FBI & Others Livid: Interrogation of Dzhokhar Was Stopped

what do you mean by that?

according to whom, you? what a joke

 

Obviously neither do you!

 

If you pray for stupid people pray for yourself.

And join the libs who were praying to their pagan gods that the bombers were white Christian conservatives instead of ungrateful Muslim immigrants.

Obama is an incompetent fool so I really can't explain all his zig's and zag's which don't make sense to rational people.

 

I mean the remark didn't answer my question in any shape or form.

 

you can't expect what he says to make sense

 

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-justice-department-torpedoes-boston-bomber-interrogation

 

that's why I was asking! duh!!

 

LOL so we should just take your word for it rather than excepting the completely obvious facts before our eyes? Umm, I think not.

Obama may be a fool, hell I agree he is, but he isn't responsible for every decision made by our government, and he most assuredly just because YOU disagree with a decision doen't make it a bad decision and conversely just because you THINK Obama made it , that doesn't make it a bad decision either.

Take off your partisan blinders and notice that the world consists of more than left /right.

- - - Updated - - -

Great, now show where it is legal for a person to be questioned for up to 24 hours prior to being read their Miranda rights. Oops it isnt.

 

Have you ever heard of Harry Truman and the sign on his desk that read "the buck stops here?"

Obama takes credit for every success of the war on terror so he deserves the blame when one of his flunkies screws up.

They are after all his shadow and move as he tells them to move.

 

if they had waited too long and jeapordized the prosecution righties would blame him for that

 

Okay, I will type this slow and try to use two syllable words or less for you since you don't seem to get it.

Just because YOU don't like Obama doesn't make a decision a bad one, even if you attribute (that means give him the blame) that decision to Obama

Also,

Just because YOU disagree (that means don't like) a decision,that doesn't make it a bad decision.

Get it now?

 

I do.

You are a knee-jerk Obama apologist who will defend everything he does.

It's so predictable that libs will come on here and deny reality when it makes their Dear Leader look bad to average Americans.

 

There is no waited too long. Police have 48 hours to CHARGE someone with a crime or release them, THIS has nothing to do with Miranda warnings. There is no time limit , the only real rule is they are supposed to be read their rights before questioning begins.

Why do people continually spout bad information?

- - - Updated - - -

LOL I'm actually fairly conservative and voted Republican in the last 3 elections.

Nice try though.

 

you tell me...

miranda has nothing to do with being charged, it has to do with being in police custody and questioned.

...The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he/she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her.

notice it says custody, not charged yet

 

notice how it doesn't say anything about any dereliction of duties by obama

 

Exactly my point, the 48 hour thing has squadooch to do with Miranda.

 

any information collected could not be used in court, that is well established fact

- - - Updated - - -

I agree

 

lol nobody brought up the 48 houirs but you wtf

 

Dereliction of duty is a conclusion that does not belong in a news report that should deal only with the facts.

But the purpose of facts is to inform and allow Americans who think for themselves to make good conclusions based on common sense not emotion.

Libs worship Obama and have an emotional attachment to him that prevents them from thinking logically.

 

which only further goes to show how partisan some are being in this thread. Crying that now the FBI can't question this kid about what he might know about other terrorists.

Sure they can, they just can't use that information in HIS trial. They are free to question him all they want. He is free to say nothing, or spill the beans. Makes no difference as to whether it is illegal for them to do so. It isn't.

The only catch is they'd have to be very careful not to uncover evidence against him for this case during that questioning. They can even use the information gleaned in a trial against someone else, In other words, Bill can't sue if Bob gave up information on him when they questioned him without Mirandizing him.

- - - Updated - - -

Good thing your hatred of Obama is rational and logical without a bit of emotion. LOL

 

I'm not blinded by Obamamania like you libs are.

I see him for the failure that he his while libs don't.

 

ROFLMAO........................it was Obama who was giving the orders and in operational control? When did he invoke federal martial law and take over from the local and state officials?

So why would it have matter if we asked him a few more times after developing the evidence we now have like the Russia involvement of his brother and the evidence now that they were planning other bombings?

 

I tend to agree that the usually passive Obama was just along for the ride hoping to bask in the glory when the white Christian conservatives were caught.

He did not evoke martial law but did promise to supply the state with anything it wanted.

 

The older brother was a foreigner he was not a citizen. He intended to maim and kill innocent people in the USA or he wouldn't have placed the bombs in Boston. How much more does it take to call someone and unlawful enemy combatant? He wasn't handing out ice cream to children, he fully intended to harm people. I would call that an enemy combatant.

 

I have to disagree with the people I most respect on this forum, but in this case we are dealing with a US citizen, he must be protected by all the rights and freedoms in which our country was Founded upon. Keep in mind that this current administration of losers, liars, and cheats has added its political opponents, the 'right wing extremists' as one the biggest threats to our security. As an opponent to this administration, I have no idea what standards they will employ to fulfill their goal of silencing or otherwise eliminating such opposition, therefore I want my rights and freedoms to be protected to the utmost. The fact this administration and the media was praying for the perpetrator to be a 'right wing extremist' only solidifies my resolve in hoping all citizens receive the same protections our Founders' envisioned for all citizens...