Do you approve sex before marriage?

I didn't say all socialists are anything, I just said that anyone who thinks the Bible as a work of literature is "retarded" is just some rebellious teenage atheist/socialist who doesn't know anything - I was being more sarcastic than anything else. Whether your believe the Bible is the word of God or not, to diss it would be the same as dissing Homer's Odyssey or Shakespeare's works - pure ignorance.

 

Each to their own.

You don't have to have pre-marital sex if you don't want to, Ostap. So relax.

Others do want to, and they do, and whoopee-dee and all that jazz.

Nice that those who want to - do. And those that don't want to - don't.

I see no problem. (religious nutters, aside / those obsessed with sex, aside.)

"Flee Fornication", indeed. That's hilarious, right there.

What a world. You couldn't make it up, it's so funny...

 

Good to see sexist, antiquated drivel is alive and well on Political Forum. 'Tis a veritable riot of mirth. You show your datedness extremely well. Good show!!

 

Explain why so many young women end up staying in abusive relationships because they think "they're in love", or why being handsome usually isn't enough to get a woman to lie down with you if you don't act confident and dominant - while all a girl has to do to attract a man is show more skin?

 

Why would you equate a desire to have premarital or extramarital sex with pedophilia?

No, not really at all.

The odds of being injured in a mountain climbing accident are far, far, far, higher, and far, far, far fewer people will ever try it.

More than 99% of humans who live to the age of 50 will have sex.

Safe sex is more like safe driving - we go millions of miles without an accident, but it's the horrible, 20-car pileups that grab the headlines, not all the safe driving. Which is why we have a distorted view of how safe it is - we remember only the times it wasn't safe.

Do you deny that men generally have a higher sex drive than women? Or that women form more emotional attachments based upon sex? Because those aren't sexist, antiquated drivel; those are well-known, essentially universal, biological concepts.

 

Ok, let me rephrase. If you think sex is sinful before marriage, you're entitled to your opinion, but if you actually practice this particular belief, your honeymoon is going to be really awkward.

If you marry someone without knowing whether or not you're sexually compatible, you're basically a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing moron.

 

If you don't know the difference between casual sex and a committed relationship. . .you can't be helped!

 

If you don't know that there is no difference, then you can't

Sex is completely separate from a committed relationship - and neither are mutually exclusive. It's a recreational activity - whether or not two people having sex are committed in a relationship is no different than whether or not someone plays tennis with a person who's just a casual acquaintance vs. a dedicated friend/relationship.

The idea that "sex outside of a committed relationship" is wrong stems from people getting their ideas about love and relationships from Disney movies, and it's usually those most inexperienced in a relationship and sex who hold that view.

Sex isn't a big deal, period - it's just a way to get a good natural high. Love is totally unrelated to sex - it's possible to be in a serious platonic relationship with a person (where there's no sex involved).

 

No really, there isn't

Unless you think that playing tennis with a person one time is wrong, if you haven't promised to play tennis with them whenever they want to for the rest of their life (and no one else).

Guys who've yet to gain much experience in sex or relationships sometimes hold that view because they feel slightly self-conscious that they aren't getting as much sex as they'd like to, so it makes them feel more content in getting less - or they're just younger and have a Disney-movie-type view of "love" that they haven't grown out of yet - but deep down they're just holding back a natural urge.

 

How so? I think you are going way over board. The reason people have sex is because it feels good. Procreation is a by product in most cases. I have to ask do you think women should just lay there like dead fish while there master plants his seed and afterwards fixes his dinner? I really do not understand the point of this thread or any of the points you made. You are judging ones morality, getting involved in someones person life, plus forcing religious beliefs on other people. That sounds alot more dangerous to me than to people having sex.

 

That's why we have so many degenerate youth today.

Those who have sex should do so responsibly - while I disagree with his view that sex outside of marriage is always a bad choice, he's got way more virtue than you do - your only morality is apathy, as you've demonstrated more than once.

 

Is this a real question?
Are you crazy?????????????? Of course I approve of sex before marriage or else I'd be a 31 yr old virgin and a raving lunatic to boot. It looks like (don't mind me saying) you really need to get some of whatever get your jollies.

 

Apathy? Apathy gave me 3 orgasms sat night. Morality has it's place Mr. Cricket, but why am I sensing from you a need to blow the roof off , (so to speak)

 

Most women aren't made for casual sex. Psychologically, emotionally i mean. It is said that, and actually i think there was some movie about this, that women with many partners have difficulty connecting emotionally to husband and possibly children. And i do think i believe that. I've watched too many situations in real life where i had more than just casual knowledge. So i do think there's some validity to this belief. I also think that most women, if they had it to do over, would be virgins when they married.

 

lol, ask who's ready for casual sex.
And what does casual sex have to do with anything? BTW , what does sex play any part in these posts? I'm bi-sexual, and I'll vote any rwinger out of the stratosphere

 

Who votes that MisLed needs to get out more often?

 

I think so too. Lunch out everyday would be super.

 

are you saying you're fine with casual sex?

 

Fine? Of course I'm fine with casual sex. LOL, it's casual or some toothless redneck. (In Tn now so.............)

 

I don't approve of sex before a person has sense enough to be responsible about it; morality has nothing to do with it for me.

Of course, for some people, that would mean a lifetime ban

 

Horror of horrors

Don't you think casual sex should be a personal choice and part of the rights and freedoms we enjoy that were "endowed by our Creator"? I do.

 

I agree! I never have engaged in casual sex, and I personally don't like it, and I have tried to warn my children about the risks of engaging in casual sex, BUT it is a personal choice, and it should remain that way!

 

You make a good point, but the risks of engaging in casual sex are a thousand times less than riding in an automobile, but since I have casual sex and drive a Lexus I"m guessing it's a moot point.
You post good tho

 

Really so sex is to blame for everything wrong with the youth today.

My morality is apathy I would like to know when I have demonstarted that! feel free to show me where?

 

I think the comparison to Mt. Climbing is appropriate: fun, but potentially deadly. Here is but one example:

People just aren't careful and I have no clue as to why. They receive sex education in public schools and have access to condoms through the school nurse. I guess at the end of the day "barebacking" is more fun. Go figure.

Someone mentioned sex drives and the sexes:

The rest of the article is HERE.

I think the bolded is true for me. Sexuality, sexual attraction, and my sex drive has as much to do with how I feel about me that day as any male I encounter.