you mean hypothetical outcomes that run contrary to all known reality? like criminals giving up their guns.
No, I mean understanding the issue before you put your 2¢ in. You haven't read parts 2 & 3 so you haven't the advantage of knowing all of the facts.
I have read this entire thread and I suspect I understand this issue far better than you do since I was an American federal law enforcement officer and I actually own and am expert with AR 15 rifles. You cannot own them and I doubt you are in a position to understand our criminal laws
Give up, you can’t argue with useful idiots; gun banners rely on those that have skewed perceptions of reality. ;
I love the contradictory arguments-he wants to ban all firearms (from private ownership) and cannot understand how that punishes or harasses those who own firearms. I think this sort of disconnect comes from the fact most gun banners are not honest as to why they want to ban guns
I can remember the candidate in a Missouri election, being caught on tape, thinking she was talking to a supporter, that said she had to appear to support the 2nd A to get elected, but would work toward anti gin laws.The GOP depends on the MSM to manipulate Useful idiots. It’s easy to do, the current leftist education system doesn’t teach critical thinking by design.
Here’s the source of my reference… fun, but also scary. https://abcstlouis.com/local-politi...campaign-admitting-it-hides-views-from-voters
The point is he doesn't have one. this is why gun control if you are a politician is career suicide. nobody will vote for it because it is a dumb idea. come on we are using arguments from 30 years ago because they haven't been debunked.