there are grounds to revoke naturalized U.S. Citizenship, but at this time, there appears no evidence as such. Thus, he should and will be considered a U.s. citizen. However, even if he is not a U.s. citizen, has a permanent resident, he is still entitled to certain rights and privileges under our Constitution.. http://www.uscis.gov/policymanual/HTML/PolicyManual-Volume12-PartL-Chapter2.html
the one that gives him the right to due process you can't seem to get anything right this is post #89:
Well it didn't work for Miranda, so if there is other evidence there shouldn't be case for complete dismissal.
Once a court has evaluated the evidence against them to determine they DID violate their oaths, you are free to strip them of their citizenship afaiac.
Once and for all, there is NO ARGUMENT that Tsarnaev qualified as an ENEMY COMBATANT, UNDER THE LAW. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 Definitions In this chapter: (1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT. (A) The term unlawful enemy combatant means (i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al Qaeda, or associated forces); or (ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President or the Secretary of Defense. http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdf ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyone here SERIOUSLY trying to pretend that Tsarnaev WAS NOT "a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant..." Give it a friggin' rest, willya? We had EVERY LEGAL and CONSITUTIONAL authority needed to have charged/held/questioned Tsarnaev as an ENEMY COMBATANT...we just do not have any LEADERSHIP with the BRAINS and BALLS to respond properly to the ongoing ISLAMIST ATTACKS on AMERICA...
Again, what evidence do you have that the boston bombers were connected with any foreign government or foreign entity to make such a claim. Do you know what is involved in labeling anyone as an unlawful enemy combatant?
Once we begin to cherry pick which parts of our Constitution we want to use....it will no longer be a useful tool for society. "Torture the punk and remove his rights by force...just keep 'yer hands off my guns, I gots me the right"
Am I going to say it never happened, NO! What I said was if other evidence exists, charges wouldn't be automatically dismissed based on the fact somebody didn't tell him he had rights. That's what happens on TV/movies. In real life, even Miranda himself didn't escape justice simply based on the the fact nobody read him his rights. Do you have any evidence or a possible link that shows that somebody was automatically released and all evidence was dropped simply because their rights were not read off of a card? Not likely since that is the mythology of TV/movies, but anything is possible I guess, especially if you have the money to buy your personal justice from an inconsistent judicial system that is easily swayed in some cases with power and money.
quoting 6 year old laws.....things change http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf (2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces
Obama himself let the FBI interview him without his rights being read under the "public security" exemption. Why did he change his mind all of a sudden?
Meets that definition to a T. They were supported by foreign terror orgs and that is a no brainer. If you believe other wise you are a fool.
Let's stop playing 20 questions. If you have a point to make let's hear it. Obama wimped out and let the terrorist slide into Miranda protection before it was necessary to do so. The next American who dies could be as a direct result of Obama pandering the radical Muslims.
You are the one making crap up. You don't know if they had foreign help do you? No you don't. They MOST LIKELY did or the FBI would not be in Southern Russia right now following up on what that scumbag was doing there.
we have no evidence of what youre alleging...we dont hold people as enemy combatants based on some internet crackpot theory
So other than the Boston Marathon Bombing being a criminal act. Do you consider the Bombing, death of three Americans and the wounding of at least two hundred a terrorist attack?
He's getting more due process than he was entitled to. And far more than Obama gave that other ungrateful Muslim American citizen in Yemen. Obama allowed the latest failure of assimilation to stop talking before he said anything that could hurt the terrorist cause.
This Muslim immigrant was read his Miranda rights after only 16 hours of interrogation by the FBI when they could have grilled him for 48 hours. That is dereliction of duty by Obama and the libs in Washington.
Do you REALLY believe that the same President who ordered the leader of AQ killed would then turn around and let this little puny kid off the hook? I pray for you if you're that stupid.