Should Women Who NEVER Want Children Remain Abstinent Forever?

That post supports my assertion, not hers. READ!

 

You know there are a plethora of birth control strategies. Celibate isn't the only option.

If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she should practice birth control, beyond the rhythm method. Google birth control and you get a bunch of options. Of course, if she can't be bothered with any of them, she can simply kill the fetus.

 

I have been told by the pro-abortion crowd that contraception 'does not always work' therefore the ONLY answer is for women to keep their knees together or have serial abortions.

What is really amazing is how folks that self-identify as 'progressive' think there is only 1 way to have sex.

I have also said over and over that I counsel men to make sure they have a commitment and commit themselves every time they put their penis in a vagina...with contraception or not because there is always the chance that the contraception could fail or she could be lying or mistaken about taking it. Either way, a man has 0 rights and may even have to pay.

 

Who cares, just abort the baby. Surely women and men do not intentionally give life they dont want. Abortion in and of itself is wrong, unless society can cater so as to assist the baby to live.

 

As society has done for many years. There are many social programs out there designed to do just that.

 

Most societies dont, hence abortion is quite necessary, let alone allowed.

In our countries, yes, but not others.

 

Yet it is allowed in the ones that do; therein lies the problem with your assertions.

 

Not at all because even in those that do have such facilities, killing a fetus is still not, in an of itself, immoral.

 

I see, so a "facility" is what is required to turn an abhorrent brutal savage procedure designed to barbarically kill people into something "moral".

Who knew?

 

What would that be, some sort of procedure for administering capital punishment?

 

Not sure? It is Megadeathfan's assertion, ask him?

 

Completely correct.

Examples can be drawn from almost every daily act. Do you support a child's right to vote? Why not? Because they dont have the mental capacity/ advanced facility to do so. Similarly, why do you consider animals inferior to humans? I assume you eat meat, do you not? Is this because you consider them inferior based on their lack of the mental facility to rationalize?

Yes 'who would have known' such thought existed!?

 

Yes, possibly.

 

your attempt to manipulate is noted

it's a simple mathematical equation

sperm + egg = baby

sperm does not touch egg = no baby

match + gasoline = fire

gasoline by itself = no fire

so, let the woman be "open for business" all that she wants. If sperm doesn't touch egg then no baby.

 

Women who choose not to have children are useless.

There should be a universal law and ruleing that relocates their useless, good-for-nothing back-sides to a un-dissclosed island in the North Artic Sea.

 

If reproduction is the sole qualification for useful living, humanity only needs a few men to carry on the species, so the rest should be eliminated.

If society actually highly-valued the results of reproduction, the children, society would then also highly-value the ones who bear the most of the work of reproduction, the women. Then there would be few women who did choose not to have children.

 

And when there are massive food shortages due to overpopulation, breeders should be forced to decide which crotch dropping gets it's neck snapped.

 

*puts a match in a bucket full of gas.*

No fire.

 

Don't tease us Kmisho!

 

'Haters gonna hate'...babies that is.

If that's how you feel...do everyone a favor and sterilize yourself NOW!

 

Is "baby hater" the best you can do?

 

Well if you're a sexist like you, then yeah you might think that. But that doesn't make it true.

How about you learn to spell first.

 

So is a seed a tree, then?

 

And another question, perhaps even more important, once the seed becomes a tree, why is it ok to cut it down?

 

A tree is a plant. Apples to rocks comparison.