Two 11-Year-Olds Receive Threats for Testifying Against Same-Sex Marriage

I coached a boy in baseball one year, while running to first, he overextended his reach while running and his left testicle twisted. Well, he didn't want to tell his mother that he hurt himself down there because he was embarrassed to talk to her about that area. After about 3 days, he couldn't walk the pain was so great he had to. But then it was too late. He had to have his left nut removed (and replaced with a filler to keep symmetry down there)

Telling his father can be done a little better with less embarrassment but he had none. But even if he had a 2nd mommy, that still doesn't fix the issue of being embarrassed to show a girl that he's hurt down there.

 

If you're referring to me, I didn't HOPE for anything - just pointing out that such things DO happen which I'm sure you know.

Children need a family with one or more adults who love them and provide them a safe and secure home and who are entitled to the same rights every other family has. What do "real" moms and dads do that's different from a same-sex couple with children? Is there a difference in the way they love them, or the interest they take in their school and sports? A difference in their concern for the child's health and welfare?

Children of gay parents WANT them to be able to get married because if something happens to one of their parents, they can be taken away from the other by family members of the one who died. They also need that physical, emotional/psychological sense of security that children of heterosexual couples have - knowing that the only way they'll lose their parents is if BOTH of them die.

I wonder if you could explain to me why a lesbian woman who bears a child of her own body isn't a "real mom"? And why a gay man who fathers a child with a woman isn't a "real" dad? I'm sure there's a scientific explanation for such an assertion and I'd really like to hear it.

Do you think Dick Cheney feels that his daughter and her lesbian partner (now married if I'm not mistaken) aren't "real" parents to his grandchild?

 

Conservatives are quick enough to vehemently deny that they bear any blame when clinics are bombed, doctors shot and homosexuals beaten to death by the unstable RW fringes but they forget all that when some numbnutz threatens a child for doing what her father told her to do and we get to hear all about the "violence" of the left as a whole against people who disagree with them. Lmao!

 

Heaven forbid a same-sex couple raise their kids to think marriage should be between two people who love and are committed to each other and their family whether they're same-sex or heterosexual.

 

Ah, my friend. Not so. Cynicism is a sign of unenlightenment. Peace with the world is a sign of wisdom.

Actually, I've found it interesting that some of the teenagers on here are some of the most eloquent posters. Their ideas about the world might be a bit ideological stemming from lack of real world experience at this point in their lives, but their posts are often very articulate, concise, and well laid out.

I don't know if I'm allowed to reference individual posters by name, but since this is in a positive context, I'll go ahead and roll the dice here for a second. The Real American Thinker is about 17, I believe. Mr. Swedish Guy is the same age, if I'm not mistaken. And there used to be another poster here who went by Agent Zero, I think. He was around 18 when I first got here. All three of these guys have different views from one another, and yet their posts are consistently some of the most well written ones on the entire forum. Even when I don't agree with them, I always respect them.

There are a lot of bright young kids out there like this. You just don't find too many of them on the internet. Because most of them are usually off bettering themselves out in the real world. Whereas the internet is typically filled with trolls (i.e. people like me and you).

I'm sure you probably would expect that if you're a gay activist. Because you guys aren't exactly the most objective people at gauging the purity of your opponents' motives. There's an absurd amount of conjecture in the things that you guys say about us. In fact, if I have to hear "stop the hate" one more time, I'm going to round up a big group of my friends and crash a gay pride parade waving a big grey rainbow flag and chanting, "We just disagree! It's nothing personal! We hope you understand!"



And then we'll dump a big bucket of grey paper confetti on their heads, hug them, and say, "Have a nice day!" and leave.

 

Bullying is ok if a Lefty does it.

 

If your mind is open too much, all your brains will fall out.

That has not been my experience.

None of the kids you mentioned was 11 years old, even if I were to agree with you.

Technically speaking, I am not a gay activist. While I support some gay issues, they are not at the top of my list of priorities. I can and have supported people hostile to the gay agenda in the past, because they supported issues I thought were more important.

 

And if it's too closed, you can't learn anything.

Which is irrelevant because it does not negate my point.

Fair enough. I just take issue with the chronic vilification of traditionalists in modern society. Quite frankly, most of the claims leveled at them are usually just agenda driven, deliberately misinterpreted bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Smear campaigns are the tools of cowards.

 

There is no 11 year old in the history of the universe that has anything of value to teach me.

I feel exactly the same way when liberals parade kids out to give canned and coached opinions supporting their arguments as well. There is a really good reason we do not allow 11 year olds to have any input into laws or policy.

I am often on the side of traditionalists. But citizens cannot be denied rights or privileges in America merely for the sake of tradition IMO. The state needs to demonstrate a compelling reason to do so, beyond tradition.

 

I'm a Conservative and I have my own question.... where do you get your appalling nerve asking your ridiculous question about Conservatives being 'hateful murderers' when the below is all over the internet and also posted here.... did you even read it?


TFP Student Action, a Roman Catholic organization, recorded some of the threats on the YouTube video of Sarah’s speech went viral on homosexual websites. Some of them read:

If I ever see this girl, I will kill her. That’s a promise.

Her parents should be exterminated.

Kill this child and his [sic] parent, for my 11 birthday would be a wonderful gift, thanks.”

I hope you? get raped by your married parents.—madisonen;

Stupid bi**h - I? hope you die on your Bday!!!!!—geminiboi007;

A dumb way for a dumb bi**h to? do dumb things. Stop talking nonsense that your Christian, Anti-Gay parents are force-feeding you through a thin straw, and learn to accept other people. Now shut up bi**h, before I smack you.—123adbnvcs[/QUOTE]

And this is just some of the comments about this 11 yr old girl.....

So, you think these vile threats against this girl is ok? Well, no, it's not ok - anymore than if a bunch of straight people threatened an 11 yr old girl who was pro-gay.........

Sometimes I really wonder about you people..

 

liberals will only attack what they know they can truly overpower, in this case they get their rocks off by threatening little girls. but ill be damned if they dare attack murdering gangbangers and street thugs, they are too scared to stand up against something that will truly be able to fight back so they use these opportunities to vent because nothing is more vulnerable than a little girl that cant defend herself.

just what i have noticed about the spineless liberal, they wont stand up to something of equal size or bigger.

 

Name me one person in the entire thread who said this other than you.

Or drugs.

I would pay to see this. Sounds like an awesome comedy sketch.

And this just comes down to a matter of good parenting, along with not foisting this attitude that privates are "dirty" upon a child, not being cloistered-up religious folk, and the like. And of course, wanna bet that what you brought up was the sort of bizarre scenario you just don't get very often? But good on you for offering something a little less childish.

 

Sorry, but this is ridiculous. What had the child been taught about his body that made him too embarrassed to tell his mother he was seriously hurt? And why would it have been "a little better with less embarrassment" to tell his father - if he had one? IOW, if a boy is injured in his "private parts", it's going to be horribly embarrassing to tell ANYONE - even the doctor? - that he's hurt?

How do you think the hundreds of thousands of single parents - moms OR dads - manage when their children need personal advice? Is a single father supposed to pretend he knows NOTHING about the female body and can be of no help whatsoever in the health concerns of his daughter? Or a single mother make her son think if he has health problems, he's up (*)(*)(*)(*) Creek because she's a woman and isn't supposed to notice that he even has those "dirty private parts"?

I don't know how old you are but IMO, you're decades behind in the way kids feel about their bodies today. And I can guarantee you that no teenage boy I know would let himself become permanently injured rather than tell his mother he had hurt himself.

 

And this is just some of the comments about this 11 yr old girl.....

So, you think these vile threats against this girl is ok? Well, no, it's not ok - anymore than if a bunch of straight people threatened an 11 yr old girl who was pro-gay.........

Sometimes I really wonder about you people..[/QUOTE]

So in other words, these hateful words against an anti-gay person means that liberals are hateful murderers, but all the hate crime, death threats and murders of gays don't prove the same for conservatives?

I believe neither generalization. I'm merely pointing out the obvious double standards used in the partisan scapegoating.

- - - Updated - - -

And this is just some of the comments about this 11 yr old girl.....

So, you think these vile threats against this girl is ok? Well, no, it's not ok - anymore than if a bunch of straight people threatened an 11 yr old girl who was pro-gay.........

Sometimes I really wonder about you people..[/QUOTE]

So in other words, these hateful words against an anti-gay person means that liberals are hateful murderers, but all the hate crime, death threats and murders of gays don't prove the same for conservatives?

I believe neither generalization. I'm merely pointing out the obvious double standards used in the partisan scapegoating.

- - - Updated - - -

What about murders of gay children because they are gay. Same spineless politically motivated cowardice and hate, right? It proves conservatives only pick on children, right?

 

You've never been a 13 y. O. Boy have ya

 

Absolutely right........

 

Excellent point......

 

Holy crap! That's your opinion? Talk about being exploited, what's your opinion of the lesbian couple who's turning their 11 yr old born-a-male Tommy into a Tammy w/a hormone blocker that was posted a few pages ago? (*)(*)(*)(*) like that doesn't faze you?

But you think a girl would be better off w/a homo parent than her own hetero parents just b/c her parents, a male and female, aren't cheerleaders for homosexuality? Right, wrong or indifferent, it's their right to think whichever way they want.....

 

And ALL the data supports that fact.

 

No, it's REALITY.

To keep pretending that kids in single parent, or same sex couple households are in the SAME POSITION as those in NORMAL, TWO PARENT homes...is just IDIOTIC, and NO DATASET , ANYWHERE can make that assertion.

The APA and all of its "tentacles" just LIE about it, as it serves their blatantly PRO-GAY AGENDA.

 

Ironically, that 11 year old girl's speech was more mature, articulate, and eloquent than this entire post.

This is why I think Cricket's idea of a hierarchy might be the best option. Even a single parent home would probably be better than an orphanage. But a two parent - mom and dad - family would still be the top rung on the ladder.

 

what gay "children" were murdered? and secondly you sound like you are equating gay with weak.

please, explain yourself, this should be good.

 

My opinion is based on my own personal experience.... never had a father & the men I knew as a little girl, I disliked and feared. Adopted at age 10 and ended up w/a wonderful father and brother, 10 yrs older than me.

Because of my dad (and bro) I learned that masculinity can also be very gentle,loving and trusting - not something to fear that I had experienced in my early yrs. I was given the much-needed physical/psychological balance b/t femininity & masculinity which every kid needs.....

We lived in the country. I loved horses. My parents bought me a pony and my dad taught me how to ride, my mother taught me how to cook, my dad taught me how to fish, my mother taught me how to sew. my dad taught me how to shoot a rifle, my mother taught me how to crochet and on and on...... I was given the best of both worlds. I grew up loving the ruggedness of masculinity that would never have happened if I had not had my great dad......

Yes, there are hetero couples who adopt and they should never have been given those kids b/c they were unfit parents - and the same can be said about some homo couples who adopt. There are no guarantees.

I'm not saying that gay couples can't be good, loving parents, but sorry, there can't be any substitute for the real mom or dad..... they are what they are which is the opposite sex of the role they're playing....

 

Bingo.......

 

"If you're referring to me"? What? Why would I be referring to you when I wasn't even thinking of you? Gee Anna, get over yourself......

I never said a word about a lesbian woman who gave birth can't be a good mom - or the gay who fathered a child..... did I? No, I didn't......