Replacement 'theory'

Your destroy your own credibility when you use words like "importing illegals".

 

I didn't expect an answer. There is no credible one.

 

Clearly you do not know what the Great Replacement Theory" actually is!

 

Its a fake claim, so its like trying to answer someone claiming the earth is a square. Waste of time. Like I said, you ruin your own credibility.

 

As I said, I didn't expect an answer. You can stop wasting your time and mine at this point.

 

Its weird they claim they don't know what it means and yet its all they ever talk about.

 

uninvited, entitled invaders who some people want to vote, ffs.

 

What could go wrong with letting people who's country is so shitty that people are packing themselves into trailers and illegally invading this country, make decisions on how a place should be run? I mean, they've done such an awesome job I can see why dems want the here to turn this place into the dung heap that is mexico. how sad, they'd sacrifice the lives of other Americans for votes.

 

The exact same thing is true of Rachel Maddow. The difference is that her terrorist actually listened to her show and was a huge fan. There's no evidence that the Buffalo shooter was a Tucker Carlson fan.

 

There's only 200 of them?

 

During the time it took me to create the post my estimate is 200 snuck over. I'm certain we're WAY over that number now!

 

That's certainly possible. But he is a fan of the kind of bigotry Carlson spews.

 

It's exhausting trying to keep up with all the garbage in their heads. And frustrating when they repeat it after it's been debunked.

 

That's why it falls on the side of 'dishonest'. They know its bunk, but keep repeating it anyway.

 

It's not just "possible". It's a fact. Unfortunately (at least for all those that want to pin the Buffalo terrorist attack on Tucker Carlson) the reality (at least from all the information we have available) is that the shooter was not a fan / viewer of Tucker Carlson.

 

Sort of like those trying to blame Tucker Carlson for the Buffalo shooting?

 

Touche.

 

Does anyone have the official stats on the number of immigrants to the US who successfully become citizens and there for allowed to vote?
My own experience of living in the UK tells me that immigrants usually vote towards the conservative end of the spectrum. They don't like change and come from even more conservative backgrounds. They like authority, regimentation, old fashioned positions and fear anything that may bring change to what they are familiar with.
The GRT is one of those conspiracy theories that reflect racist attitudes, and is usually held by the right or far right. I am not are of any left leaning commentary that supports such a theory and the right uses it to accuse the left of some unified conspiracy formulated by the left. It is anti immigrant, racist, targets certain faiths and targets women who are accused of conspiring to have as many children as possible to swamp the current population.
It really is disgraceful.

 

They don't need to wait for amnesty to vote. When you register, your citizenship status is established with nothing more than a utility bill with your name on it. No passport, birth certificate, certificate of naturalization, or whatever else is required, nor will it be checked. You just have to answer the question of are you a citizen by saying (or it would be more accurate to say writing on the form) yes.

Boom, you're a registered voter.

 

No one knows how many vote while not being citizens as the US voting laws are atrocious. The majority of people that come over want their own culture while being in a different land which is obvious but, they want all of the welfare that comes along with them merely existing in this new country. Whether it's legal or illegally.

Calling out the obvious is disgraceful now? Calling things racist or whatever as a rebuttal is so early 2000s. Why don't you back it up with facts that disprove it entirely?

 

Actually Tucker DID say "Great Replacement". My real point was that the argument "So and so never said the words [insert the name of the crime or immoral action here], therefore, so and so is not guilty of [insert the name of the crime or immoral action here]" is idiotic. And deserves no attention or comment. Only deserves to be made fun of (like I did)

It's a general rule that you can apply EVERY time you feel the need to use this absurd argument.

 

Another CNN regurgitation from the left. Its so easy to spot. The only reference to replacement has been replacing voters with illegal votes.
Had anyone actually heard anything about replacement from any news crew, instead of CNN fake news, they wouldn't be comparing the two.

 

Wasn't there more like 200 thousand of them BEFORE you posted?

 

We're in the millions now.

 

What about voter ID?