bin Laden's son in law in New York court

It wasn't an argument kid,it was a statement

George Bush wasn't the government,and clarke acted on his own authority....deal with it,I'm tired of posting to you about this

 

So how would you propose to give them "due process"? Walk into a terrorist camp in another country and arrest them? Or assign details to watch them until they left the camp and the country and made it possible to arrest them - and in the meantime, let them continue to plan and execute terrorist attacks against Americans and American interests?

I'll bet if you had asked them, they would have denied being Americans - having cast their lives and loyalties with the terrorists. They obviously hated this country and the protections it affords its citizens and CHOSE to leave it and try to harm it as much as possible. By their own actions, they are NOT Americans and would not wish to be treated as such. They were no different than any other terrorist sitting in a terrorist camp planning the destruction of America and IMPO, we didn't owe them any of the protections they voluntarily left behind.

 

How would YOU want to be afforded due process?

 

Well, at least you're not repetitive.

 

it's still ridiculous

bush was head of the government and commander in chief, clarke was in president's cabinet to advise him and to assist him in carrying out his duties

 

No (*)(*)(*)(*) Sherlock, the point I was making is that when at war, you can shoot an enemy when they are out operating freely. You cannot just shoot them when they have been captured.

 

Why not? That's what we did to bin laden lol.

 

because it's stupid, unethical and counter productive

no it's not

 

Yeah it is, we caught him with his pants down the killed him. And it's not counter productive at all, nothing wrong what so ever by killing as many Muslim psycho terrorists where they stand instead of wasting another dime on their disgusting and unworthy lives.

The only good Muslim terrorist is a dead one.

 

your delusions aren't reality

 

Thats a load of progressive America hating neo-communist leftist loser Islamonazi appeasing propaganda crap. Even the Saudi Royals contribute to terrorist organizations. Screw Islam and the flea infested camel they rode in on.

 

All this Islamonazi loser is entitled to is a military tribunal and a long drop from a short rope, and that is true od every Islamo in Gitmo.

- - - Updated - - -

When you are right, as I always am, you can not be reptitive.

 

oh look, more delusional drivel

 

I suppose that leftists might think so, as most leftists are intellecually disengaged and burdened with a leftist loser point of view, further compounded by being a MaO'bama voter.

 

more evidence of delusional thinking, what a surprise

 

Psycho babble, is that all the left has? Total deflection from the topic that bin Laden's son inlaw should not be tried in American courts or polluteing American soil with his Islamonazi presence, he should be in Gitmo and a military tribunal for a trial. Islam is at war with the USA, only the clueless MaO'bama voters think otherwise.

 

you're projecting you're own state of mind

you sound just like the muslim extremists


Military commissions fail to meet U.S. constitutional and international law fair trial standards.

Federal civilian criminal courts have convicted nearly 500 individuals on terrorism-related charges since 9/11.1 Military commissions have convicted only seven.

Federal prisons hold more than 300 individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses. None has ever escaped.

Federal courts have repeatedly imposed stiff sentences on those convicted of terrorism-related charges.

Prosecuting terror suspects before military commissions makes them look like warriors rather than common criminals. Those who argue that terror suspects should be tried before military commissions because they do not deserve our regular courts miss the mark. As Judge William Young said when sentencing Shoe Bomber Richard Reid, “You’re no warrior.... You are a terrorist. A species of criminal guilty of multiple attempted murders.”

that's funny considering that obama has done what bush couldn't do in regards to the war against terrorists

 

Same reason emptyhead Ubama bows down to foriegn leaders that hate the U.S.

 

REALLY! You mean Ubama is in jail. Thanks for the heads up.

 

Really Obama must be so soft on terror? How come he has assassinated more terrorists and killed three times as much more terrorists than bush did in 8 years ? Hmm

 

like he can give rational answers to good questions

 

Well little one we are at war with these type of people. When we are at war with our enemy do you think we should just bring the ones we caught back the U.S. so we can give them a fair trial in our courts?

And as far as an enemy like this why don't you give a little more thought to the American citizens that lost their lives on 9/11. Sounds like your putting the enemy ahead of those citizens.

 

And those laws do not involve giving ones like that a trial in a U.S. court. It should be handled by our military.

 

Its not about hating Muslims...its about giving a fair trial to our enemy in a U.S. court. Its not that he was a DWI...he was in on killing American citizens.

You have such a soft heart. Just becareful not to lose it.

 

Guys stop looking through a straw. Yes if we have a choice this murderer should be killed or hanged that will sure make us feel good right? What does America stands for? This war is more than just physical, we are fighting a moral, psychological and geographical war! A war of ideas, a war of our way of life! This trial is just a showcase of how our democracy works. Off course we can just kill him.. To show how tough we are on terror but we also want to win the hearts and soul. War cannot be won with missiles and bullets alone! Open your eyes!