Actually, the WH made a press release on the 7th about the Presidents trip to Florida and the school visit, interestingly enough the mass media has seemed to have lost the days leading up to the 11th. When the Pentagon was struck, we were basically in a state of war until the leadership sorted things out. The president should had been forcibly removed from that classroom and moved to a secure location, he wasn't. Either the SS failed, or someone knew something.
He was kept safe and unharmed, and you classify that as Secret Service failure? Interesting point of view.
I wonder when the conspiracy theorists will finally (and grudgingly) admit their preposterous theory is all 'pie in the sky' BS, concoted for the weak minded or those who are unable to think for themselves, or in urgent need of making an urgent appointment with an optometrist. Looking on the bright side, I suppose it keeps them off the streets causing mischief elsewhere.
Please quote anywhere in official Secret Service training that says the President is to be forcibly removed and sent to a secure location. Betcha cant.
I don't think there's anything in the BS manual that suggests the President should be uninterrupted and left in a public location for all to see, while the country is at war, and while the VP is hiding underground. Are they saying Cheney was more important than the POTUS?..oh...wait. Well...anyway...that's just where you want the POTUS during a time of war. Reading goat books and out of the way while the dickster "handles" things, safely tucked away, underground, while monkeyboy does his photo op.
Pretty much describes those who have supported the official government position about what happened on 9/11. You are being treated like a ******* mushroom, and you seem to be happy with that. D********!
When you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. We know the generally accepted explanation of 9/11 events is true, in part because there's no other way it could have happened, and you've never been able to challenge that concept by providing some other way in which it could have happened. That's what you need to accomplish a paradigm shift.
And you only say this because you know the majority of the evidence was sent away and destroyed and the balance is sitting under national security blanket. If you were a REAL American who wanted the truth, then you would be on the right side lobbying Congress and the exec to release the data and info.
You don't know what the SS was doing moments after the 1st strike, they could have been all over the Bush staff pleading to move the prez. Did somebody know something and ordered the SS to stand down? We don't know.
Show evidence for the bolded statement, please. Also, how much lobbying have you done personally, Mr. "REAL American"?
We know he was safe and unharmed. Who do you suppose outranks the Secret Service in protecting the President?
The only mushrooms in this world are those who pathetically refuse to recognise what's in front of their own eyes and follow every imaginary, fanciful, convoluted conspiracy theory placed under their noses. They evidently prefer to live on another planet. Maybe we could make them all happy by sending them on the next spaceship to Mars!
Great! Thanks, for that, I have just been looking for a book to hang in my toilet. I just hope it doesn't give me diarrhoea.
Proof? I'll be more specific: List what was "sent away and destroyed" or "sitting under national security blanket." Explain how each piece could potentially change the generally accepted explanation of events. I won't hold my breath waiting for your proof. As soon as you provide me some proof the "majority" of the evidence is unavailable, I'll be happy to.
A perfect description of an Ozian. WTC 7 was clearly brought down by controlled demolition, yet you Ozians believe the failure of a single column brought that building down. Nobody is that f***** s*****
Why would 7 be brought down in a controlled demolition? And why would insurance companies pay off if it was? too many holes in your 'clearly'
We know that responding to you (in general) to you is almost completely pointless, therefore, I generally do not because it is well, pointless. I have my opinions as to who and what you are, and you'll not change your disinformation tactics regardless of what I post. So why do it? I'm only interested in posting information and engaging in debate with honest people, who are honestly looking for truth, for which I do post information. There are quite a few "regulars" who continually combat that concept, of which, you are one. Now that I've just completely wasted time responding to your rhetoric, I'll revert to disengaging you once again.
Consider that WTC7 was the command and control center, and that flight 93 may have been intended for it. They're the two biggest oddities that seem to be each others mate IMO. I don't really know for sure though. I only know for sure, that the "official" BS story, as presented, is BS.
There are still some people in the world who insist there is a monkey in every hole. No matter how many time you inform them otherwise, they refuse to believe you.Do you know why? Because they walk around with their eyes shut and ears closed.
Why would the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor, or why did Hitler invade Russia? In both cases an ass kicking was the inevitable consequence. Clarity has nothing to do with many things, especially when dealing with national or international events. Why did the previous and current president allow weapons to be sold to mexican cartels?
One, we stopped selling oil to japan and quit selling scrap metal to them, and in their eyes we weren't as big as Russia,whom the defeated in 1901. And two: Hitler was crazy, and Three: who knows? ad finally what does this have to do with my questions on building 7?