Confirmed Once Again: Liberals Hate Free Speech

It depends, if the alleged victim in the OP works for a public transport service, or military which is also publicly funded, they cannot display political paraphernalia because they have a duty to appear objective, this is according to government and company standards set by law, since they are funded by all taxpayers.

So the liberal in question, who has allegedly stolen this sticker, may have been a vigilante and should have reported the sticker to the proper authorities, so that they can handle it through government force.

 

If the OP is claiming that it could not have just fallen off, it had to be taken off, because of the adhesive. Shouldn't there be adhesive left on the bag? I see no evidence there was ever a sticker on the bag.

I am convinced that the OP is doing a parody of a kooky wingbat fringe righty in order to make republicans look bad.

 

I asked for evidence that people in this country don't pay taxes and you show them not paying a specific type of tax. It's well-known that roughly half of all Americans pay no federal income tax. But that is only one of many types of taxes paid in this country. It is literally impossible to live in America without paying some form of tax.

That's exactly how you're mischaracterizing it. I'm not, nor ever have, nor ever will, advocating for taxing one group and giving those funds to another. I'm for taxing all groups and using those funds for the benefit of all groups. Everyone pays, everyone receives (if they choose).

Well, I pay my share. It may not be as much as you pay, but then you probably make a hell of a lot more than I do.

Where did I say anything about raising taxes?

 

Your original question asked nothing about specific conditions. All you asked for was how it could lose its adhesive - which I answered.

You said a corner was already loose?

 

Yessss, let the hate flow through you!

 

I see. So you declare that this thread shows conservatives hate intelligent thought by specifically not offering any intelligent thought. Do you have an actual case to make? What specifically do you dispute? Do you have an actual argument to offer?

 

Yet another non-topical, non-cognitive reply. Since this is such a mindless thread, it should be easy for you liberals to destroy it. Yet many of you simply avoid any actual discussion or debate in favor of empty attacks.

 

What I need to do here is come up with a liberal-proof adhesive. It'll make me a FORTUNE.

 

Large corporation, not a government entity.

 

I'm convinced you can't feel the adhesive left behind on anything when looking at a small picture of it on the internet. But hey, yours is one of the more substantive replies so far- not that liberals have set the bar very high, mind you.

 

A case to make? An argument to offer? Oh I see, you mean a mindless incoherent partisan rant that goes on for a few paragraphs after my bold unsubstantiated declarative statement!! No you are right, I did not do that.

 

My post said you are undeniably brilliant, where is the attack in that?


PS. What exactly do you expect anyone to rebut? You didn't actually say anything!! You didn't actually make an argument for me to respond to. Next time start a thread with some substance and make an argument, and you will get substance and an argument in return.

 

I don't know what "argument" you are fishing for... What do you want us to say? That you're right and that all liberals hate free speech? Or that you're wrong and that all Republicans are stupid for thinking all liberals hate free speech? Am I supposed to provide proof that liberals don't hate free speech?

 

You could always just admit you made it all up. It's not like everyone doesn't already know. You just look foolish now.

 

you have yet to prove your claim that you're productive.

 

stickers don't normally just fall off. sticking to things is in their bloody name. they stick!

 

Well, accusing someone of lying without having a clue or addressing any of the actual topic is certainly one way of approaching it. However, I think you're mistaken as to who's looking foolish at this point. Feel free to actually think up a cognitive rebuttal instead of your usual empty attacks.

 

Your concession is noted.

 

I'm not interested in what you asked for. I backed up my claim. Now you've conceded many people don't pay federal income tax. Thank you for finally agreeing with me on that fact. The other two payroll taxes are primarily earmarked for one's own good later in life, so paying those doesn't really contribute to society. It's time people quit being so greedy and jealous, and start paying federal income tax. Now you mentioned other taxes like sales tax. Fair enough, yes pretty much everyone pays something. But until you've felt the sting of government taking tens of thousands of dollars of the money you worked for all year long as federal income tax, you don't really know what paying taxes is.

So then you're opposed to raising taxes just on the rich? Wow, my mistake. I must say, I'm shocked to hear you're against raising taxes on the rich while not doing so on other groups.

How do you define "fair share"? According to Barack Obama, the rich don't pay their fair share. The way I see it, the only people not paying their "fair share" are those who aren't paying federal income tax. How can the top 1%, who pay 30+% of the income tax burden not be paying their fair share when the bottom 50% pay nothing? What's your opinion on the matter? As for what I make, you might be surprised how little airline pilots make early in their careers. This has been a career change in my 40s, and it's a long road to paying off. I hope though that you are doing something you really love to do as I am. I believe that in general, if we find something we really love, money and happiness are likely to follow. It took me 40 years to figure that out, I bet you're quicker to figure that out than I was.

Again, my mistake for thinking you're for raising taxes on the rich. Frankly, I'm still in shock that I got that wrong.

 

Obama and his bunch of liberals try to silence Fox News by ignoring thier claims and refusing to answer thier
questions with the truth. Obama is scared to death of Fox News and will not even go on the show to be
questioned. He likes liberal news networks like CBS, NBC. and that bunch because they don't question his
behavior as a failed president. They applaud his minimal accomplishments.

 

Obama and Fox News are the same in those respects. There is no question Obama would take them off the air if he could. Perhaps he attempt to do so by executive order if reelected.

 

You're making it all up. There is nothing to debate. You know it and so does everyone else. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

 

You have nothing to offer. I already understand that. However, I know you will keep tap dancing and attacking, so go right ahead. Frankly, I think it's fun to watch people so insistent on posting in a thread yet refusing to address any of the material.

And your assertion about "everybody"- now THAT is completely made up.

 

Silence you? No not at all-if you brought this to a court-they would laugh you right out of the court room-I don't want to silence you-you represent a party that every time you open your mouth you drive people to the Democratic party-Why would I want to silence you-you make my job,so much easier.
That being said-I have had to put my research on this on hold as I was busy organizing the POTUS coming to Reno yesterday-WOW-What an event- (1) only (1) protester to over 2000 people-(he didn't stay very long).
But I did manage to speak to United Airlines & Southwest about their policies---Both said,that anti-political propaganda is not allowed by any of their personal on their bags or person,so 2 airlines are eliminated-I'll find out eventually what airline you don't choose to reveal
Also one of my volunteers at Democratic HQ'S is a retired Flight attendant from United airlines for 46 years,she is helping in the search-When I was asked why I was inquiring about this policy-It did spark their interest in checking to make sure their policies were being upheld-so,again, why would I silence you-Your actually HELPING.

 

I don't need to prove my personal life to you. Answer the question?