The Mehmet Oz Senate Campaign is being colossally stupid about allowing itself to be drawn into a debate over John Fetterman's health as it relates to harm from his stroke suffered in the summer. This is all a distraction from where the focus of the Senate campaign should be which is primarily the malfeasance of the Democrat Party over their stewardship of the economy, America is seeing painfully high interest rates which will get worse because of high inflation brought on by Democrats obstruction of fossil fuel production in the U.S. and excessive Federal Government spending! The media which is pro-Democrat will love to talk about John Fetterman's health and not Democrat failed policies through this November election and the Oz campaign should stop playing their game. The Oz campaign should stop the criticism of Fetterman over his vague promise for only one debate in middle or late October and stop attacking him about hiding the full scope of his health problems and the meaning of his known health problems. Yes, Mehmet Oz's position should be that there should be two to three debates to address all the relevant issues and they should occur early enough so mail-in-ballot voters can have the debate performances to factor in on their decision on who is the best candidate for the job of Senator for Pennsylvania and Mehmet Oz should hold as his position that John Fetterman's public behavior post his stroke indicates he has a problem with comprehension and communication which are a drawback in the area of qualifications for the job of U.S. Senator which requires good advocacy skills. Mehmet Oz should only provide these positions when asked by the media it shouldn't be a campaign focus. In fact, Mehmet Oz and his allies should stop advertising on this issue! The Oz's campaign focusing on this Fetterman health issue is unwise on many fronts besides distracting from important policy issues. Fetterman's stroke related health issues don't relate to judgment issues on Fetterman's part. Pennsylvanians have a history of voting for candidates that have terrible communication skills. Senate Bob Casey early in his Senate career had terrible oratory skills, he had no political skills in that area, Senator Casey was monotone in his speech and he spoke in a low volume; nevertheless Pennsylvanians elected him to the Senate three times. Further, it is really risky on the Oz's campaign's part banking on Fetterman's health problems to give him the winning margin come November 8 because stroke victims often have a recovery period embodying one year's time and Fetterman is a competitive guy he could very well work himself into a condition by the end of October where he largely overcomes his communication problems and at that debate if Fetterman performs well Fetterman could get a voter support boost from this debate which could result in him edging out Oz in this almost certainly going to be a close Senate race. Also, the Oz's campaign attacking Fetterman on this issue hurts the Mehmet Oz brand; the Mehmet Oz brand is the friendly Doctor talk show host that is a nice guy and is about helping people he isn't a cut throat competitor that takes advantage of a health problem the other person cannot help. Mehmet Oz and many other questionably strong Republican Senate candidates in the mid-terms can win their races if they stick with the issues! Because the Democrats and their minion candidates are a disaster, an alarming heart-breaking disaster for America based on the policy issues facing America!
The one thing Oz and Trump have in common is that neither one was political savvy. The Democrats would lay a trap for Trump and he would walk right into it whereas a more political experienced and savvy politician wouldn’t have. Oz is repeating this fall into a laid trap bigtime. Fetterman is looking very good in PA and will win in my opinion. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...pennsylvania_senate_oz_vs_fetterman-7695.html
Political traps are set for honest people who try to get into politics. It’s the most crooked game in town! They could do worse than Oz.
Ad about that time Fetterman pulled a shotgun on a black jogger 'Large white man saw a black man running. He chased the man with his shotgun, and held him until police arrived.' 'Fetterman also wants to empty Pennsylvania’s prisons by a third by turning the felons out onto the streets. There is even an Inmates for Fetterman coalition.' The Fetterman plan: 'release of one-third of Pennsylvania’s inmate population, defunding the police, decriminalizing drugs like heroin and fentanyl, and lesser sentences for murder convictions” Doesn't sound right for PA
Oz is a demented quack https://journalofethics.ama-assn.or...oes-professional-self-regulation-work/2017-02 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167233/ Typical Trump endorsee.
This is where campaign and political experience come into play. I don't know who is the political advisor for Oz or whether Oz will listen to him. One needs to select a very political astute political statisgest and advisor and listen to him. Especially someone like Oz who has zero campaign and or political experience.
What the hell's up with Fetterman's neck? Fetterman’s 9/11 Abortion Rally Is His Most Disturbing Performance Yet. “You really have to press play on the clip and watch it to understand just how bad it is because it is that bad. This is not a man who is well enough to be a US Senator, and there are no signs that he’s getting any better. In fact, I would suggest that he’s in worse condition now than he was a month ago.” 'I would try to transcribe what’s in that video, but it’s not really possible. It’s that unintelligible. Ostensibly, he’s trying to take some shots at Sen. Pat Toomey, but it just goes way off the rails. His word usage is all over the place, he has weird inflections, and his sentence structure makes no sense at all. At one point, he pauses for an uncomfortably long period of time, just staring, seeming to have completely forgotten what he was talking about. Fetterman then comes back and says “He, Pat Toomey is a miracle.” I can’t make heads or tails of it what the point was.' Very painful to watch.
He's not trying to just release 1/3. He's pointing out you can release non violent offenders, which make up about a third, and since they're non violent offenders no violent crime implications exist.
This guy looks like that guy from "The Hills Have Eyes" and he's running against Doc Oz. PA must be a crazy place
Non-violent offenders get Life Without Parole? Are you sure? John Fetterman @JohnFetterman US Senate candidate, PA -> In 1976, 650 people were serving life without the possibility of parole in PA. By 2018, more than 5,400 were serving life without parole. (LWOP) -> 2/3 of LWOP are Black. -> We could reduce our state prison population by 1/3, make us *no* less safe + save $1B a year.
https://law.stanford.edu/three-strikes-project/three-strikes-basics/ Learn something. What does their race have to do with anything?
Beats me, ask semi-racist Fetterman, he's the one that made this observation. I was responding to the claim that the 1/3 of felons he wants to turn loose on the streets of Pennsylvania are only 'non-violent'. Well, exactly how many of the 'non-violent' are serving sentences of life without possibility of parole?
https://law.stanford.edu/three-strikes-project/three-strikes-basics/ ^ Again: Perhaps you should discover that for yourself. WTF is this shitty meme about exactly?