Rittenhouse Judge receives ‘thousands’ of vile messages and death threats - LIB MEDIA ARE SILENT!

Does anyone for a second believe that it wouldn't be a national news story spearheaded by the dominant liberal media, if the defendant was a black BLM supporter, and a bunch of right wingers sent death threats to the judge? I think we all know that it would be!

 

This is a cultural issue. Most decent people believe that it is wrong to provoke somebody to a murderous rage and then kill them in "self-defense" when they fight back but quite a few of our gun advocates do not. If Rittenhouse gets off we are in a different culture than we were before and not a sustainable one IMO

Death threats to anyone are always wrong and wrongheaded. You are becoming worse than what you are fighting

 

Seriously? You're already taking this discussion off-topic in the second post?
What exactly did he do to provoke them into a murderous rage?

Was it a Trump hat?

 

I don't think I want to live in the culture that you live in.

Well anyway, like Lincoln said, "A house divided against itself cannot stand... It will become all one thing, or all the other"

 

Like what's new??? We have the whole day left for it to degenerate into "But, but, but...TRUMP!". As to the topic it's the curse of the internet age, you likely could get death threats for posting you prefer grilled cheese on rye...anonymity breeds a**holes.

 

He dared to out a fire.

Oh wait...he should have even been there!

He shouldn't have had a gun and been there!

So if he loses, the the people are being told they are;

Not allowed to out out fires

Not allowed to protect property by being there to protect property

Not allowed to be armed or defend themselves.

 

Because he defended himself?

So why do you think that it's being ignored?

 

What the hell does this have to do with the judge?

 

He definitely shouldn't have been there with a gun. No child should. However, this obviously has nothing to do with the case. He's obviously innocent.

 

Sheesh. Cathy Newman was treated better when she claimed threats after Jordan Peterson whooped her butt. "So you're saying..."

 

Rittenhouse didn't provoke anybody. He was just standing there when the pedophile screamed at him that he would kill him. Rittenhouse hadn't said a word. The the pedophile attacked rittenhouse. Rittenhouse only dfended himself. Gees... look ate the VIDEO!

 

Being 1 month away from being allowed to fight in wars. I think we need MORE Rittenhouse's that can and will protect those who need to be protected from those who need to be protected.

 

Gee, I wonder why the left jumped to HER defense!

 

Except that the evidence shows that those where shot were the provokers.

 

You got kids?

 

I do.

And if I had to choose if I want my son to be a Rosembaum or a Rittenhouse. I'll pick Rittenhouse every single time.

 

Yeah, but if your child asked you if he can enter go inyo a literal war zone with a visible assault rifle to protect property from thug animals who are hell bent on destroying it, would you be cool with that?

 

You can enlist at 17, with parental ok.

 

Probably not. But then I wouldn't be ok with my son going off to fight in a war either. That being said, for those that do choose to put themselves in harms way in defense of others, I salute your bravery.

We need MORE people like Rittenhouse. Not less. Otherwise the mob wins and we live in chaos. Because after 2 days of unchecked riots and destruction and damage, it was very clear that the police couldn't or wouldn't protect the people. And certainly the government could care less.

So that then leaves the people to protect themselves. Because submitting to the will of the mob is not an option.

 

How was he provoked? Witness testimony says he threatened Kyle Rittenhouse that he was going to kill him if he catches him by himself. I believe Kyle was targeted based on that testimony.

 

I think he is trying to equate the people that are giving threats to a judge as “decent people”

 

Not able to stand up to scrutiny! How typical of you!

 

Well the difference is he wouldn't need your permission.

Yeah but ideally they are adults, not kids. Ideally, fully developed, or close to full developed 20-25 year old men, at the very youngest.

 

Nothing...it is a feeble attempt to deflect.

 

Rittenhouse didn't provoke anyone. That's simply not true.