Utterly pathetic. I address this "anomaly" and all you can do is highlight the lie the video makes about this footage being taken down! Does it not smack you squarely in the forehead that they actually discussed it on live audio! The entire onboard footage was released by NASA on DVD boxsets. I think it is absolutely absurd that you think they are trying to hide this piece of film when it is plastered everywhere and freely available. Apollo 12 broke their camera after a few minutes, I don't recall them ever having ANY video index for this mission. ALL the 16mm film is stored at Johnson Space Center and linked on the online internet archive system. You haven't even watched that have you!? After the dish moves during the pitch rotation it quickly settles and there is ZERO movement even as it continues to rotate "upside down" to how the dish was suddenly "hanging down". THAT actually proves the opposite to your claim, how can you fail to see this? ADDRESS THIS! Pretending things aren't there - that's what conspiracy theorists do. APOLLO 12 16MM ONBOARD FILM : NASA/Johnson Space Center : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-30#post-1074385661 The LEM continues to rotate and the radar dish stops dangling when the short wire that it's hanging from is wound up. This is perfectly consistent with its being in gravity.
Why does every damn thing have to be done for you! The docking footage is right at the start! It begins at 8.50! From this video you will notice (or damn well should!) that the footage has been inverted by some youtube users from the original, no idea why. But HERE is all that original footage the right way up and in its entirety. NASA Video: Apollo 12 16mm Film by the Astronauts (1969) - YouTube
Pathetic. So we have self-winding magic wires now!? Absolutely ANY ridiculous excuse from you rather than admit your failures. There is no movement whatsoever even when it is 90 degrees to the point where it started moving. This thread should be retitled - Things that prove the Moon landings!
I think it's clear to anyone who takes the time to watch the footage that the radar dish came loose and fell because of gravity. . http://www.politicalforum.com/index...tart-to-finish.602133/page-10#post-1074316476 It even swings back and forth the way it would in gravity. The viewers can come to their own conclusions.
Well firstly, you are most certainly NOT the spokesperson for ANYONE. The reality is that ANYONE who watches this can see it occurs just as a very big mass (several tons) is acted upon by a thruster. This force is what makes the initial movement as the lightweight connector seems to break. It swings back and forth the way it would in space. HOWEVER, it STOPS moving even as the craft continues its rotation. From this, ANYONE with any clue, can deduce that the force that caused it to move has stopped, ergo it cannot be gravity as it would just tilt with the rotating LM. The stock spam reply. The viewers NEVER support your views and you ignore inconvenient truths. The viewers have already seen this: HERE: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074375897 HERE: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074316564 HERE: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074235516 HERE: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-that-we-landed.604239/page-2#post-1073774696 HERE: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...are-on-the-moon.580330/page-2#post-1074385704 I actually genuinely wonder how you can do this given you KNOW that your answers are just absurd. You KNOW the game is up. You KNOW that Cernan kicks dust up as high as his boots (just that closes the whole thing). You KNOW that Young has a small arc of dust in perfect sync with his jump (just THAT closes the whole thing). You have ZERO explanation for the LRV footage, performed multiple times by NASA on the Moon. Footage so absolutely flawless that it too closes this whole pathetic hoax case.
I say the falling radar dish proves the hoax all by itself. There are a lot of other anomalies that prove the hoax all by themselves too. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-18#post-1073057326 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ers-are-corrupt.441261/page-2#post-1072215068 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-16#post-1072816044 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-30#post-1074375800 The viewers can look at everything and come to their own conclusions.
I say you are ignoring a) its orientation - on the original footage it "falls" UP! b) the very irrefutable subsequent NON movement as it continues to rotate.. Anybody who views that objectively and honestly will see that the only movement is from the thruster burst and once it stops, so does the swaying. The fact that it then stops completely, proves to an honest person that it is in space. No there are not and you just ignored that list I provided both here and on the links they point to. It must terrify you to be wrong after 20 years of forum spamming. Your link 1: No specific claim, just ridiculous links to links to big lists all addressed and all responses ignored, as you always do. This is your never-ending tactic. Repeat your wall of batshit spam and ignore everything. You were doing this very same thing with me over 12 years ago and you are still doing it. That is just so very pathetic. Your link 2: Batshit about a flap on the LRV that defies logic and ignores how they filmed all that footage. ALL addressed numerous times. Then this 20 year obsession with a flag! Unbelievable that you STILL spew out this garbage. Your link 3: This is the crap about noises on the footage. It contradicts every claim made about how it was done (ie. sound added after video - to incorporate all the live sporting events that get discussed). You failed miserably to answer why the hell they would have hot mics in a supposed soundless vacuum stage. Duhhh! Your link 4: Just a vague link to an idiot youtuber you blundered upon. Zero analysis, zero quantative observation on what to watch. ZERO analysis on why this "shillstomper" has provided any salient evidence. And again the spam response. @Scott You ignored this totally obvious thing! @Scott Ditto! @Scott Completely ignored or obfuscated as always and what responses you give, like bouncing soil or diversion to irrelevant crap, are totally useless. Now those items are actually ALL irrefutable evidence. On top of this we have 842lbs of lunar samples examined by the world's geology community and your response is to dump/spam a load of videos with ZERO analysis as always and one of the most idiotic websites I've ever seen - debunked here.
There are no anomolies which prove a hoax. yes they can and have reached their own conclusions and the viewers know you are wrong but continue to cling to a proven lie
Here's a recently published article by a hoax-believer. Evidence Relating to NASA Moon Landings, Unexplained Flaws: What Is Reality? What Is Illusion? https://www.globalresearch.ca/nasa-advanced-virtual-reality-what-reality-what-illusion/5842596
Debunked rehashed crap. It begins with the highly ignorant "wrong shadows" claim showing an example where they converge. So tell everyone @Scott how does NASA fake the illumination to produce CONVERGING shadows? Draw me the light pattern.
Here's a website I "just found" that Debunks every piece of junk from that last rubbish link: https://www.clavius.org/a11rear.html Child's play to debunk this:
Hoax-believers have made mistakes but there are some very clear anomalies* that prove the hoax. Those mistakes don't make those anomalies go away. The viewers can look at the anomalies and come to their own conclusions. * http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-31#post-1074385963
Everyone knows the moon landing was fake. They used the fake stage on an old Bond movie filmed in Las Vegas.
Ahhh your routine spam reply. So, you posted the link. Pick one thing on it that you think I can't do the same thing with, as I just did with the shadows. We've already closed the case on this foolish hoax claim. It's been proven time and time again that we went. Not one of your spammed anomalies stands up to scrutiny I've identified numerous segments of film that are impossible to fake that you simply cannot explain. We know the rocks are from the Moon, experts in their thousands confirm this. I detailed numerous aspects about them that you had no answer for.
I already knew that shadow issue was a mistake made by hoax-believers; I posted that article because it discusses the issue of slow-motion and it points out a way that zero-G can be faked. Go ahead and analyze anything you want from that article.
Uhuh, so your link is basically just rehashed crap, debunked to death, but you've discovered a modern way to fake zero-g? What the hell has any of that to do with the Apollo moon landings that provably landed six times?
One fact that has not been addressed by both sides of this argument is –– how did the astronauts survive the massive amounts of radiation from the Van Allen Radiation Belt, yet no one suffered any ill effects from it? Based on the requirement to provide sufficient protection such as adding lead sheeting to the command module which would have resulted in extra weight that would have hindered the launch all the astronauts were dressed in was aluminum foil. In an interview with a NASA official stated they no longer have the technology that they used to overcome that hurdle, they destroyed it! More like there was no tech and no one went. Even the soles of the space suits are different to those of the famous "footprints" on the moon's surface is BS. The Moon Landing: Stanley Kubrick's Greatest Film | How NASA and Hollywood Fooled the World
"The total dosage for the trip is only 16 Rads in 68.1 minutes. Because 68.1 minutes is equal to 1.13 hours, his is equal to a dosage of 16 Rads / 1.13 hours = 14.0 Rads in one hour, which is well below the 300 Rads in one hour that is considered to be lethal. Also, this radiation exposure would be for an astronaut outside the spacecraft during the transit through the belts. The radiation shielding inside the spacecraft cuts down the 14 Rads/hour exposure so that it is completely harmless."
Not to forget the astronauts went through the VARB twice and ––– Radiation levels on the moon are 200 times the levels on Earth, study shows My questions are, how did the astronauts dodge any radiation sickness wearing only light-weight space suits, and the fact that a NASA talking head stated back in the day, "We destroyed that technology we used then". Why would you do such an act, is that because there had never been any technologies used and no lunar landings? BTW, did you watch the video?
