still dodging every point huh LOL not surprising do you want to talk about capitalization next? 20 posts and I will still throw those same questions you keep ducking in your face LOL
I have not dodged a single one of your ill conceived points. I've chased down each and every one of your tangents, off topic rants, and goofy attempts to deflect attention from the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about.
The least of my ability is more then enough to demolish the "kooky Collapse theories" generated by the best of yours.
Is that what you think you did? What don't you write a paper that "demolishes" Bazant and get it published? Is it because you have no idea what you're talking about? Why don't you simply explain how Bazant improperly calculated his energy balance? Is it because you don't know what you're talking about? Here's a simple one for someone who can "demolish" Bazant: What was the moment the steel was required to resist in order to prevent collapse initiation?
By all means tell us but use these: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb-1O2sMWok"]BIG BADDADDAAADDDDA BOOOOMA[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsePUn5-88c"]BAZANT CRUSH DOWN DEMONSTRATION!!![/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CARLAvm9T0"]BAZANT IS AN IDIOT[/ame] take your time
There goes Koko once again trying to pretend every building should react the same regardless of construction, materials, size or circumstances! Hey Koko, if I show you a couple matchbox cars crashing into each other unharmed, will you believe all cars can hit each other no matter what the construction, materials, size or circumstances? Or do you just play dumb when it suits you?
I dont believe anything the gubafia says. 911 proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that a hirise will by natural forces collapse into the greatest path of resistance. You do not need to know any more than that to be correct on the matter.
What you believe is up to you, but when you put forth seriously (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up paranoid delusions like failed controlled demolitions prove ANYTHING, well, it only exposes the sheer silliness of what you believe and what your beliefs are based upon.
No, that is just some (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up bull(*)(*)(*)(*) you came up with. Only you would try to pretend a single event with specific parameters somehow creates a law that covers every other event regardless of parameters. Just goes to show what kind of a mental giant you really are!
why? you like them better than the crap the gubafia gives you? yup there you have it ludicrous hi definition gubafia proof at lease the pics I put up show detail! LMAO
you must be a foreigner. that comes from gubbermint + mafia = gubafia. its life in the US today its why we have kooky collapse tin foilers.
And you must be blind to not notice the two flags on my posts....so 'gubafia'<eyeroll>, how old are you,seriously?