OK, if you have sex with a dude, even though dude claims to be a chick (and you are a male) did you engage in heterosexual activity?
Interesting question. Cannot say I really thought about it before. I think that would depend on the dude claiming to be a chick. If the dude does not look like a dude and does not have a dick, then I would think so. Take this person for example. Would you know this person was a dude as you put it?
It was my understanding they have the dick removed. But I will conceded to your vast experience in this area and move on
Thats the old, 20th century concept of transgenderism. Now, simply identifying as the opposite sex is all that is required.
Exactly. Imagine if Exactly. It is like calling the village idiot a genius because you don't want to hurt their feelings.
Just googled MMA, transgender rules and it looks like you can keep the dick, but the nads need to be removed. And this fighter went to Thailand for surgery, but didnt see any details as to what he had done.
When it comes to competitions like this, the difference between male and female play a huge role because of the biological differences in strength and the ability to gain muscle. A man's body is far stronger and has the ability to gain muscle much faster than a female, which is why trans should no be allowed to compete. For the ones here to want to pretend this is a woman, all you are doing is supporting men beating the crap out of women and you seem proud of it. You are ignoring the science behind male and female to virtue signal on something you obviously know nothing about. I don't care if he has pink hair and gives himself a girl name, his dna and every cell in his body is a man which gives him a great advantage over her.
Or perhaps they have a paraphilia which gives them a certain frission when they think of their bodies as female.
All that education you have and yet you don't know the differences between male and female bodies. Regardless of what you've been told by your progressive friends, male and female bodies are very different. In this type of sport/competition, strength plays a huge role and he had a drastic advantage because he is a natural born male.
This is a bit disingenuous. I am making no determination if the person is man or a woman, but the fight was an organized event sanctioned by the governing body of the sport and agreed to by both fighters. This is not some random dude beating the **** out of women.
So since the MMA group allowed it, it's fine that a man beat the crap out of a woman? I don't care if they both agreed to it. It's wrong and it's sending the wrong message to the other fighters. I wouldn't have accepted the fight and the other real women fighters need to do the same. And no one needs you to determine if it's a man or not, facts do and it's most definitely a male.
Well, yeah, if two consenting adults agree to something that is not illegal I am not going to tell them they are wrong, and depending on what it is I might not even if it is illegal. But I am not into controlling what others do. If the other fighters agree with you, then they will refuse to fight this person. They are all grown adults, allowed to make their own choices.
It's setting a bad precedent for women's sports. These women may feel that they have to accept the fight to remain relevant, or they have been taught incorrectly by their progressive friends that the only difference between male & female is it's genitalia, then they learn the hard way when they are getting beat silly in the octagon. I'd bet against the latter though, these people train hard and tend to learn the science of strength training and diet.
The fighter that lost is 0-4 in her career, I do not think she has ever been relevant. I will leave it up to the sport and the women in it to make the choice, I have no skin in the game.
Exactly. I have made that Exact Same Point (Several Times)... They would get destroyed by any GOOD MMA Women's Fighter.
The fact that is even a discussion tells you all you need to know about the Modern West. No wonder kids today are so screwed up. Interestingly any 5th grader would say that is a dude. Leftist education makes you dumb. But that's a goal of theirs...
The presence of a vagina is what makes a female a female I don't know if there's any way to put it any simpler than that. Are we going to start wondering next if night time is actually really daytime after all?