Racist Birther files ballot challenge in Alaska

So is anyone have proof that Obama's Official Certification Of Nomination Form were missing the Constitutional certification wording on it?

 

You said they were.

You mean to tell us now that you were just making it up?

That's not very logical.



Edited to add: I see Spock's been banned.... again.

 

I can't say that nobody cares if he is black or not, but I don't care one way or the other. I do have issues with him and with his wife and the comment she made on the campaign trail about "the first time", etc. Personally I don't know if he is a natural born citizen or not, just that there are some unanswered questions and he is a master at evading them. Time will tell however, it always does.

 

Because of course, releasing your birth certificate twice is "evasive."

 

It's kind of funny how this keeps happening in states Obama won't win anyway.

It's Alaska. Would him being on the ballot really matter anyway?

There are a handful of other states so conservative that it's not like Obama's appearance on the ballot would make a difference. I'm guessing Utah or Idaho is next.

 

Which makes the ballot challenge all the more interesting- if your fellow Alaskan thinks that Obama can't win the vote in Alaska, wonder why he is challenging the ballot then.

But still- since you deemed to join this discussion-

Do you agree with Gordon Epperly that Obama is not eligible to be on your ballot because Obama is a "Mulatto"?

 

And yet you keep responding....and keep dodging the question.

As our banned friend might say....Fascinating!

 

Trying to put words in my mouth. Sorry, doesn't work that way.

 

So Foolardi- since you think this guy is a plant.....do you agree or disagree with his premise that Obama is not eligible because he is a Mulatto?

 

Ah....and I so wanted to try to get Spock to answer a single question once before he got banned.....

 

What are the unanswered questions you have Coolwalker- maybe I can help you with those.

 

1. why does his aunt in Boston get away with being illegal and living in government housing.

2. And why is Obama seeking “REGIME CHANGE” with our closest ally in the Middle East, and peacekeeper with Israel? Where is the hue and cry from the Left on this?

3. Why so many social security cards with different numbers?

4. what does he have to hide about his grades in college?

5. who paid for Harvard? was it really that Sheik?

6. why does he hide from his communist ties, like his father who wrote a book called "Problems With Our Socialism" that advocates 100% taxation of the rich, communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land, and why did Obama's take as a Teen Mentor Frank Marshall Davis (a known CPUSA member)?

7. Why, speaking at Osawatomie High School, in Osawatomie, Kan., did Obama say: “Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ’50s and ’60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.” Sounds lile Obama embraces communism and that his primary goal is to turn America into a communist nation.

 

Ah I thought you had questions regarding his being a natural born Citizen.

Since your questions are unrelated to eligiblity, I will answer seperately.

 

There are over 20 million illegal aliens living in the United States, many of them known to the INS and not deported.

I think it is because his aunt is being treated like other illegal aliens by the INS, and that President Obama has not used his Executive Authority to tell the INS to treat her differently by specially expediting her deportation.

Personally, I am in favor of the legal deportation of any illegal alien, but I see no evidence that she has been treated any differently by the system. It appears to me to be part of our massive illegal immigration morass.

 

I frankly don't know what you mean. Since when has President Obama sought regime change in Israel? Sorry can't answer that question for you.

 

I have never seen any Obama social security card, nor have I seen any actual evidence that he has more than one social security card. So can't answer that question either.

 

No idea. Haven't seen any indication that Obama is hiding any of his college grades. All I have seen is that he- like McCain, Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich hasn't released them.

So I don't know what any of them have to hide. I suspect that they all believe that their college grades would just be used against them by their opponents, no matter what their grades were.

 

Don't know. Don't know who paid for his college, or Romney's or Gingrich's or Santorum's- as far as I know though, none of them had their college's paid for by any Sheik.

 

Racist and birther go together like bacon and eggs. You can also add criminal, loser, and scumbag with it too and it works just fine.

 

President Obama wrote two books talking about his relationship with his Father- whom after he was an infant, he met only one time, when his father visitied Hawaii when I believe Obama was 10 years old. What has Obama hidden? That the father that he never discussed politics with may have been a Communist?

How do you think his father's economic opinion's influenced the son that he never saw, and never had an opportunity to discuss economics or politics with?

As I recall, Obama's grandfather was friends with Frank Marshal. Obama wrote about it in his books also. As I recall he explains exactly why he hung out with Marshall, though I frankly don't recall the details.

I don't know about you...but as teenager, I don't think I ever knew the politics of any of my mentors. Some of them certainly could have been members of the perfectly legal Communist Party without me ever knowing it.

Was that a priority for you as a teenager?

 

Jeff don't you ever get tired of answering the same old retarded questions from the same old retarded people? I admire your perseverance though.

 

Well lets look at the entire quote- shall we?

Now, just as there was in Teddy Roosevelt's time, there is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, let's respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. "The market will take care of everything," they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes -- especially for the wealthy -- our economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesn't trickle down, well, that's the price of liberty.

Now, it's a simple theory. And we have to admit, it's one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That's in America's DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But here's the problem: It doesn't work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didn't work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It's not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the '50s and '60s. And it didn't work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, it's not as if we haven't tried this theory.

Remember in those years, in 2001 and 2003, Congress passed two of the most expensive tax cuts for the wealthy in history. And what did it get us? The slowest job growth in half a century. Massive deficits that have made it much harder to pay for the investments that built this country and provided the basic security that helped millions of Americans reach and stay in the middle class -- things like education and infrastructure, science and technology, Medicare and Social Security.

Remember that in those same years, thanks to some of the same folks who are now running Congress, we had weak regulation, we had little oversight, and what did it get us? Insurance companies that jacked up people's premiums with impunity and denied care to patients who were sick, mortgage lenders that tricked families into buying homes they couldn't afford, a financial sector where irresponsibility and lack of basic oversight nearly destroyed our entire economy.

We simply cannot return to this brand of "you're on your own" economics if we're serious about rebuilding the middle class in this country. (Applause.) We know that it doesn't result in a strong economy. It results in an economy that invests too little in its people and in its future. We know it doesn't result in a prosperity that trickles down. It results in a prosperity that's enjoyed by fewer and fewer of our citizens.

Nope- nothing like communism anywhere there.

And some of it is undeniably correct. The postwar booms of the '50's and 60's were the most prosperous times for the most Americans and were not the result of reducing regulation or reducing tax rates. Sounds like Obama is preaching solid Democratic/liberal philosophy here- that Capitalism is necessary but Capitalism by its nature has no regard for who it injures- Government regulations serve a purpose.

Sounds to me that is what you read into it. Doesn't sound like that to me. That speech could have been given by Clinton or Truman or FDR or even Teddy Roosevelt.

 

Coolwalker posted the questions politely and I enjoyed answering them.

Its a hobby.

 

Why would I put words in your mouth? It serves my purposes completely that you continue to sound clueless and unaware, and you take care of that with no help from yours truly.

 

HAHAHA. Your ignorance is appalling. She's not illegal anymore. A year or two back obama granted her asylum.!!!!

She was given special treatment in the extreme.