Lol !! What's the matter stinkers, Obama not the second coming like you thought he'd be ? Bwahahahahaaaaaaaaa ! EVEN CODE PINK WANTS OBAMA IMPEACHED. Radical group previously gave strong support to president http://kleinonline.wnd.com/2013/02/...-previously-gave-strong-support-to-president/
What I wouldn't give to see Code Pinkers show up in support of conservatives .... Code Pinkers protest at the 2012 RNC ...
Wait! This CAN'T BE!!! What about all the threads here on PF where Righties have claimed that Liberals, Code Pink, anti-war protesters etc. have left Obama ALONE to "wage his wars"? Could our Righties be wrong? Oh NOES!!!
Liberals eat their own whenever they have any semblance of power, that's a given, and now we conservatives simply get to watch with glee... Too many conservatives have become reactionary, I'm not of that type and understand the liberal cannibalization that always happens, so I smile in glee... Not to worry many and more causes will die by the same process, and I'll continue to watch and smile, liberals are more damaging to themselves than most will ever realize...
Sorry dude ... if code pink is calling for Obamas' impeachment ... well, it looks like thier conservatives now .... jus'nutha example of the lopsided conservative mind.
Guess he's not a socialist after all. Also, calling them code stink instead of code pink is not clever, it's unprofessional and unintelligent.
Why is that? Looks like even lefties are sick of Obama's BS. He's an equal-opportunity abuser that's all.
It didn't. Code Pink and many others have been protesting the whole time. Its the Right that had a cognitive block on seeing it, even when I posted links to demonstrations and calls to organize and protest. Righties should realize propaganda is a FAIL when it has such a blatant denial and clumsy attempts at forgery of reality.
Actually, all it means is that Code Pink is racissss. They're not calling for an impeachment of Our Messiah because they became conservatives, they're doing it because they're not getting their way. We all know that if you asked them if they would like to change their votes to Romney, they'd laugh in your face. That being said, if the drone wars weren't so depressing when it comes to seeing how low we've fallen as a nation, it would be downright hilarious just to watch liberals defending the drones. Let's face it: Ask any liberal if it would be okay for Romney to launch drones with the same authority The Messiah has. Their brains would explode faster than a Carnival cruise ship breaks down.
Perhaps the fervency of the outrage is reduced because Obama actually IS bringing troops home, rather than finding new excuses to exploit and kill the troops in new fanciful "Adventures in Bombing for Democracy".. Just a guess. If Romney had promised to bring them home, he might have gotten support too. But we will never know because Romney had committed the USA to a war with Iran even before he took office.
Rather than watching with glee, wouldn't now be a good time to join together and follow up on the cause once and for all? Is spectating or pointing out hypocrisy in order to score points for your own party really a better priority than agreeing and joining the cause to deal with the war crimes issue once and for all? Unless of course you don't believe in that cause. Or to put it another way, just say, "you hate war crimes? Well I hate war crimes! Let's get rid of war crimes!" Like the enemy of your enemy is your friend (at least for practical purposes), realizing both sides claim to be against the war crimes, so then wouldn't war crimes be the bigger enemy? Once you sort out the problems you agree with both sides need sorting, then you can go back to partisan quibble.
Troops are slowly coming home, but the drone attacks have increased, and I don't see a whole lot of outrage coming from your side. Had Bush stepped up the drone attacks, and implemented a policy of going after Americans who are fighting, I think your side would be foaming at the mouth much more.
