Eric Trump reveals HE told Donald FBI raided Mar-a-Lago: Ex-President's son claims agents 'ransacked

You really need to do some research.

*LOL*

 

Is that why you are showing us the documents?

 

And I provided the SCOTUS ruling that states the president has the ability AT WILL to declassify.
You going to claim the SCOTUS can't do that now or that they were all lying too?

 

Does Garland say when a copy of the warrant was given to Trump's lawyers?

 

Trump lawyer says she's told him all litigation involving the former president 'will stop' if he announces he's not running for office in 2024
Katie Balevic
Sat, August 13, 2022 at 2:28 PM

• A Trump lawyer said investigations into the former president would stop if he didn't run for office in 2024.
  
  
• The Department of Justice executed an FBI raid of Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, seeking classified documents.
  
  
• Attorney Alina Habba said the raid would increase support among Trump's base.
  

... https://news.yahoo.com/trump-lawyer-says-shes-told-192804167.html​

These (R)adicals do propaganda better than the Putler regime. They are working so hard to establish this witch hunt narrative in hopes that it energizes (R)adical voters.

 

And the president has the authority to classify also. Which is my point. If Buden decided to reclassify those documents, he's got every right, but you seem to think his authority is limited.

 

FBI agents, Garland and Wray see increased death threats after Trump Mar-a-Lago raid: sources | Fox News

Claimed the president can declassify

"at will" "without any process" LOL

 

Too late. This started blowing up in Democrats faces the day they did it.
I am wondering how all these leftist post are going to blow up in their faces when they find out the SCOTUS ruled that the president has the ability AT WILL to declassify.

 

I laugh at Condors posts too. They are comedy gold.

 

I did see something about a copy. Giving a copy of the warrant to Trump's lawyers immediately and a list of the items removed after the search would be fine.
Withholding a copy of the warrant as the search was carried out is a mistake.
Not allowing Trump's lawyers observe or video the search as it was carried out is another mistake.

 

Not against any agents at Mar a lago, which was your claim as to why they were redacted.
Try again

False.
I provided the SCOTUS ruling that states the president has the ability AT WILL to declassify.
Still flailing around on the deck are ya.
It must be tough to be a Democrat these days. We get it.
Too funny

 

It did? It sure looks the Orange Colon **** the bed again. His lies are painfully debunked, and he'll finally face consequences for his criminal conduct and taking a dump on the rule of law. The end.

 

Per this timeline, yes

SNIP
During the meeting, the federal officials serve a grand jury subpoena for some of the sensitive national security documents on the premises, and they take away the subpoenaed documents.
ENDSNIP

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/politics/doj-investigation-trump-documents-timeline/index.html

 

The warrant given to Trump's lawyers was a generic version. The DOJ had to file a motion with the court to unseal the full warrant at which point the Trump team could see it.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-mara-a-lago-fbi-search-lawyer/#app

 

Hmmm. Well, I provided you with the SCOTUS ruling on president declassifying their own documents
Still waiting on a ruling that allows a president to re-classify a former presidents documents or any claim Biden did that.
Still waiting

 

Trump's NJ lawyer who got his attention on Fox news or something like that, how so many get into his web.
Musta been her who told the FBI there were no more classified documents and she thinks she'll be off the hook too if Trump doesn't run in 2024?

Garland said no to that when he addressed the nation recently.

 

God. His/her posts are more hysterical because you can tell he/she firmly believes the dumb ass **** he/she is posting! LMAO

 

Did you just try to implement "logic" with a MAGA??

However, here's another scary possibility.... what if he has some way of acquiring top secret documents even today???

 

Last we all checked, leftist thousands of fake criminal claims over 6 years without a single indictment shows the left has **** the bed and painfully debunked.
You should keep up with your own current batting average of 0/20,000.
But you keep running up that hill when the left commands you to respond to the wolf.
I have to say, its getting more and more entertaining watching these Democrat Manchurian candidates.

 

Garland said that? You have a link for that or a video, right?

 

Again, the court case says a president has broad authority to classify documents. I can't find any reason why the constitution would allow a former president more power than the current one.

 

Don't ever give me fox news as a source and expect me not to laugh.
They have been confusing real and fantasy for years.

 

Police who are afraid of cameras and recorders are obviously up to no good.

Every aspect of the execution of a search warrant by police in a citizens home should be recorded to protect the 4th amendment rights of the target.

“Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes police and other government officials carrying out their duties.
However, there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs or video in public places and harassing, detaining, and arresting those who fail to comply.
The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records.
The ACLU has fought—and will keep fighting—to ensure that the right to film and photograph the police is respected by law enforcement officials.”
ACLU, Filming and Photographing the Police
https://www.aclu.org/issues/free-speech/photographers-rights/filming-and-photographing-police

 

Still waiting on a ruling that allows a president to re-classify a former presidents documents or any claim Biden did that.