I would argue that the choice to travel or not precludes the 'prison' analogy more than anything else. Don't want to spend 14 days in quarantine? Delay your trip. Easy. That aside All incoming travelers have 14 days of quarantine. That length of time is under review. Travelers from certain countries (based on vaccination levels in the country concerned) may soon have less or even no quarantine period. Once vaccination levels are more or less even across the country (above 80%-90%) which is expected to be soon quarantine requirements will be reduced for all incoming passengers. (E.g, something like you must be fully vaccinated and have a negative COVID test 48 hours before flying then another one upon arrival, possibly two 48 hours apart) and away you go after say a 3 day quarantine period.) It all depends on how well the country your from is handling the disease. Regardless every Government and political party in the country wants it to end asap but they're being guided by medical advice as to how soon that will happen.
You're not telling me anything new. You keep turning me into the subject, while it's not about me. The defense team was questionable at best? HUH??? The prosecutors were questionable at best, and that leaves open how things could have been going if there were reasonable adequate. You keep turning me into the subject, while it's not about me.
You're pushing the goalpost. The point was made that Biden rolled over and played dead for the Taliban for leaving Afghanistan, while the fact is that Donald was the architect of that roll over and playing dead for the Taliban.. since he signed that Doha deal. Period. So it's obvious you lot have been barking up the wrong tree. It's embarrassing.
You say that while Rittenhouse had an expert flown in to pick the jury, among things. If it was such a sure case, then such a thing would obviously not be needed. His experts thought differently. So I'm with them and not with your flimsy opinion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_discrimination_in_jury_selection This happens for a reason. I'm not interested in your alleged person experiences when I know real cases that went very differently. It's not moving the goal post. I'm showing the fast difference between the approach of the defense vs the prosecution vs other prosecutors. And other prosecutors could have asked questions whose answers weren't totally supportive for the case of the defense, but supportive to get Kyle prosecuted. Haven't you paid attention what went on in the trial?
them getting an expert at Jury selection has nothing to do with how strong the case is.. its to make sure someone like you does not end up on the Jury.. Someone who has no clue about the law or doesn't care about the law and will judge based on political ideology rather then the law and the facts of the case. Jury selection and strong defensive evidence are 2 separate issues and its no surprise that you dont understand how it works
Somebody suggested that Biden was rolling over playing dead for the Taliban, while it was Trump's plan to do exactly that. Hence it remains just jaw dropping to mock Biden for what Trump was planning to do as well.... without mocking Trump.
Sure it has. His lawyers could have done it themselves, but they did not... out of fear that they might lose the case if they didn't get this part right. You're totally lame personal attacks are boring me.
Funny how Kyle is called a vigilante but not the 3 who attempted to kill him, yet the survivor claims was attempting to stop him because he thought he was an active shooter...that just happened to be running away lol. Thats the left for you, not all but most, supporting the criminal over the victim. WAY TO GO KYLE! Kyle walks a hero.
The defense was bad and there were a lot they could have done for a better jury but even with the choices they allowed the jury still came to the conclusion lawyers watching the trial thought was the correct verdict.
They asked suggestive questions to the witnesses whose response was totally helping out the defense team. A reasonable person would think this is going to help out a jury who got handpicked by experts with the idea that these people on the jury will be most likely to find Rittenhouse innocent. And you can not honestly mean that when we would redo this trial with people on the jury who most likely support BLM as a hobby and just stick to only questions whose answers will get an incriminating answer for Rittenhouse, that the result will remain the same. That's just nuts and so you can end that horseplay.
It's not a personal attack it's an observation based on how you have replied in all of the Rittenhouse threads.. you do not understand the law or just don't care about the law.. you are the type of person that gets weeded out during jury selection.. If you where on the jury would you of found him guilty or not?
Biden snuck away from an airport in the dead of night. Biden was in charge when insufficient forces faced the Taliban. If you think anyone would PLAN on such negligence is insane. Your hate of Trump makes you nuts.
What different evidence would they have had? You made a statement that unless it takes weeks to seat a jury then they jury's decision must be dismissed as questionable and racist. Utter nonsense. Then let's deal with this one. What different evidence would they have had? What different evidence would they have had? What different questions would they have asked? Did YOU pay attention?
oh look here you are stating that you can never open carry in public in the state of Florida.... When the Florida state statute specifically says that it is permitted when going to or coming from the listed shooting activities or hunting or fishing camping hiking. Now what were you just claiming in the other thread?
Correct. Florida has one of the strictest open carry laws in the nation. Oh, look, I was right. Correct. I have pointed this out to you 6 times, but for whatever reason you cannot comprehend it, - or more likely cannot admit that you made a mistake. Same thing that I explained here 4 times I also explained there 2 times. Florida laws prohibit open carry except in target shooting, hunting related activities. Very strict, - or to quote some other people here: "MARXIST". You should stop talking, because you come across as a butthurt loser
again with your little insults why am I not surprised? If I type the words bigger or slower will it help? The Florida statute says open carry is legal for those activities we've already spoke of....... Now here's the really important part are you ready? The statute specifically says when going to and coming from such activities.... Now most people would understand this means at some point you would be in public in your travels. But like I said that would be most people, it takes some common sense to understand the finer nuance of that.... Going to and coming from... Think about it for a minute.
I'm just happy that here in Texas, open carry and concealed carry are the rule for every legal gun owner, without permit or registration. There are a few places you cannot carry, like hospitals and schools, but everywhere you WANT to carry is fine.
And someone disagreed with this? "I said target shooting, hunting etc related activities are exceptions" I said it 7 times now. You are bickering and arguing for the sake of arguing because you set up a wager, which you immediately lost.
Rep. Matt Gaetz @RepMattGaetz BREAKING: I will be introducing a National Stand Your Ground Law following Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial. You have the right to defend your life from an attacker. Abolish the legal duty of retreat everywhere. I’ve had enough retreat. No more.