What Sequester?… Obama Spends $350 Million on Sexual Indoctrination Classes For Child

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Doc91478, Mar 28, 2013.

  1. Doc91478

    Doc91478 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2013
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    by Jim Hoft
    March 28, 2013

    The White House may be locked up due to the sequester cuts but that didn’t stop the Obama administration from spending $350 million on sexual indoctrination of children.

    Here’s one of the ads from the federally funded Personal Responsibility Education Program.
    too skinny jean


    Life News reported, via Free Republic:
    While the White House says sequestration has eliminated funds for children touring the White House, President Obama has no problem spending $350 million federal tax dollars for sexual indoctrination programs starting in kindergarten for those same children.

    This is not your grandmother’s sex education about how things work and what can go “wrong.” In fact, the exact opposite is the essence of the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP): Obamacare funnels $75 million annually into PREP, which must be used exclusively for Planned Parenthood-style “comprehensive” sex ed programs where no type of sex is wrong and the only sexual behavior PP considers “unsafe” is becoming pregnant.

    Read more:
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...n-sexual-indoctrination-classes-for-children/

    Will it be an Easter Egg, or canceled for the sexual orientation for children?
     
  2. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Good for Obama! This is the type of sexual education we need. Abstinence education is a joke and a failure. Children must be taught about all aspects of sex from a young age onto high school.
     
  3. Defengar

    Defengar New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,891
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    holy (*)(*)(*)(*) OP, that article was dripping with so much partisan dribble more than half of it was the writer bashing Obama. Can't take that source seriously.
     
  4. Goodoledays

    Goodoledays New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,598
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :flip:Yep...and thats the responsibility of the parents...not the gov't. Its bad enough you let the gov't get into our phone calls but you let them into our pants and thats the end of it. Theres no where else left to go.
     
  5. richface

    richface New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2012
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Interesting.. But ask any republican what cuts should be made and they will dodge the question so fast you will think they had reflexes of a cat. Its fine for hannity and old Reilly to finger point small projects like these but you trying cutting over 80 billion of the budget and see if pain is not felt somewhere. Republicans say ahh you must cut and then moan when the cutting is done? Pure politics! I even heard hannity complain about obama's vacations give me a break! Maybe he should also forgo security to save a few trickles and avoid touching the big nest. Look, if congress was so hurt by White House tours how about we save money by cutting down the budget for expenses! Anyone know the limit for congressional staff? Ha.. There isn't any! While republicans preach about tightening their belts ! Guess what these fat cats are loosening their belts! So to conservatives ! News flash you cannot cut 80 billion off the budget with no pain being felt! Guess who will not be feeling the pain? Members of congress! Solution? Stop focusing on presidential limos and obama's vacations the real cuts new to comes from Medicare and Medicaid ! And congress while we are at it!
     
  6. AnnaK

    AnnaK New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,893
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you have any idea at all how many parents shirk that responsibility - many of them because they think if their kids know about sex, they'll go out and do it? And many because they don't know how to educate their kids about sex? Or how many kids have questions they can't/don't want to ask their parents but know they'll get a truthful, factual answer in a sex ed class?

    What kind of sex education do kids get from parents who believe knowing what homosexuality is will make their children homosexuals? LOL!
     
  7. bclark

    bclark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,627
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Based on what standard. You know when we used to teach abstinence in the schools, the STD rates were a heck of a lot lower.

    http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats07/figures/1.htm
    fig1bw.gif
     
  8. EyesWideOpen

    EyesWideOpen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,743
    Likes Received:
    2,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sex with toys, with yourself, with blow up dolls, with grown men, hey, teach it all right? How about, we send our children to school to learn reading, writing, history, arithmetic, science, and the parents teach them about their values, ethics and morality concerning sex?
     
  9. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47,159
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Modern proverb:

    Give a progressive female 30 year old law student a condom and she can screw for a day. Give her a box of 30 condoms and she can screw for a month before she's back to asking you for more free condoms.


    (Don't blame me. I didn't set up this insane liberal Establishment.)
     
  10. EyesWideOpen

    EyesWideOpen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,743
    Likes Received:
    2,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's wrong with teaching kids that it is responsible behavior to control their sexual urges with abstinence, it's better then schools teaching them to (*)(*)(*)(*) like rabbits with free flavored condoms that leak.
     
  11. RedWolf

    RedWolf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm all for teaching children about sex and how to use protection but that isn't the governments job. No one should teach my kids but me when it comes time.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I'm all for teaching children about sex and how to use protection but that isn't the governments job. No one should teach my kids but me when it comes time.
     
  12. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Abstinence is a laughable concept. Humans are sexual people and its UNNATURAL to abstain until marriage. Teaching kids that sex is taboo and dirty does nothing to progress society. It only serves to satisfy the religious idiots who still think you should have to wait until marriage.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Abstinence is a laughable concept. Humans are sexual people and its UNNATURAL to abstain until marriage. Teaching kids that sex is taboo and dirty does nothing to progress society. It only serves to satisfy the religious idiots who still think you should have to wait until marriage.
     
  13. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
  14. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So define at what age you think a young girl should be shown pictures of a penis? and at what age a young boy should be shown pictures of a vagina? (for education purposes of course)
     
  15. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Sixth grade would be a good start.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Sixth grade would be a good start.
     
  16. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whew. I have heard liberals toss the word kindergarten around recently when talking about sex education.
     
  17. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Kindergarteners are too young to even understand the concept. We as a nation need to end this ridiculous taboo on human genitals. Everyone has 1 or the other. Its 2013 time to kick out "puritan" views from our society. Namely religion.
     
  18. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually some have both genitalia.
     
  19. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,208
    Likes Received:
    20,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hell to the no, children deserve an innocent point in their lives where they aren't corrupted by adult problems and/or behaviors.

    We teach Economics starting in H.S(and at that, it's not enough I'll admit). The same concept should apply here. I can go for middle school, but not kindergarten.

    These kids need to learn social interaction for THEIR age group.
     
  20. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah. That's been tried and has failed miserably and is one of the reasons the US has one of the highest teen pregnancy, teen STD, and teen abortion rates in the industrialized world.

    Comprehensive sex education is a proven strategy to reduce all of these. Unfortunately, some areas of the US decided that slut shaming and trying to scare kids away from sex was more important than teaching them to choose wisely and protect themselves WHEN they begin to have sex.

    So $350,000,000 spent to protect children using programs with a high efficacy? We should be spending 10x that. That's a pathetic amount of money for something so important.
     
  21. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah...and then they spiked up because the majority of the kids didn't know what an STD was or how you caught it. Their ignorance is what got them in trouble and infected.
     
  22. Defengar

    Defengar New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,891
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because leaving it to parents works so well. Sarah Palin would kno- oh wait...
     
  23. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for the heads up and don't pay any attention to the anything-goes crowd.
     
  24. Goodoledays

    Goodoledays New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,598
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roflol:And you really believe teaching this in the schools for a long period of time is going to keep the kids out of the beds together. Open your eyes...all its going to do is introduce the kids and double what we have.
     
  25. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A lot better than that gotten from a liberal indoctrinator.
     

Share This Page