‘Decisions are imminent’ on charges in Trump’s effort to overturn 2020 election

clingy pet is funny.... but so is this story around the Soros/Meatball "endorsement". Stay with me here...

The EXACT moment some in the MAGA realize others in the MAGA aren't capable of critical thinking (actually, none of them are, but this indicates there might be sub levels)

SNIP
Since Soros’ remarks, DeSantis-aligned pundits have fired back.

“This ‘endorsement’ story is a simple IQ test,” DeSantisworld pundit David Reaboi wrote, while calling out Lake’s initial Twitter post. “Soros saying DeSantis is effective and smart is an attempt to get the Left he funds to focus on beating him. It’s a **warning** not an endorsement. FFS, how can some of you people be so dumb?”

Wisconsin conservative talk-radio host Jay Weber wrote: “Soros didn’t endorse DeSantis. What a dipshit spin on his comments.”
ENDSNIP

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumpworld-launches-bonkers-attack-desantis-041023980.html

Remember David and Jay, they were YOUR people until Meatball became viable....

Also, Soros never said Meatball is "effective and smart" either, so it seems like both sides fail this simple IQ test....

Hope this story continues to provide more humor in the days ahead!

 

"“We find by unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took place in the Georgia 2020 presidential election that could result in overturning that election,” the grand jury wrote."

Which is a strange sentence. How did they find that, did they do their own audits or just report what they heard or were they just relying on the court cases where were mostly dismissed on standing issues. I'm not saying there was enough to overturn the election. Just over 11,000. 10,599 would not be widespread? And what did that have to do with whether or not Trump violated the law in this case? HE believed there was and beliefs aren't necessarily criminal.

 

1. Most of the cases were dismissed due to lack of evidence. Stating that they were dismissed on "standing issues" is either a lack of research on your part or deliberate misinformation.
2. Beliefs are not criminal, action is criminal. I don't care if he believed he won by 1 vote or 10 million votes. His ACTION was to ask the SOS to change a certified vote total. That would be election fraud. His request that the SOS do that is "Solicitation to commit election fraud. A violation of GA 21-2-604

 

His belief belies his intent, and with intent clear on non-criminal action, there's nothing to stand on(as I elaborated much more thoroughly.). Trump won't be charged with any criminal stature in the state of Georgia. And more than likely nor will anyone else. With DA's publicly vested and needing coverage like they need oxygen, if there were something to report favorable to her, you'd best believe your ass she'd release it.

 

Pay a little more attention to what is going on and you might just understand it. It is very clear the the Special Grand Jury report contains multiple recommendations to indict people over the attempt to pressure the SOS into changing vote totals AND the "fake elector" scheme. The reason the DA was against making the report public is due to concerns over those who did not testify also being indicted. There could be some issues with "due process" if their names are released as recommended they be indicted and then not being indicted.

You see, unlike what you think is the motivation behind DA actions, for the most part, they are motivated by justice, not some need for "publicity"

 

It's been nearly a month? Are charges now Super-Duper imminent?

 

Most were not heard for lack if standing. He ask for fraudument votes to be found and NOT counted as I have shown you.

 

Georgia Special Grand Jury Forewoman says the list of indictment recommendations is "not a short list"

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/not-short-list-trump-probe-194839301.html

Anyone who doubts that the SGJ recommended that Trump be indicted is going to be very disappointed when the list of indictment recommendations is made public.

 

The NYT's article

"Asked whether the jurors had recommended indicting Mr. Trump, Ms. Kohrs gave a cryptic answer: “You’re not going to be shocked. It’s not rocket science,” adding “you won’t be too surprised.”

https://archive.is/Hydsa

 

Yes, and this Ms. Kohrs is now out there on every news show who will have her making a complete fool out of herself...

It's one thing to give an on-record interview to a print media, but this is something completely different...

STOP BOOKING HER.... This can only help the potential indictees, not hurt them....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/cnn-panel-cringes-trump-grand-050305226.html

 

It's been almost a month.
Where are these "imminent" decisions?

 

She's following the Trump "Infrastructure Week" methodology.... Promise something then fail to deliver.... Although I suspect she'll only do it once....

Also, decisions may have been made, but physically filing indictments obviously have not.

Finally, her timeline is now back in her control after the release of "portions" of the GJ report turned out to be the biggest nothingburger since Mike Pence...

 

The idiot Valley Girl with a giggle worse than even Kamala Harris, with her cable news tour has revealed the entire Trump Grand Jury to be yet another bad sham. They had no case, and this is them throwing it, so that they can say "we really had him, but then that dumb girl screwed it all up, and he got away, again!'



And good point on Pence, though, even as a nothing burger, he is a thousand times better choice for VP than Kamala.

Mike Pence Seems to Think Being a Conservative Means Letting the Left Get Away With Everything.

He showed himself a surrender-monkey when he was Gov in the RFRA fight with the Left. We already have enough of those in the GOP.


Thank you sir, may I have another?

'In this era of deep crisis and division in America, Mike Pence wants to be the Republican nominee for president of the United States in 2024, and he wants you to know that a Pence presidency would be a comforting reassertion of the Republican Party’s familiar role as the placid, country-clubbing controlled opposition, never rocking the boat as the Left sets the agenda politically, economically, culturally, and in every other way.'

He offers the same thing that Romney offered and the result will be the same. Dems will keep him on defense and beat him.

VIOLATES REAGAN'S ELEVENTH COMMANDMENT - THOU SHALL NOT SPEAK EVIL OF A FELLOW REPUBLICAN

'Pence called out Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) for being so un-conservative as to do something actually to resist the Left and stop it in its tracks. Good, solid, colorless Men of the Right such as Mike Pence just don’t do such things.'

AND THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH YOU.



'Pence is now the second Republican presidential hopeful to invoke conservatism in order to justify impotence and inaction in the face of the Left’s increasingly open lust to corrupt our children. Former Maryland governor Larry Hogan, who also shares Pence’s fantasies about being the GOP nominee for president in 2024, brought up his alleged conservative credentials to explain his opposition to DeSantis.'

'There is nothing that stands in opposition to small-government principles in acting to protect children from sexualization and gender madness. There is nothing “big government” about acting to preserve parents’ rights to raise their own children without government bureaucrats using taxpayer money to erode those rights. There is nothing about preserving the principle of limited government in taking away special legal perks that alleged entertainers have received from the government once they start behaving as arrogant social engineers and forcing upon children an agenda that most parents find abhorrent.'

WE AREN'T LOOKING FOR ROMNEY II. WE ARE LOOKING FOR A BETTER BEHAVED TRUMP.

 

Wow.......just..... WOW! It's like the Nile River of a stream of consciousness...with memes!!

Did you hear yet Emily dabbles in witchcraft?

Can't WAIT until Mango does... that should set his highly flammable hair ablaze.....

 

Fantasized about meeting Trump.

She may meet him now.

Trump May Take Legal Action In Georgia Election Case After Forewoman's Bizarre Media Tour.

Her media interviews describe 'a “carnival, clown-like atmosphere” that “takes away from the complete sanctity and the integrity and, for that matter, the reliability” of the investigation.'



I didn't realize what you were referring to, but, it must be this here from her pinterest account. I didn't realize that she was into spells and witchcraft, but, that's not the point I was making. Everything else aside, she clearly, has no sense of the solemn duty that is a Grand Jury that measures whether or not felony charges are to be brought. When we charge someone with a felony we are talking about stripping them of various basic even sacred human rights. In capital cases, it can even mean end their life. That calls for an awareness of a certain gravity that she shows no evidence of. My goodness, being hellbent on criminal charges, small wonder you are horrified.



Not just Emily.

'Fulton County DA Fani Willis also undermined the probe by giving media interviews, tweeting a political cartoon of herself and investigation witness Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and having a conflict of interest involving a target in the investigation.'

She tweeted out a cartoon of the proceedings? They do think this is a carnival.



This is her idea of proper behavior during a very serious matter involving a former US President and a senior leader in the US Senate?



https://www.nytimes.com › 2022 › 07 › 25 › us › georgia-prosecutor-fani-willis-trump.html
Prosecutor Is Barred From Pursuing Criminal Case Against Trump Ally ...

'A judge on Monday disqualified Fani T. Willis, the Atlanta area prosecutor, from developing a criminal case against an ally of Donald J. Trump, citing a conflict of interest.'

Yet she ran this Grand Jury? Seems like Trump may have a point here.

'Trump had blasted the forewoman’s actions on Truth Social Wednesday, calling the investigation an “illegal kangaroo court.”'



Seems unhelpful for your desired outcome.

 

I'm highly skeptical the Trump team of clowns will file anything at this point, before an indictment is even handed down to him....

But, they rarely fail to entertain us all, so who knows...

 

And yet it's this jury foreman clown this is giggling conducting herself in a highly unserious manner and doing a very inappropriate media tour.

 

Hell, the mere mention of the word Trump is the leftist dinner, lunch, social gathering and bedroom talk for many

 

Which was clearly allowed by the judge in charge... and has NOTHING to do with your point about Trump filing something, unless you can connect those dots..

 

She's taken a hammer to the process.

'Oddball' Trump grand jury foreperson Emily Kohrs dealt a 'terrible blow' to prosecution, Andrew McCarthy says. 'She basically flouted the secrecy rules of the grand jury,'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/oddba...errible-blow-prosecution-andrew-mccarthy-says

'Trump grand juror gives smiling, laughing media tour about possible indictments

'Emily Kohrs, the foreperson of the special Fulton County (Ga.) grand jury, gave gleeful interviews to CNN and MSNBC that left some legal observers scratching their heads.'



'In a pair of appearances on CNN and NBC News, Kohrs appeared to strongly hint that Trump was among those recommended for criminal charges while laughing, joking and making animated facial expressions that seemed to provide answers she knew she shouldn't be offering.'

'She flouted the judge's order, and she makes the whole enterprise down there in Georgia look like it's a, you know – Trump called it a kangaroo court," McCarthy said.'



'"Whether it really is a kangaroo court or not, in that colorful sense, we'll have to see as the proceedings go by. But it's absolutely true that it's a terrible blow for their legal system and for this particular investigation, which has already had problems, because, you know, the [Fulton County] District Attorney [Fani Willis] is an elected Democrat who had a lot to say publicly about Trump even before this investigation opened," he continued. "This doesn’t help them present the impression that they’re running a tight, ethical, professional investigation."'

TRUMP GRAND JURY FOREPERSON'S BIZARRE PRESS BLITZ STUNS LIBERAL MEDIA, SURPRISES LEGAL EXPERTS: ‘NO UPSIDE’



'Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney previously ordered that any recommendations on who should, or should not, be prosecuted would remain secret – for now – to protect their due process rights.

'"First of all, why this person is talking on TV, I do not understand," Cooper said. "She's clearly enjoying herself. But, I mean, is this responsible? She was the foreperson of this grand jury!"'

'"This is a horrible idea," said Honig, a CNN legal analyst. "And I guarantee you that prosecutors are wincing, watching her go on this… It’s a prosecutor’s nightmare."'



JOY BEHAR FUMES OVER TRUMP GRAND JURY MEMBER TOUR: ‘SHOULDN’T SHE BE KEEPING HER BIG BAZOO SHUT?'

'On MSNBC, "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough was heard saying "Oh, God" as co-host Mika Brzezinski offered a recap of all the interviews Kohrs gave, which also included the Associated Press, New York Times and Atlanta Journal-Constitution.'

'MSNBC columnist and former prosecutor Barbara McQuade wrote Thursday that she was "mortified" about Kohr's "reckless" media tour. '



'"I was a prosecutor for 20 years. What you want as the prosecutor is to convince the public that the investigation has been done by the book, in accordance with the rule of law, and that the tribunal is reliable and also following the law," McCarthy said.'

'"So, any time you have somebody violating the law in a very blatant way, even if that person were more articulate and seemed to have, you know, both feet on the ground and be a more serious, grounded person than the jury foreman, it would still be very bad for the prosecution and really for the court, and the court’s reputation for integrity," he continued.'

'"It would be bad to have somebody in such a big case flouting the rules this way. So that's the big problem for them. The more you watch these clips, the more you kind of roll your eyes about the whole enterprise down there."'

 

My wife is 100% convinced Witch Emily is a diehard Trumper running a false flag operation of a sort... Sort of like when the Dobbs decision leaked and MAGA assumed it was a liberal near the court...

I have nothing to convince her otherwise... and I'm sure you don't either... Emily is certainly silly enough to fall in that category...

But I love your quotes from talking head/ass Andrew McCarthy saying she "violated the law", when her judge says she didn't.... Keep those coming!!

 

No doubt. I mean we all knew this process was a witch hunt from the beginning. But it’s pretty much undeniable now.

 

Yeah, it's hard to get around that.

 

It’s good that they found the evil witch and will now burn him. Win-win all around.

 

So did Hilary.