...and there it is!! OCTAs soooooo freaking desperate for affirmation they look to CARTOON SHOWS for reinforcement!!! Hahahahaha......puuuriceless!!!
Who do you think reaches more people, your pet film 'loose change' or 'South Park'? Your camp looks to failed film students, heroin dealers and Charlie Sheen. I think I'll stick with mine. Thanks.
What does your constant lying about loose change accomplish? It's beyond pathetic that your only form of retaliation for me constantly proving you wrong is to falsely associate me with loose change. That said, it doesn't change the fact you guys are so desperate you look to CARTOON SHOWS for evidence! HAHAHAHA!!!!! It's beyond hilarious!!!
I forgot to add in Judy Wood, PhD. Your camp has some great leadership! You are associated with LC because you are in the 'truther'/ 'loose change' camp. Firmly entrenched there. I could also point out that puts you in the same camp as 'Whiteandaware', but that would just be cruel. I'll still take Parker & Stone over Avery & Sheen. Thanks!
More dishonesty. Do you think adding to your history of false accusations helps anything? No worries....im sure South Park can guide you....LOL!!!
No, here's your namesake. You finished hurling insults yet? I know its part of your camp's LC credo, but you might want to try to focus.
Considering your desire to look to cartoons for support it is not surprising you look at toys too. Hahaha....
Ah yes, someone who can't discern between playful suggestion and actual argument. Another twoofer is shown to be unable to discern what is real and what is not. That makes only the 34290872389023608923460789th time that has happened in 9 years.
What is true to form here is your constant dishonesty and you're so predictably intellectually lazy you googled my username and came back with the first thing you found: http://www.google.com/m?q=skystryker&client=ms-opera-mini&channel=new
Except your camp elevated it to the next level. But feel free to ignore that like sources that change what original sources say just to try and make the OCT appear stronger. There is not a single OCTA on this board that can legitimately defend the OCT.
Good grief. It scares the hell out of me knowing people like you have kids. At the same time, it helps explain a lot of what is wrong. It must have been a pure accident it was the first return on the google search. Are you really this desperate? I mean, you've been beaten so bad on the 9/11 issue that you have to search (literally) for ways to compensate? Hahahaha.....
Your keyboard is sticky again. It's spelled "Hannibal". As for me being 'beaten' ... opinions vary. Seems to me the accepted narrative is still accepted. The fire and safety regulations that NIST has proposed in their 9/11 reports are being implemented world wide. You will be so kind as to leave any mention of my children or my family out of any future posts. Thank you.
You're the one who exploited your own child to explain your false accusations. Don't exploit your own kids for your petty agendas.
You made a false statement/ accusation. I told you the source of my knowledge. You followed that up with an insult to my parenting skills. Leave the personal stuff out.
You linked the source of your knowledge to the gijoe website in this post: http://www.politicalforum.com/3574035-post32.html After I show you simply used the first available link from a google search you then exploit your son as the source. Crikey. That is why it is scary people like you are parents. What kind of values could you possibly be infecting others with when you dance on such trivial matters?
I found the picture on search. To demonstrate exactly what I was talking about. "Sky Stryker", the Joe toy, is the only thing that uses that particular spelling. I just found that out on a Bing search. You named yourself after a toy. Get over it. I've asked you politely twice now to leave my family out of your personal attacks. This makes three, and it's the last time.
What are you saying that you believe? That the top 13% of a 1360 foot skyscraper can fall 12 feet and TOTALLY COLLAPSE 90+ stories of the building in less than 18 seconds? It's a bit of a physics problem. But then the NIST spends THREE YEARS and $20,000,000 producing 10,000 pages which do not even specify the total amount of concrete in the buildings. Physics is incapable of caring what anyone believes. psik
Care to estimate how much that 13% weighed? Care to estimate how much of that 90+ stories was hollow? Ever hear of inertia?
Inertia...versus 47 steel VERTICAL columns (that's steel pointing towards the sky for the intellectually impaired). Inertia...accounts for the free fall speed at which the towers came down. Hollow? Except for the 47 center vertical columns you mean? How do you get the resistance of 90+ stories of vertical steel columns to go away and allow the buildings to fall at the same speed as if they were in a vacuum?? Inertia...There's a new twist on physics for ya.