ONSLAUGHT OF COURT CASES AGAINST TRUMP

I'm not speaking for @Pants but my impression of her question is you don't KNOW what happened between them sexually so it's inappropriate for you to use various nicknames for her role in that relationship. In this vain, it also doesn't matter what I think happened between them because I don't KNOW what happened between them.

 

And like I told her, you can play that little game all day long. People who are being honest in this discussion know that a 29 year old woman doesnt date a 60 year old man because of his intelligence and his outstanding charisma ... ESPECIALLY Willie and just happen to get two political appointments in the process.

 

Good, I just want too see him have to go to court. Be somewhere he doesnt want to be. He is scum

 

You are missing the point or willfully ignoring it. Nobody is refuting that she had a sexual relationship with him. The issue is that she is being debased for it. You don't think your use of "Fellatio Queen" is derogatory? And, you still haven't shown how you KNOW exactly what sex acts they did together.

 

You should apply that same common sense to the bogus voter fraud claims.

 

One liner blah-blah-blah - all of it.

Useless drivel ...

 

Oh, they went off to attack Congress on their own. And they did it directly after he waxed furiously in a meet-up just down the street from the Congress-building?

What planet do you live on? Come down to earth in your commentaries ... !

 

WE, THE SHEEPLE

He is the first PotUS in history to have TWO court-cases waiting for him as a sole-consequence of his presidency.

You (and people-like-you) refuse to understand the complaints made against his presidency ... whilst, we-the-sheeple await patiently for the courts to decide his outcome.

Which will come soon enough ...

 

Nope!

You're bit of simplistic idiocy has been shown well-enough ... !

 

I think you are a pathetically misguided anti-feminist ...

 

Team Humpty Trumpty prove that to be totally correct.

 

There were a lot of first in history for this presidency.
First time a party tried to impeach without a house vote
First time a party went from accusation to an impeachment in 79 days
First time a party was caught falsifying evidence to the Senate. Not once but twice
First time an impeachment was completely partisan
First time a party refused to allow testimony of their star witness (Whistleblower)
First time a party tried to hold depositions with only one party members present
First time a party issued subpoenas without the authority or delegation of the house
First time a party accused a sitting president of colluding with Russians
First time a party refused to serve the senate with impeachment documents for over 30 days after the vote

People like me see the entire story, not just CNNs fake claim side.

Those same sheeple seem to forget that after 55 Forensic FBI agents, two dozen CIA officials, 14 top Democrats lawyers, 2500 witnesses, 17 intelligence agencies, and millions of subpoenaed documents couldn't get their claims to a conviction, they now think a state DA will get the job done.

 

Oh, so you're the one who has this magic phrase or paragraph where Trump tells everyone to riot and attack the capital?
Please, provide us all this magical phrase we have all been asking about now since January but nobody has yet to provide.

 

Yeah, we get that a lot from the left. usually when they can't dispute a claim they always go into the blah blah blah phase.
Most likely because you can't back up your claim with a statement Trump made to start a riot or naming these 5 people who supposedly died during the Capital riots.
if you had the information you would post it. When the left doesn't have the answer its always another blah blah blah claim.
So which one are you?

 

Oh, come-off-it!

You have no broader admit to pertinent-information than anybody else! And if you did, you'd not be in this forum but writing a book to make-a-megabuck! (America's New-Dream landmark!)

Because the documents (Donald-Dork's Tax Returns) were prohibited-by-law from public-divulging. From which they are now no longer protected. (Had they come out in the first-place, he'd likely not have been elected!)

It's a whole new ball-game with him no longer in the Oval Office. And, frankly, who gives a damn what happens to him - except himself?

And let's not forget: He did not expect to win the Replicant-nomination at first. He did it to bounce-a-book he'd written. It was only when he saw the other Replicant-jerks who signed-up that he thought he might have a chance to win the nomination.

He then lost the popular-vote election, but the All-screwed-up Electoral College handed him the presidency on a pillow.

Aint no way to run a country ... !

 

Selling your body to move ones way up doesn’t make one a feminist. It makes one a whore. I think your definitions are mixed up.

 

And who are you to judge of what selling-a-body consists and its price?

You give church-lessons on Good Christian Behavior as well ... ?

 

There was no single magical phrase. There was 3 plus months of daily telling them "they alone can save the nation" and telling them the election had been stolen and only they can fix it. And 3 months of calling Pence and those in congress traitors and cowards for not handing him the election along with his own legal team saying Mike Pence needed to be taken out and hung. Do you think it was just coincidence they built gallows outside of the Capital or that they were chanting for the death of Pence? Speaking of gallows, why did they just happen to have lumber and ropes with them for a peaceful gathering?

 

Trading sex for favors is the EPITOME of the definition of prostitution.

 

Have you noticed he has no problem at all with the male that receives the sex for favors, just with the woman that is supposedly doing it.

 

A rant that's really gotten under your skin I see.

 

I'm more curious to know what Trump's civil litigations have to do with anything. While you're braing about wild rants, you're devoting a lot of time virtue signalling on a thread that's purely an anti Trump rant.

 

Your vision is clouded. Nothing gets under my skin. Not even my ex.

 

LOL ... What's to debate exactly? Trump's being sued? So what? "Current" or not ... "Event"? Hardly, lawsuits are common.

 

You're pathetic.

You go on Ignore ...