George Zimmerman prosecutors file list of witnesses, evidence in Trayvon Martin shoot

Who said that? Name one.

The figure heads on the left didn't say that. They whipped their listeners into a race hissy that got a bounty put on the head of GZ. The right has been saying what I said or been blasting the left wing media for their biased slant on the story.

 

Read the law.. read the charge.

It doesn't matter who threw the first punch. There was NOTHING going on that Sunday evening except in the mind of George Zimmerman.

 

It makes all the difference who threw the first punch.

Little Trayvon may have been annoyed by the attention he was getting from Zimmerman but that didn't give him the right to beat him up.

That only applies in Thugville.

 

George Zimmerman created the situation.. GZ gave Trayvon reasonable cause to be fearful for his safety.

That's why GZ was charged under Murder 2.

 

__________________

Had not the media first reported Zimmerman as white, this ho-hum incident would have never made it over the local radar screen.

Non-whites shooting other non-whites is as common as mosquitoes in Panama.

But a white shooting a black, now that's news that can be milked in the anti-white war
being waged in all white nations on the planet, especially here in the US.

Once it was clear that Zimmerman was not a white, the focus shifted to Stand Your Ground laws.
Of course, SYG laws mostly protect whites from blacks, so they must be eliminated to allow the
race war to proceed with less hindrance.

 

George Zimmerman created the situation.. GZ gave Trayvon reasonable cause to be fearful for his safety.

That's why GZ was charged under Murder 2.

 

You are fantasizing again.

Libs believe Zimmerman is guilty because they so much want him to be guilty.

Zimmerman may have annoyed little Trayvon.

Maybe even frightened the wee child, but all TM had to do was run home to daddy.

If something snapped inside and little Trayvon the angel became NO_LIMITS_N***A that was his mistake and the consequences are on him not Zimmerman.

 

This isn't a partisan issue, Mac..

Its about the law and the charges.

We don't premptively kill black teens because they MIGHT grow up to be thugs.

Until you understand the law and the charges you will continue to believe that this is a "liberal" conspiracy.

 

Of course it's partisan.

Everyone who wants to lynch Zimmerman is an Obama voter or Obama himself.

 

Now you're talking out of both sides of your mouth since you just assured us that little Trayvon was in fear for his life and attacked Zimmerman.

 

Of course it's a partisan and racial issue ... you think the cops would have let Zimmerman go with his murder weapon to make it home for dinner in time if it wasn't ?

 

Yeah, well good luck Margot, because you know deep inside that George Zimmerman called the cops on every color and the records will reflect it, they will even reflect he called more on non blacks, than blacks. The problem with your murderous wants, is that he actually called in the law to assist him. If Trayvon was off that sidewalk at anytime and looking in a window, whether or not it lives up to your personal standards, it is a legit reason to call, and not just the non emergency line, like George did. In order to prove he did this just based on skin color, you have to show a pattern of him having contempt for African Americans, and I just dont think thats possible here, I mean maybe he hated his mothers grandfather for being black?

 

You have a stranger following in a high crime area.. and it turns out he's carrying a gun??

As I said, until you understand the law and the charges, you will continue to think this case is a liberal conspiracy.

 

I don't think they let him go because they are racists as Obama and the other race baiters would have you believe.

 

That's a question GZ will be asked by the prosecution..

He will be asked if all the burglaries at the Retreat were committed by black males.

 

And you also know an African American woman from the neighborhood has said George was on alert because recently witness had seen black youth up to no good. Why you cant grasp that, is beyond me, but I know why.

 

Because it wasn't Trayvon..........

 

So what? What does that have to do with anything? Is that a reason to shoot someone? For a private citizen to detain someone? Confront someone?

 

Bingo......

There was nothing going on that night except in GZ's mind.

 

& If it doesn't are the type of person who will admit when they have been wrong?


BTW: Not sure if you know who Ailene Warnos is, but used the Zimmermna standard you seem to be applying, she would be considered INNOCENT using the SYG law that Zimmerman is using. So do you think Fla wrongly killed her?

Look her case up, she said it was always self defense.

 

There's no evidence Zimmerman tried to physically detain the kid, although there is evidence there may have been a confrontation. Confronting someone is not a reason to assault them.

People need to understand there is no legal standard to not provoke someone. You can provoke all you want, if the other person assaults you. Then they are the ones breaking the law, not you. If that was the case then people who get harassed by say.. Anti-abortionists outside the clinic could legally assault the protester that is harassing them.

 

Still doesn't explain why Zimmerman exited his vehicle to chase down Martin, confront 'em then shoot 'em to death *as legal* ... Zimmerheads think it's perfectly legal though.

 

Wrong.. If the other person is NOT doing anything unlawful and you put them in fear for their safety they have the right to defend themselves.

Your comparison to an abortion protest is not applicable.

 

And that is just what Zimmerman did when Martin confronted him.

 

Warnos was a whore who hated men, big difference.