Dominion software manipulated votes -- 289K in Michigan, 96K in Georgia, lawsuits claim

Trubisky playing?

I was rooting big time for them when Foles was starting (I am a die hard Eagles fan)

 

Your understanding of computers and networks and network exploitation is sadly lacking.

 

Didn't Rudy hold a presser at the 4 season ?
Nursery, between a porn shop and a morgue.

 

Geez Louise, I hate having to repeat myself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1112436

 

It seems you don't understand what standing or laches are.

"Standing" is not that "no crime has been committed yet". To have standing the following three things must be true:

1. You can show that an actual injury has occurred - not just to anyone, but to the person/people filing the claim.
2. That the injury can be traced to the person being sued.
3. It's possible for the court to redress the injury with a favorable judgement.

The "doctrine of laches" isn't that "they can't stop the crime anymore". It's that the petitioner waited an unreasonably long time to make their claim, to the detriment of the other party, making it harder to settle the matter equitably,

For instance, waiting until two elections have passed, and the results of the latest one have almost been certified, before complaining about the way elections are run, is unreasonable. And where the delay means the only remedy is to invalidate millions of people's votes that's extremely inequitable, to say the least.

Additionally, cases haven't been thrown out simply because of lack of standing, or laches (in their true senses). They've also been thrown out because they simply fail to make their case, in terms of claiming violations of due process, equal protection, etc. etc. - regardless of dozens of "supporting" affidavits.

Note also that not one of the cases has claimed fraud.

Finally, when you said the courts "can't help you b/c no crime has been committed yet" I sincerely hope you didn't think that they could help when no crime has committed. Because that would be really... odd.

 

Dude - please stop bringing facts and logic to this thread. It does not mix with conspiracy lies - thanks

 

So what happened during the 2020 election is too long ago? Seems a stretch. The court recognized the equal protection issue but dismissed it with this tortured decision.

 

Georgia's already had it's voting machines forensically audited by an independent lab.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/17/geo...dit-found-no-evidence-of-fraud-tampering.html

 

Yeah, well, let bygones be bygones. You can give people the answer to the question and they still get it wrong. LOL

 

Georgia says. The machines lacked audit logs so it would be hard to audit. Georgia will start erasing them Monday.

 

Nobody knew that the Dominion voting machines were that compromised in such a widespread manner until Election Night; that destroys the “doctrine of laches” argument.

Courts are now refusing to hear the case that Republicans had to swiftly put together in 3 weeks’ time as a result of the “doctrine of laches” argument. That destroys your “due process” argument, because there is clearly a lack of due process going on here.

 

You're obviously not tuned into the case details relating to Act 77, passed in Oct 2019. And no, the courts have not recognized equal protections clause or due process claims. They've been dismissed as meritless.

 

Did the Secretary of State of Georgia know that the Dominion voting machines are all connected to the Internet before he made this embarrassing public statement 2 weeks ago? Probably not.

 

The court did recognize it but dismissed it. The damage did not happen until the election. You cannot bring a case until you can prove damage.

 

More imaginative nonsense - really, the world isn't as exciting as you think it is. People go to work, drink their coffee, do some work, have lunch, o home, watch TV. What they're not doing is scrambling about erasing voting machines per your imaginary world. LOL

Georgia - and more particularly, the independent forensic lab - will have all the necessary documentation and details.

 

They already stated they will and why the request to secure the machines.

 

No, they didn't.

If you insist they did recognize it, go ahead and do what you should have done when you first said it - post a link to a judgment saying so.

 

I noticed that too. In one post he claimed the court both recognized it and dismissed it. Funny stuff.

 

Oh please. You know exactly what I mean - that they're not all scrambling about nefariously. Not in real life, only your head.

 

Act 77 is a mere statute, not an amendment.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawand...e-pennsylvania-election-unconstitutional/amp/

 

Who said nefariously? Sounds like a democrat embellishment.

 

Not necessarily because if you can prove the damage is imminent, then you have standing. Republicans didn't care when mail-in ballots were used during the primary, so what changed?

 

If you're running a covert operation, then only people who "need to know" will be informed. It's hardly likely that many public officials (who would naturally get grilled daily by the press) would "need to know" much.

 

I doubt that he even knows what the Internet is. Alaska’s late Senator Ted Stevens accidentally made a decent description of what he clearly knew nothing about when he referred to the Internet as “a series of tubes” years ago.

 

COVID-19 and no other Republicans running for President this year. Or did you forget what a primary is supposed to be?