I may have to stand corrected on this one pewter does have a low melting point. I was thinking of pewter alloy. You could melt the pewter on your stove top. Maybe they are made out of that
It amazes me that people think the second amendment is for hunting. Or that hunting is the only purpose to lawfully own or use a firearm
That doesn't make it OK for you to violate those rights. I can argue that you can't violate people's rights. And actually, I could argue that the Federal government can't regulate guns if I wanted to bother typing out the argument. Sure they do. Your unconstitutional proposal will not do anything to limit the damage caused in a mass murder.
No it can't. Yes it is. It won't fix anything ever. All it will do is violate people's civil liberties. You hit a nerve because people are sick of progressives trying to violate people's civil liberties. Nothing about your unconstitutional proposal would be effective.
I would disagree. “Ammo” as “ammo” yes is harmless but that is not its function and few have stockpiles that have no purpose. People usually stockpile for a purpose and the end purpose usually is?
There is not. I have no idea. Some people shoot for sport. Some for defense. Others hunt game animals.
And some take what is too readily available and use it to harm others Australia has had 4 mass shootings since 1996
There is no such thing as too readily available. We're free people. Guns are supposed to be readily available. OK.
It is one of those false choices the gun banners dream up. It's akin to saying your right to have a penis violates a girl's right to her virginity. It is so absolutely stupid that only the most benighted banners believe it
who cares, this is the USA. Why are you so obsessed with our freedoms? the Aesop fox syndrome seems present in your silly arguments