The truth is starting to come out. The CIA knew an attack was coming before 911. They knew at least Two of the men involved that were already in America because they had tracked them and knew they were killers. They deliberately withheld that information from the FBI. http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/10/03/1327211/wiki-editor-helps-reveal-pre-911-cia-mistakes http://www.secrecykills.com/transcript
almost any of the books on the subject. to include Clarke, Richard A., Against All enemies, Inside Americas War on Terror. New York: Free Press, 2004. (Original Source)(P) Then admit that you're wrong.
You are correct that we knew some of the hijackers were in the country, but not that there was a 9/11 in the offing, which is quite a bit different than your conspiracy-esque implication. Try reading James Bamford's "The Shadow Factory." A friend of mine is in it!
All the military and medical exercises scheduled the day before, the day of, and the day after paint a different picture.
sigh... There are always military exercises. What was the military exercise with Malaysia in September a cover for?
Operation Flaming Dragon! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKTKd9cCilo&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKTKd9cCilo&feature=related[/ame]
There were operations in Malaysia that specifically ran simulations of planes being flown into buildings (as was the case here in the states PRIOR TO and during 9/11)?
Simulations involving planes crashing into buildings were conducted prior to, and on 9/11 simultaneously. Remember the "is this real world or exercise?" conversation?
The Department of Agriculture has nothing to do with it, no matter how much natural fertilizer 'truthers' spread. Fine, provide an eyewitness testimony to your claim that "operations in Malaysia specifically ran simulations of planes being flown into buildings (as was the case here in the states PRIOR TO and during 9/11)"
http://www.911proof.com/9.html Simulation of planes being crashed into buildings for your reading pleasure.
Nothing on that page shows an eyewitness testimony to your claim that "operations in Malaysia specifically ran simulations of planes being flown into buildings (as was the case here in the states PRIOR TO and during 9/11)" An opinion blog is not evidence.
Are you referring to that episode of "The Lone Gunmen?" Great show. Too bad "they" had to eliminate it with extreme prejudice. They knew too much.
Watch the video, it seems the specific impact areas of WTC 1 , 2 and the Pentagon were modified prior to 9/11. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/211023-masterminds-9-11-a.html But of course this is all just a coincidence.
So are you claiming, as does the video, that the planes were aiming for certain floors? And what were the impact areas going to be before 9/11? Who changed them?
The fact that someone believes that is quite a revelation. You didn't answer my other question though, which what were the specific impact areas prior to 9/11 and who changed them?
You are asking a question that can only be answerd by those who planned the event? You act like you are a lawyer and you are cross examing someone Is this stupidity or do you actually believe you are constructing some sort of position to debate from?
You seem to know. You even stated that . . . Why would you state that if you didn't know it to be true? And if you know they were changed, why can't you say what they were changed from and who changed them? If you can't back up your claims, just say so.
Wow I just had a deja vu. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/203778-request-information-elevator-workers-2.html
So . . . elevator work was done and no permits can be found 10 years after the fact? Or no work was done but since a 9/11 blogger "claims" it was done there's a smoking gun? How exactly does this relate to 10aces claiming that the specific impact areas of WTC 1 , 2 and the Pentagon were modified prior to 9/11??