What I wonder: Are there any news about Lady Susan Hussey? It seems Ngozi Fulani is all over the place. While Lady Susan Hussey has become some sort of non-person. A speaker for her godson Prince William calls her: "that individual". Is that a way how a godson refers to his godmother?
There is a report on Sistah Space. I will now just copy the begining: Here you can read more: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1601735411860406274.html
Another article I find well worth reading: https://spectator.com.au/2022/12/loyal-not-the-new-woke-royals/
The Spectator article is an opinion piece, not a factual one. The opinion is both wrong and badly written. Nobody gave the aristocrat a script, she decided what to say and do.
An analogy: Let's say I had Scottish ancestors and now go to some party dressed up in a fake Scottish kilt and a name badge that says: "Hamish McGregor." But when somebody asks out of interest: "Which part of Scotland is your family from?" then I am deeply offended and insulted and "traumatized". And I cry: "Lady! I am German! Born and bred in Niederschäffolsheim!" And then I go on twitter and make the rounds on lots of TV shows and tell everybody who wants to hear it or not how deeply offended I am.
All the paranoid who say it was a mendacious and elaborate set up are wrong. How could anybody predict what the aristocrat would say and who she would say it to? Anyway the aristocrat apologised in person yesterday, why would she do that if she was so innocent?
Buckingham Palace made a HUGE mistake with Lady Susan Hussey One comment under the video says: "An appeaser is somebody who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Winston Churchill
The video is an opinion piece with no helpful substance. I thought you were going to post a link with irrefutable evidence that the Aristocrat was forced somehow to follow a pre-prepared script.
Your ‘OH’ is followed by a question mark as if you are asking a question. As far as I am concerned the aristocrat said what she said completely voluntarily. If you can provide evidence to the contrary, like some kind of leading edge technology controlling her speech, or an elaborate ventriloquist trick, then what the aristocrat said is 100% on her. There is a lot of opinion on this issue, but can you prove the aristocrat was forced to say her stuff with actual evidence?
I guess I'm trying to figure out your angle here. I never argued that what she said wasn't "completely voluntarily." In fact, I don't think anyone in this thread has made that argument, yet now you want evidence to the contrary. For a claim no one made. Who has disputed that? It's like you are having a different conversation in your head.
The dispute is about whether the aristocrat was ‘sandbagged’ tricked or entrapped or tricked in some way, she wasn’t.
Lady Hussey asked a perfectly normal and natural question to a person who was dressed in traditional African garb and was using an African name. It’s wasn’t racist to ask her origins. It’s not like she was using her other British name and wearing typical UK garb. Lady Hussey apologized because that’s what polite Brits do when they upset somebody. What Fulani was doing in her conversation with Lady Hussey was basically ‘taking the piss’ which in this case was treating somebody badly to get what she wanted. I bet Fulani isn’t so happy now, her charity is under investigation related to the charity’s finances. Anyways, talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.