No, the part that I found very compelling was the several statistical analyses done by a few different mathematicians/statisticians. I am not a mathematician, but I do understand their points. The distribution of votes was not a typical distribution. The preponderance of the evidence works against the claims that the 2020 election was the most secure evidence. The preponderance of the evidence shows voter fraud was present. For example, the State of North Carolina had to remove 400,000 invalid names from its voter rolls. The only reason it did that was because Judicial Watch filed suit against the state. Why must a voluntary group of citizens go to court to force a state to do what the law demands? True the Vote's work in 2000 Mules is another example of concerned citizens paying their own money to examine what the government should be examining on its own. Bad news: Government today in these United States are corrupt as hell.
And this always eventually finds itself trickling down to the local level. Case in point: Asset forfeiture laws (to prevent drug king pins from hiring effective counsel), is now used to shake down Grannie who pays her rent in cash. The J6 show trial is all prosecution, no defense. Heading to a city near you!
them removing invalid names from their voter rolls would be relevant if any of those voters voted You haven’t but even bothered to take a look at my source have you. It discusses just about everything you are taking issue with
So how many cops did the Colbert crew beat? How many elections did they try to overthrow? How many skulls did they fracture? How many times did they taze a cop into cardiac arrest? How many times did they chant for the murder of their political enemies? Just another attempt by this squeaky **** to downplay something that ANYONE who cares about our country should care about.
That was a liberal Court that ruled on the Bush/Gore issue. The EC always rules, we don't have a popular vote for President and the only Russian connection was to the Hillary Campaign.
Why would it not be relevant? It was a liberal court and you are obviously a liberal so they was your people and they got it right. False in what way?
I am not in a cult — I do not have “people” Not being a right wing extremist does not make me a liberal The majority of the liberals on the court at that time dissented so I’m not really sure how you came to that conclusion it has been proven numerous times that Russia organized events by both BLM and conservative events so they would clash. They also ran misinformation
nope, not possible!!! Democrat activists even though known to be rioters and do things like kill cops, steal, and set building on fire, are never guilty. nope. yay two tier justice system! Let's Go Brandon and the Democrat Politicians putting people in the FBI and CIA to help them overthrow the law!
What do you expect? These are the same people that cheered "autonomous zones" and burned down cities for 4 years.
I mentioned BLM because their actions were clearly insurrectional. But they got a pass. Tucker was not fired. His show was canceled. He continued to receive pay checks from Fox News. He might still be receiving them.
Many of the Floyd riots were started by right-wing white supremacists like 'Umbrella man' that busted up AutoZone and Boogaloo Boi that shot up MN police station. The other opportunistic thugs that did riot had no interests in politics, likely didn't vote, or not even old enough to vote. They certainly weren't attempting to overthrow the government and discard our Constitutional processes. More importantly, they did NOT get a pass as they were condemned by both parties, unlike the J6 insurrectionists who are still defended by most Republicans today.
Source?? Kamala Harris started a fund to bail out the BLM thugs who went on to commit serious crimes injuring innocent citizens. — Amateur Hour: Kamala Harris in the White House by Charlie Spiering https://a.co/emQPH6h