook that was written specifically in response to Ebola and Zika and given directly to Trump's transition team? It's pretty hard to read it and not be ****ing pissed off.

Here are two links if you're curious:

First Politico Article

"The NSC devised the guide — officially called the Playbook for Early Response to High-Consequence Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and Biological Incidents, but known colloquially as “the pandemic playbook” — across 2016. The project was driven by career civil servants as well as political appointees, aware that global leaders had initially fumbled their response to the 2014-2015 spread of Ebola and wanting to be sure that the next response to an epidemic was better handled."

Playbook for Early Response to High-Consequence Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and Biological Incidents

An example of Decision Cascades from Page 44:

"Is there sufficient PPE for healthcare workers who are providing medical care?"
If YES: What are the triggers to signal exhaustion of national supplies? Are Additional Supplies Available?
If NO: Should the Strategic National Stockpile release PPE to states?

To pretend that Biden doesn't have a plan or that there was no plan and that no one had ever seen anything like it, is just another lie in a blizzard of lies. Please take the time to read a few things in these two links.

 

It would be easier to get away with it with you than it would with a mod.

 

Let me try to figure out if there is some logic buried in there somewhere.

You pick a word so offensive that you believe admin would punish you And therefore you censor your own word. So, whatever, that word is, you do not use it. What you end up with is a sentence which effectively made no sense whatsoever, except possibly, in your own mind. If there is any logic buried in there, I have failed to find it.

 

OP proves it.

I do happen to believe that defending our laws and the Constitution is better than defending a corrupt politician.

 

You accused them of motives. There is nothing in the OP that proves motive.

 

Understood but I'm a First Amendment kinda guy and it sometimes gets my posts edited or removed. Oh well, my principles come first.

 

Being a First Amendment kind guy does not justify slander.